Efeitos da desoneração tributária sobre a difusão da banda larga no Brasil: Enfoque na incidência do FISTEL sobre o terminal de acesso individual por satélite.

Charlita de Freitas, Luciano and Euler de Morais, Leonardo and Cervieri Guterres, Egon (2017): Efeitos da desoneração tributária sobre a difusão da banda larga no Brasil: Enfoque na incidência do FISTEL sobre o terminal de acesso individual por satélite.

Abstract

This study analyzes the economic and tax effects of an eventual equalization of the satellite based access terminals and mobile cellular broadband, for the purpose of charging the Telecommunications Inspection Fund (FISTEL). Estimates of demand were elaborated with the aid of empirical instruments to gauge the price elasticity and projections of demand for broadband service. Results indicate that the eventual equalization of taxes incidence induces growth of the band penetration in Brazil, as well as generates positive effects on the aggregate of the tax revenue from satellite broadband providers.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Effects of tax relief on broadband diffusion in Brazil: Focus on the incidence of FISTEL over the individual satellite access terminal.
• Language: Portuguese
• Keywords: Banda Larga; Satélite; Banda Ka; FISTEL; Broadband;Satellite;Brazil; Ka band
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O23 - Fiscal and Monetary Policy in Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

ABDALA, R., OLIVEIRA, J., KUBOTA, L., WOHLERS, M. (2009). Banda larga no Brasil: Por que ainda não decolamos? IPEA Radar, 5, 9–15. ALVIN, B. M., PRADHAN, R.P. (2014). Broadband penetration and economic growth nexus: evidence from cross-country panel data. Applied Economics, 46 (35), 4360-4369. AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICAÇÕES – ANATEL. (2016a). Voto nº 20/2016/SEI/IF: Proposta de submissão à consulta pública de revisão do PGMC, Processo nº 53500.207215/2015-70. ANATEL: Brasília. ____________________________________________(2016b). Consulta Pública nº 35: Proposta de revisão do Plano Geral de Metas de Competição (PGMC). ANATEL: Brasília. ____________________________________________(2017a). ANATEL Dados: Comunicação Multimídia. Disponível em: http://ftp.anatel.gov.br/dados/Acessos/Comunicacao_Multimidia/, consultado em 5/4/2017. ____________________________________________(2017b). Análise nº 24/2017/SEI/LM: Proposta de limitar o uso das faixas de radiofrequência de 18,1 GHz a 18,6 GHz e de 27,9 GHz a 28,4 GHz, da Banda Ka, a redes de satélite do Serviço Fixo por Satélite (SFS). ANATEL: Brasília. BANCO MUNDIAL. (2017). World Bank Data: Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people). Disponível em: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.BBND.P2?view=chart , consultado em 5/4/2017. BERTSCHEK, I., CERQUERA, D., KLEIN, G.J. (2013). More bits - more bucks? Measuring the Impact of Broadband Internet on Firm Performance. Information Economics and Policy, 25(3), pp.190-203. BRASIL (2010). Decreto nº 7.175, de 12 de maio de 2010, que institui o Programa Nacional de Banda Larga – PNBL. Presidência da República: Brasília. ______(2016a). Portaria nº 1.455, de 8 de abril de 2016, que estabelece diretrizes para a atuação da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações - Anatel na elaboração de proposta de revisão do atual modelo de prestação de serviços de telecomunicações. Ministério das Comunicações: Brasília. ______(2016b). Decreto nº 8.776, de 11 de maio de 2016, que institui o Programa Brasil Inteligente. Presidência da República: Brasília. CARDONA, M., SCHWARZ,A.,YURTOGLU,B.B.,ZULEHNER,C.(2009). Substitution between DSL, cable, and mobile broadband Internet service. in: B.Preissl, P. Curwen, & J.Huacap (Eds.), Telecommunication markets, contributions to economics. Heidelberg: Springer. CHAUDHURIA, A., FLAMM, K. (2007). An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Telecommunications Policy, 31, 312–326. CRANDALL, R.W., HAHN, R.W., TARDIFF, T.J. (2002). The benefits of broadband and the effect of regulation. In Crandall R.W., Alleman J.H. (ed) Broadband: shouwld we regulate high-speed internet access? Washignton, 295-330. EVANS, B., WERNER, M., LUTZ, E., BOUSQUET, M., CORAZZA, G.E., MARAL, G., RUMEAU, R. (2005). Integration of satellite and terrestrial systems in future multimedia communications. IEEE Wireless Communications 2005 (10), 72-80. FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS – FGV. (2017). Pesquisa Anual do Uso de TI - 28ª Edição. Coord. Fernando S. Meirelles. FGV: Rio de Janeiro. GILLETT, S.E., LEHR, W.H., OSORIO, C.A., SIRBU, M.A. (2006). Measuring Broadband's Economic Impact. Final Report National Technical Assistance, Training, Research, and Evaluation Project No. 99-07-13829. KOELLINGER, P. (2005). Why IT matters – An Empirical Study of E-Business Usage, Innovation and Firm Performance. German Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 495, DIW Berlin. KOLKO, J. (2012). Broadband and Local Growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(1), 100-113. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA- IBGE. (2016). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (PNAD) 2015. IBGE: Rio de Janeiro. IPSOS Marketing. (2016). Hughes: Market understanding. JOB 15-041194-01. IPSOS: São Paulo. FEDERAÇÃO DAS INDÚSTRIAS DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO – FIRJAN. (2015). IFDM 2015: Índice FIRJAN de desenvolvimento municipal. FIRJAN: Rio de Janeiro. GALPERIN, H., RUZZIER, C.A. (2013). Price elasticity od demand for broadband: Evidences from Latin America and the Caribbean. Telecommunications Policy, 37, 429-438. KENNY, R., KENNY, C. (2011). Superfast: Is it really Worth a subsidy? Info, 13(4), 3-29. NAVAS-SABATER, J., DYMOND, A., JUNTUNEN, N. (2002). Telecommunications and information services for the poor - toward a strategy for universal access. World Bank discussion paper n° WDP 432, The World Bank: Washington, D.C. ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA A COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO – OCDE. (2008). Broadband and the economy: Ministerial background report. DSTI/ICCP/IE(2007)3/Final Technical Report. OECD: Paris. ______________________________________________________________.(2015). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015. OECD: Paris. STANTON, L. J. (2004). Factors influencing the adoption of residential broadband connections to Internet. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE: Washington. RABELLO, G.G., OLIVEIRA, J.M. (2015). Tributação sobre empresas no Brasil: comparação internacional. Radar: tecnologia, produção e comércio exterior (41), IPEA: Brasília. SATELLITE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION - SIA. (2017). State of the Satellite Industry Report 2016. SIA: Washington. The International Telecommunication Union – ITU. (2014). The State of Broadband 2014: Broadband for all. A report by the Broadband Commission. UIT: Genebra. ________________________________________. (2016). The State of Broadband 2016: sustainable development. Broadband Commission for sustainable development. UIT: Genebra. TRIPP, H., FORD, A. (2011). Understanding Satellite Broadband Quality of Experience – Final Report. Produced for Ofcom, Report n°: 72/11/R/193/R (Issue 1). OFCOM: Londres.