Measuring the size of the shadow economy using a dynamic general equilibrium model with trends

Solis-Garcia, Mario and Xie, Yingtong (2017): Measuring the size of the shadow economy using a dynamic general equilibrium model with trends.

Abstract

We propose a methodology for measuring the size and properties of the shadow economy. We use a two-sector dynamic deterministic general equilibrium model with four different trends: hours worked, investment-specific productivity, formal productivity, and shadow productivity. We find that the shadow productivity trend is endogenous, in the sense that it is an exact function of model parameters and the other three trends. We also document that, in order to be consistent with observed (real-world) trend growths, the shadow sector needs to exhibit increasing returns to scale, which is contrary to the standard procedure of imposing decreasing returns to this sector. We apply our methodology to a set of seven Latin American and Asian countries and document several empirical regularities that emerge from our analysis, the most important one being that the volatility of shadow sector output is considerably larger than the one in formal sector output.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: shadow economy, business cycles, DSGE models
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E26 - Informal Economy ; Underground Economy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements

References

Ceyhun Elgin and Oguz Öztunalı. Shadow economies around the world: model based estimates. Working Paper 2012/05, Bogaziçi University, Department of Economics, 2012.

Robert Feenstra, Robert Inklaar, and Marcel Timmer. The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10):3150–82, 2015.

Andrés Fernández and Felipe Meza. Informal employment and business cycles in emerging economies: the case of Mexico. Review of Economic Dynamics, 18(2):381–405, 2015.

Eric Friedman, Simon Johnson, Daniel Kaufmann, and Pablo Zoido-Lobatón. Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activity in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3):459–93, 2000.

Pedro Gomis-Porqueras, Adrian Peralta-Alva, and Christopher Waller. The shadow economy as an equilibrium outcome. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 41:1–19, 2014.

György Gyomai and Peter van de Ven. The non-observed economy in the System of National Accounts. Statistics Brief 18, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, June 2014.

Jane Ihrig and Karine Moe. Lurking in the shadows: the informal sector and government policy. Journal of Development Economics, 73(2):541–77, 2004.

Pierre Lafourcade and Joris de Wind. Taking trends seriously in DSGE models: an application to the Dutch economy. Working Paper 345, De Nederlandsche Bank, 2012.

OECD. Measuring the Non-Observed Economy: A Handbook. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2002.

Renzo Orsi, Davide Raggi, and Francesco Turino. Size, trend, and policy implications of the underground economy. Review of Economic Dynamics, 17(3):417–36, 2014.

Friedrich Schneider and Dominik Enste. Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1):77–114, 2000.

Friedrich Schneider, Andreas Buehn, and Claudio Montenegro. Shadow economies all over the world: new estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007. Policy Research Working Paper 5356, World Bank, 2010.

Mario Solis-Garcia and Yingtong Xie. Mismeasured GDP, business cycles, and the shadow economy. Unpublished manuscript, 2016a.

Mario Solis-Garcia and Yingtong Xie. Technical appendix: measuring the size of the shadow economy using a dynamic equilibrium model with trends. Unpublished manuscript, 2016b.

Karl Whelan. A two-sector approach to modeling U.S. NIPA data. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 35(4):627–56, 2003.