Davis, Brent (2017): “Negative Political Advertising: It’s All in the Timing”.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79449.pdf Download (519kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Negative political advertising is a common feature of election campaigns in liberal democracies, whether in the milder form of ‘contrast ads’ or the more aggressive form of ‘attack ads’.
Despite a substantial volume of scholarship, whether such advertisements generate persuasion effects (persuading voters of the deficiencies in the subject of the ads) or backlash effects (diminishing the standing of the candidate/party promulgating the ads) remains a still-unresolved question.
This ‘persuasion or backlash’ question may well reflect the implicit assumption in many of the research designs, and their associated (and consequently mis-specified) models: that causality runs from negative political advertising to vote intention. This article tests that assumption, and finds it wanting.
Testing for endogeneity indicates a bi-directional causality between negative political advertising and vote intention; each causes the other, but with differential temporal profiles.
For electoral scholars (and campaign strategists) this means the decision(s) to engage in negative political advertising is not just if, by whom or how, but also when.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | “Negative Political Advertising: It’s All in the Timing” |
English Title: | “Negative Political Advertising: It’s All in the Timing” |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | election campaigns; political advertising; voter behavior; politico-econometric modelling; endogeneity; election forecasting |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C54 - Quantitative Policy Modeling D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior |
Item ID: | 79449 |
Depositing User: | Dr Brent Davis |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2017 07:01 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:24 |
References: | Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S, Simon A, and Valentino N (1994) “Does Attack Advertising Demobilise the Electorate?” 88 American Political Science Review 829 -838 Auter Z J and Fine J A (2016) “Negative Campaigning in the Social Media Age: Attack Advertising on Facebook” 38 Political Behavior 999 - 1020 Banda K K and Windett J H (2016) “Negative Advertising and the Dynamics of Candidate Support” 38 Political Behavior 747 - 766 Bartels L M (2014) “Remembering to Forget: A Note on the Duration of Campaign Advertising Effects” 31 Political Communication 532 - 544 Brooks D J and Murov M (2012) “Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Group” 40 American Politics Research 383 -418 Dowling C M and Wichowsky A (2015) “Attacks Without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising” 29(1) American Journal of Political Science 19 - 36 Falkowski A and Cwalina W (2012) “Political Marketing: Structural Models of Advertising Influence and Voter Behavior” 11 Journal of Political Marketing 8 - 26 Fridkin K and Kenny P J (2011) “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns” 55(2) American Journal of Political Science 307 - 325 Fridkin K, Kenny P J, and Wintersieck A (2015) “Liar, Liar; Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising” 32 Political Communications 127 – 151 Garramone G M (1985) “Effects of Negative Political Advertising: The Roles of Sponsor and Rebuttal” 29 Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 147 - 159 Geer J G (2006) “In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago Haddock G and Zanna M P (1997) “The Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Election” 19 Basic and Applied Social Psychology 204 -223 Hill R P (1989) “An Exploration of Voter Responses to Political Advertisements” 18 Journal of Advertising 14 - 22 Huber G A and Arceneaux K (2007) “Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising” 51 American Journal of Political Science 957 - 977 Jackson R A and Carsey T M (2007) “US Senate Campaigns, Negative Advertising and Voter Mobilization in the 1998 Midterm Election” 26 Electoral Studies 180-195 Jackson R A, Mondak J J and Huckfeldt R (2009) “Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Politics” 62(1) Political Research Quarterly 55 -69 Jackson R A and Sides J C (2005) “Revisiting the Influence of Campaign Tone on Turnout in Senate Elections” 14 Political Analysis 206 -218 Jones M D and Jorgensen P D (2012) “Mind the Gap? Political Advertisements and Congressional Election Results” 11 Journal of Political Marketing 165 – 188 Kahn K F and Kenney P J (1999) “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship Between Negativity and Participation” 93 American Political Science Review 877 – 889 Kaid L L (1997) “Effects of Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton”, 40 American Behaviorial Scientist 1085 -1094 Kaid L L (2012) “Political Advertising as Political Marketing: A Retro-Forward Perspective” 11 Journal of Political Marketing 29 -53 Kaid L L, Fernande J and Painter D (2011) “Effects of Political Advertising in the 2008 Presidential Campaign” 55(4) American Behavioral Scientist 437 - 456 Krupnikov Y (2012) “Negative Advertising and Voter Choice: The Role of Ads in Candidate Selection” 29 Political Communication 387 -403 Lau R R and Pomper G M (2001a) “Negative Campaigning by US Senate Candidates” 7 Party Politics 69 -88 Lau R R and Pomper G M (2001b) “Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout in US Senate Elections 63 Journal of Politics 804 – 819 Lau R R and Pomper G M (2004) “Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of US Senate Elections”, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham Lau R R, Sigelman L, Heldman C and Babbitt P (1999) “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment”, 93 American Political Science Review 851 – 875 Lau R R, Sigelman L, and Rovner I B (2007) “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment”, 69 Journal of Politics 1176 – 1209 Min Y (2002) “Intertwinning of Campaign News and Advertising: The Content and Electoral Effects of Newspaper Ad Watches” 79 Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 927 - 944 O’Sullivan P B and Geiger S (1995) “Does the Watchdog Bite? Newspaper Truthboxes and Political Attack Ads” 72 Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly 771 – 785 Pattie C, Denver D, Johns R and Mitchell J (2011) “Raising the Tone? The Impact of ‘Positive’ and ‘Negative’ Campaigning on Voting in the 2007 Scottish Parliament Election” 20 Electoral Studies 333 – 343 Perloff R M and Kinsey D (1992) “Political Advertising as seen by Consultants and Journalists”, 36 Journal of Advertising Research 53 -60 Pinkleton B E (1998) “Effects of Print Comparative Political Advertising on Political Decision-Making and Participation” 48 Journal of Communications 24 -36 Ridout T N and Fowler E F (2012) “Explaining Perceptions of Advertising Tone” 65 Political Research Quarterly 62 - 75 Ridout T N, Franz M M and Fowler E F (2014) “Advances in the Study of Political Advertising” 13 Journal of Political Marketing 175 -194 Ridout T N, Franz M M, Golstein K M and Feltus W J (2012) “Separation by Television Program: Understanding the Targeting of Political Advertising in Presidential Elections” 29 Political Communication 1 – 23 Roddy B L and Garramone G M (1988) “Appeals and Strategies of Negative Political Advertising” 32 Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 415 -427 Shen F and Wu H D (2002) “Effects of Soft-Money Issue Advertisements on Candidate Evaluation and Voting Preference: An Exploration” 5 Mass Communication and Society 395 – 410 Stevens D (2005) “Separate and Unequal Effects: Information, Political Sophistication and Negative Advertising in American Elections” 58(3) Political Research Quarterly 413 - 425 Stevens D (2009) “Elements of Negativity: Volume and Proportion in Exposure to Negative Advertising” 31 Political Behavior 429 - 454 Stevens D (2012) “Tone vs Information: Explaining the Impact of Negative Political Advertising” 11 Journal of Political Marketing 322 - 352 Stratmann T (2009) “How Prices Matter in Politics: The Returns to Campaign Advertising” 140 Pubic Choice 357 - 377 Wattenberg M P and Brians C L (1999) “Negative Political Advertising: Demobiliser or Mobilizer?” 93 American Political Science Review 891 – 899 Weaver Larisey R A and Tinkham S F (1999) “The Sleeper Effect and Negative Political Advertising” 28 Joudvertising 13 – 30 Weber C, Dunaway J and Johnson T (2012) “It’s All in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads” 34 Political Behavior 561 – 584 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79449 |