Chu, Angus C. and Cozzi, Guido and Furukawa, Yuichi and Liao, Chih-Hsing (2017): Inflation and Economic Growth in a Schumpeterian Model with Endogenous Entry of Heterogeneous Firms.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79555.pdf Download (530kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study develops a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous entry of heterogeneous firms to analyze the effects of monetary policy on economic growth via a cash-in-advance constraint on R&D investment. Our results can be summarized as follows. In the special case of a zero entry cost, an increase in the nominal interest rate decreases R&D, the arrival rate of innovations and economic growth as in previous studies. However, in the general case of a positive entry cost, an increase in the nominal interest rate affects the distribution of innovations that are implemented and would have an inverted-U effect on economic growth if the entry cost is sufficiently large. We also calibrate the model to aggregate data of the US economy and find that the growth-maximizing inflation rate is about 3%, which is consistent with recent empirical estimates. Finally, we also explore the welfare effects of inflation and consider a number of extensions to the benchmark model.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Inflation and Economic Growth in a Schumpeterian Model with Endogenous Entry of Heterogeneous Firms |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | monetary policy, inflation, economic growth, heterogeneous firms |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity |
Item ID: | 79555 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Angus C. Chu |
Date Deposited: | 07 Jun 2017 05:10 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:16 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., and Akcigit, U., 2012. Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1-42. Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica, 60, 323-351. Arawatari, R., Hori, T., and Mino, K., 2016. On the nonlinear relationship between inflation and growth: A theoretical exposition. KIER Discussion Paper No. 950. Baldwin, R., and Robert-Nicoud, F., 2008. Trade and growth with heterogeneous firms. Journal of International Economics, 74, 21-34. Barsky, R., Bergen, M., Dutta, S., and Levy, D., 2003. What can the price gap between branded and private-label products tell us about markups?. In Scanner Data and Price Indexes, edited by Feenstra, R., and Shapiro, M., p. 165-228. Bates, T., Kahle, K., and Stulz, R., 2009. Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to?. Journal of Finance, 64, 1985-2021. Berentsen, A., Breu, M., and Shi, S., 2012. Liquidity, innovation, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 59, 721-737. Bick, A., 2010. Threshold effects of inflation on economic growth in developing countries. Economics Letters, 108, 126-129. Booth, G., and Ciner, C., 2001. The relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation: International evidence. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 11, 269-280. Brown, J., and Petersen, B., 2011. Cash holdings and R&D smoothing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 694-709. Chu, A., 2010. Effects of patent length on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economics, 99, 117-140. Chu, A., and Cozzi, G., 2014. R&D and economic growth in a cash-in-advance economy. International Economic Review, 55, 507-524. Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Lai, C., and Liao, C., 2015. Inflation, R&D and growth in an open economy. Journal of International Economics, 96, 360-374. Chu, A., and Ji, L., 2016. Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20, 1127-1145. Chu, A., and Lai, C., 2013. Money and the welfare cost of inflation in an R&D growth model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45, 233-249. Cozzi, G., 2007. The Arrow effect under competitive R&D. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Contributions), 7, Article 2. Cozzi, G., Giordani, P., and Zamparelli, L., 2007. The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 788-797. Denicolò, V., and Zanchettin, P., 2010. Competition, market selection and growth. Economic Journal, 120, 761-785. Elsby, M., Hobijn, B., and Sahin, A., 2013. The decline of the U.S. labor share. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper No. 2013-27. Evans, L., Quigley, N., and Zhang, J., 2003. Optimal price regulation in a growth model with monopolistic suppliers of intermediate goods. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36, 463-474. Falato, A., and Sim, J., 2014. Why do innovative firms hold so much cash? Evidence from changes in state R&D tax credits. FEDS Working Paper No. 2014-72. Fisher, M., and Seater, J., 1993. Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review, 83, 402-415. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61. Guerrero, F., 2006. Does inflation cause poor long-term growth performance?. Japan and the World Economy, 18, 72-89. Gustafsson, P., and Segerstrom, P., 2010. Trade liberalization and productivity growth. Review of International Economics, 18, 207-228. Hall, B., 1992. Investment and R&D at the firm level: Does the source of financing matter?. NBER Working Paper No. 4096. Haruyama, T., and Zhao, L., 2008. Trade and firm heterogeneity in a quality-ladder model of growth. Kobe University Discussion Paper No. 223. He, Q., and Zou, H., 2016. Does inflation cause growth in the reform-era China? Theory and evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 45, 470-484. Hori, T., 2017. Monetary policy, financial frictions, and heterogeneous R&D firm in an endogenous growth model. Manuscript. Huang, C., Chang, J., and Ji, L., 2015. Inflation, market structure, and innovation-driven growth with various cash constraints. Manuscript. Huang, C., Yang, Y., and Cheng, C., 2017. The growth and welfare analysis of patent and monetary policies in a Schumpeterian economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, forthcoming. Iwaisako, T., and Ohki, K., 2017. Innovation by heterogeneous leaders. Osaka University Discussion Papers in Economics and Business with number 15-30. López-Villavicencio, A., and Mignon, V., 2011. On the impact of inflation on output growth: Does the level of inflation matter?. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33, 455-464. Marquis, M., and Reffett, K., 1994. New technology spillovers into the payment system. Economic Journal, 104, 1123-1138. Melitz, M., 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725. Minniti, A., Parello, C., and Segerstrom, P., 2013. A Schumpeterian growth model with random quality improvements. Economic Theory, 52, 755-791. Mishkin, F., 1992. Is the Fisher effect for real? A reexamination of the relationship between inflation and interest rates. Journal of Monetary Economics, 30, 195-215. Neto, A., Furukawa, Y., and Ribeiro, A., 2017. Can trade unions increase social welfare? An R&D model with cash-in-advance constraints. MPRA Paper No. 77312. Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., and Williamson, R., 1999. The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 3-46. Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311. Peretto, P., 2007. Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 353-382. Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102. Segerstrom, P., 1998. Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88, 1290-1310. Segerstrom, P., Anant, T.C.A. and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91. Vaona, A., 2012. Inflation and growth in the long run: A new Keynesian theory and further semiparametric evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 16, 94-132. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79555 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Inflation and Economic Growth in a Schumpeterian Model with Endogenous Entry of Heterogeneous Firms. (deposited 16 Mar 2017 11:54)
- Inflation and Economic Growth in a Schumpeterian Model with Endogenous Entry of Heterogeneous Firms. (deposited 07 Jun 2017 05:10) [Currently Displayed]