Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly

Kim, Seung-Leul and Lee, Sang-Ho and Matsumura, Toshihiro (2017): Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly.

Abstract

This article formulates a mixed oligopoly in which a public firm competes with two private firms that may adopt corporate social responsibility (CSR). We investigate the optimal privatization policy and find that, depending on the magnitude of CSR, the optimality of either nationalization or full privatization can hold. In particular, we show that the optimal degree of privatization is decreasing in the magnitude of CSR and thus nationalization can be optimal if they have homogeneous objectives. Under significant heterogeneity of the objectives among firms, however, the optimal degree of privatization is non-monotone with the magnitude of CSR, but full privatization can be optimal. This result suggests that the optimal privatization policy depends on both the magnitude of CSR and the heterogeneity of the objectives among private firms.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; partial privatization; mixed oligopoly
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises

References

Bian, J., Li, K. W. and Guo, X. 2016. A strategic analysis of incorporating CSR into managerial incentive design. Transportation Research Part E 86, 83-93.

Brand, B. and Grothe, M., 2013. A note on corporate social responsibility and marketing channel coordination. Research in Economics, 67(4), 324–327.

Brand, B. and Grothe, M., 2015. Social responsibility in a bilateral monopoly. Journal of Economics, 115(3), 275–289.

Cato, S. and Matsumura, T., 2012. Long-run effects of foreign penetration on privatization policies. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 168(3), 444-454.

Cato, S. and Matsumura, T., 2015. Optimal privatization and trade policies with endogenous market structure. Economic Record, 91(294), 309-323.

Chang, Y.-M., Chen, H.-Y., Wang, L.F.S. and Wu, S-J., 2014. Corporate social responsibility and international competition: A welfare analysis. Review of International Economics, 22(3), 625-638.

Chen, T.-L., 2017. Privatization and efficiency: a mixed oligopoly approach. Journal of Economics, 120(3),251-268.

Crifo, P. and Forget, V., 2012. The economics of corporate social responsibility: a survey. HAL id: hal-00720640

De Fraja, G. and Delbono, F., 1989. Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(2), 302-311.

Ghosh, A. and Mitra, M., 2014. Reversal of Bertrand-Cournot rankings in the presence of welfare concerns. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 170(3), 496-519.

Goering, G. E., 2012. Corporate social responsibility and marketing channel coordination. Research in Economics, 66(2), 142–148.

Goering, G. E., 2014. The profit-maximizing case for corporate social responsibility in a bilateral monopoly. Managerial and Decision Economics, 35(7), 493-499.

Haraguchi, J. and Matsumura, T. 2016. Cournot-Bertrand comparison in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 117(2), 117-136.

Hirose, K. Lee, S.-H. and Matsumura, T. 2016. Environmental corporate social responsibility as a collusive device. Working Paper, The University of Tokyo.

Hirose, K. Lee, S.-H. and Matsumura, T. 2017. Environmental corporate social responsibility: a note on the first-mover advantage under price competition. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 214-221.

Kitzmueller, M. and Shimshack, J. 2012. Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51-84.

Kopel, M., 2015. Price and quantity contracts in a mixed duopoly with a socially concerned firm, Managerial and Decision Economics, 36(8), 559-566.

Kopel, M. and Brand, B. 2012. Socially Responsible Firms and Endogenous Choice of Strategic Incentives. Economic Modelling, 29(3), 982-989.

Kowalski, P., Büge, M., Sztajerowska, M., and Egeland, M., 2013. State-owned enterprises: trade effects and policy implications. OECD Publishing, No. 147.

KPMG, 2008/2013. International survey of corporate responsibility reporting. KPMG international.

Lambertini, L. and Tampieri, A., 2015. Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly, Economic Modelling, 50, 40-48.

Lahiri, S. and Ono, Y., 1988. Helping minor firms reduces welfare. Economic Journal, 98(393), 1199-1202.

Lee, S.-Ho., Xu, L.-L. and Chen, Z., 2013. Competitive privatization and tariff policies in an international mixed duopoly. Manchester School, 81(5), 763-779.

Lin, M. H. and Matsumura, T., 2012. Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. Journal of Economics, 107(1), 71-80.

Liu, C.-C., Wang, L.F.S., and Lee, S.-H. 2015. Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters, 129, 108-111.

Matsumura, T., 1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473-483.

Matsumura, T. and Kanda, O. 2005. Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics 84(1), 27–48.

Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N., and Cato, S. 2013. Competitiveness and R&D competition revisited. Economic Modelling, 31(1):541-547.

Matsumura, T. and Ogawa, A. 2014. Corporate social responsibility or payoff asymmetry?. a study of an endogenous timing game. Southern Economic Journal, 81(2), 457-473.

Matsumura, T. and Okamura, M., 2015. Competition and privatization policies revisited: The payoff interdependence approach. Journal of Economics, 116(2), 137-150.

Merrill, W. C. and Schneider, N., 1966. Government firms in oligopoly industries: A short-run analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(3), 400-412.

Nakamura, Y. 2014. Capacity choice in a duopoly with a consumer-friendly firm and an absolute profit-maximizing firm, International Review of Economics and Finance 34, 105-117.

Wang, L.F.S. and Chen, T. L., 2010. Do cost efficiency gap and foreign competitors matter concerning optimal privatization policy at the free entry market?. Journal of Economics, 100(1), 33-49.

Wang, L.F.S. and Tomaru, Y., 2015. The feasibility of privatization and foreign penetration. International Review of Economics & Finance, 39, 36-46.

Xu, L.-L. Lee, S.-H. and Matsumura, T. 2017. Ex-ante versus ex-post privatization policies with foreign penetration in free-entry mixed markets, International Review of Economics and Finance 50, 1-7.

Xu, L.-L. Lee, S.-H. and Wang, L.F.S., 2016. Free trade agreements and privatization policy with an excess burden of taxation, Japan and the World Economy, 37-38, 55-64.