Political Instability: The Neighbor vs. the Partner Effect

Grechyna, Daryna (2017): Political Instability: The Neighbor vs. the Partner Effect.

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of geographical neighbors on the political instability of a country and the role of a country's international relations in shaping the impact of its geographical neighbors. First, we show that political instability in neighbor countries has a strong positive impact on a given country's political instability. Second, we test whether international relations can reduce this impact of geographical neighbors. We find that more active participation in international governmental organizations is associated with lower impact of neighbor countries' political instability on a given country's political instability. Moreover, a country's dependence on its neighbors can be reduced when six or more main trade partners are non-neighbors. Our results indicate that international relations can be an efficient counterforce to the so-called "neighbor's curse."

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: political instability; geographical neighbors; neighborhood effect; international relations; trade partners.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F50 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations

References

Ades, A. and Chua, H.B., 1997. Thy neighbor's curse: regional instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(3), pp.279-304.

Aisen, A. and Veiga, F.J., 2008. The political economy of seigniorage. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), pp.29-50.

Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S. and Wacziarg, R., 2003. Fractionalization. \textit{Journal of Economic growth}, 8(2), pp.155-194.

Alesina, A., and Tabellini, G., 1990. A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt. \textit{Review of Economic Studies,} 57 (3): 403-414.

Alt J.E. and Lassen D.D., 2006. Transparency, Political Polarization, and Political Budget Cycles in OECD Countries. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3): 530--550.

Axelrod R., 1997. The dissemination of culture a model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of conflict resolution, 41(2): 203-226.

Azzimonti, M. 2011. Barriers to investment in polarized societies. The American Economic Review, 101(5): 2182-2204.

Azzimonti, M. and Talbert, M., 2014. Polarized business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 67: 47-61.

Baldassarri, D. and Bearman P., 2007. Dynamics of political polarization. American sociological review, 72(5): 784-811.

Battaglini M., Coate S., 2008. A Dynamic Theory of Public Spending, Taxation, and Debt. \textit{American Economic Review,} 98 (1): 201-236.

Bramoulle, Y., Djebbari, H. and Fortin, B., 2009. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of econometrics, 150(1), pp.41-55.

Durlauf, S.N., 2004. Neighborhood effects. Handbook of regional and urban economics, 4, pp.2173-2242.

Easterly, W. and Levine, R., 1997. Africa's growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), pp.1203-1250.

Esteban, J. and Ray, D., 2011. Linking conflict to inequality and polarization. The American Economic Review, 101(4), 1345-1374.

Fouquin, M. and Hugot, J., 2016. Two Centuries of Bilateral Trade and Gravity Data: 1827-2014. CEPII Working Paper, N2016-14, mai 2016.

Frye T., 2002. The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World. World Politics, 54(03): 308-337.

Goemans, H.E., Gleditsch, K.S. and Chiozza, G., 2009. Introducing Archigos: A dataset of political leaders. Journal of Peace research, 46(2), pp.269--283.

Goldstone, J.A., Bates, R.H., Epstein, D.L., Gurr, T.R., Lustik, M.B., Marshall, M.G., Ulfelder, J. and Woodward, M., 2010. A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), pp.190-208.

Head, K. and T. Mayer, 2014. Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook. Chapter 3 in the Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 4, eds. Gita Gopinath, Elhanan Helpman, and Kenneth S. Rogoff, Elsevier Ltd., Oxford.

Ioannides, Y.M. and Topa, G., 2010. Neighborhood effects: Accomplishments and looking beyond them. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), pp.343-362.

Iversen T. and Soskice D., 2015. Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, DOI: 10.1177/0010414015592643.

Jong-A-Pin, R., 2009. On the measurement of political instability and its impact on economic growth. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), pp.15-29.

Marshall, M. G., Marshall, D. F. R., \& Young, S. M. (1999). Memberships in conventional intergovernmental organizations, 1952-1997. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.

McCarty, N., Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H., 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, MIT Press.

Persson, T. and Svensson, L., 1989. Why a Stubborn Conservative would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-Inconsistent Preferences. \textit{The Quarterly Journal of Economics,} 104 (2): 325-345.

Teorell, Jan, Stefan Dahlberg, Sören Holmberg, Bo Rothstein, Anna Khomenko \& Richard Svensson. 2016. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, version Jan16. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, http://www.qog.pol.gu.se doi:10.18157/QoGStdJan16

Tinbergen, J., 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

Topa, G. and Zenou, Y., 2015. Neighborhood and Network Effects. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 5, pp.561-624.

Yared P., 2010. Politicians, Taxes and Debt. \textit{Review of Economic Studies,} 77 (2): 806-840.