Gürerk, Özgür and Lauer, Thomas and Scheuermann, Martin (2015): Leadership with Individual Rewards and Punishments: Do Incentives Reinforce Leading by Example?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80413.pdf Download (937kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Leading by example is considered as an important means to influence followers and to increase team performance. In most organizations, however, leading by example does not come alone. To influence followers, leaders simultaneously use a variety of instruments. Most frequently, leaders possess power to administer positive and negative incentives to followers. Do these incentives reinforce the impact of leading by example on team performance? Because of confounding factors, it is difficult to investigate leading by example using field data. Here, we investigate the effects of leading by example and its interaction with incentives on team performance in controlled laboratory experiments. We find that incentives are more effective in fostering team performance than leading by example as such. Surprisingly, leading by example’s effect on team performance interacts negatively with incentives, interestingly more so with rewards than with punishments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Leadership with Individual Rewards and Punishments: Do Incentives Reinforce Leading by Example? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Leadership; Incentives; Punishment; Reward; Leading by Example; Public Goods |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics |
Item ID: | 80413 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Özgür Gürerk |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jul 2017 19:49 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 19:20 |
References: | Balliet, D., Mulder, L. B., & Van Lange, P. A. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 137(4), 594. Bolton, G., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193. Cartwright, E., & Patel, A. (2010). Public goods, social norms, and naive beliefs. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(2), 199-223. Cartwright, E., Gillet, J., & Van Vugt, M. (2013). Leadership by Example in the Weak‐Link Game. Economic Inquiry, 51(4), 2028-2043. Fehr E., & Schmidt K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (3), 817-868. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178. Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2010). Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 16, 541-556. Foss, N. J. (2001). Leadership, beliefs and coordination: An explorative discussion. Industrial and corporate change, 10(2), 357-388. Gächter, S., & Renner, E. (2014). Leaders as role models for the voluntary provision of public goods, CESifo Working Paper, No. 5409. Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114–125. Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B., & Rockenbach, B. (2009). Motivating Teammates: The Leader’s Choice of Positive and Negative Incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 591-607. Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B., & Rockenbach, B. (2014). On cooperation in open communities. Journal of Public Economics, 120, 220–230. Güth, W., Levati, M. V., Sutter, M., & Van Der Heijden, E. (2007). Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1023-1042. Haigner, S. D., & Wakolbinger, F. (2010). To lead or not to lead: Endogenous sequencing in public goods games. Economics Letters, 108, 93-95. Harrell, A., Simpson, B., (2016). The Dynamics of Prosocial Leadership: Power and Influence in Collective Action Groups, Social Forces, 94(3), 1283-1308. Hermalin, B. E. (1998). Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. American Economic Review, 88(5), 1188-1206. Huck, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2006). Endogenous leadership in teams. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, 162(2), 253-261. Komai, M., Stegeman, M. & Hermalin, B.E. (2007). Leadership and Information. American Economic Review, 97(3), 944-947. Komai, M., Grossman, P.J., & Deters, T. (2011). Leadership and Information in a Single‐shot Collective Action Game: An Experimental Study. Managerial and Decision Economics, 32(2), 119-134. Lazear, E. (1998). Personnel economics for managers. New York: Wiley. Levati, M. V., Sutter, M., & Van der Heijden, E. (2007). Leading by example in a public goods experiment with heterogeneity and incomplete information. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(5), 793-818. Milinski, M., & Rockenbach, B. (2012). On the interaction of the stick and the carrot in social dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 139-143. Moxnes, E., & Van der Heijden, E. (2003). The effect of leadership in a public bad experiment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(6), 773-795. Nikiforakis, N. (2008). Punishment and Counter-Punishment in Public Good Games: Can We Really Govern Ourselves? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 91-112. Nosenzo, D., & Sefton, M. (2014). Promoting Cooperation: The Distribution of Reward and Punishment Power, in: O'Gorman, R., Henrich, J., & Van Vugt, M. (2009). Constraining free riding in public goods games: designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 323-329. Potters, J., Sefton, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study. Economic Theory, 33(1), 169-182. Sahin, S. G., Eckel, C., & Komai, M. (2015). An experimental study of leadership institutions in collective action games. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 100-113. Sturm, B., & Weimann, J. (2007). Unilateral emissions abatement. Environmental economics, experimental methods, 10, 157. Sutter, M., Haigner, S., & Kocher, M. G. (2010). Choosing the Carrot or the Stick? Endogenous Institutional Choice in Social Dilemma Situations. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1540–1566. Sutter, M., & Rivas, M. F., 2014. Leadership, Reward and Punishment in Sequential Public Goods Experiments, in Reward and Punishment in Social Dilemmas, edited by P. A. M. van Lange, B. Rockenbach, T. Yamagishi. Oxford University Press. van Lange, P.A.M., Rockenbach, B. & Yamagishi, T. (Eds), Social dilemmas: New perspectives on reward and punishment. New York. Oxford University Press. Vesterlund, L. (2003). The informational value of sequential fundraising. Journal of Public Economics, 87(3), 627-657. Weber, R. (2015). The Economics of Effective Leadership. UBS Center Public Paper #3. UBS International Center of Economics in Society. University of Zurich. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80413 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Leadership with Individual Rewards and Punishments. (deposited 22 Jul 2015 06:09)
-
Leadership with Individual Rewards and Punishments: Do Incentives Reinforce Leading by Example? (deposited 07 Oct 2016 17:11)
- Leadership with Individual Rewards and Punishments: Do Incentives Reinforce Leading by Example? (deposited 26 Jul 2017 19:49) [Currently Displayed]
-
Leadership with Individual Rewards and Punishments: Do Incentives Reinforce Leading by Example? (deposited 07 Oct 2016 17:11)