Agarwal, Samiksha and Chakraborty, Lekha (2018): Who Bears the Corporate Tax Incidence? Empirical Evidence from India.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_85186.pdf Download (755kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Against the backdrop of corporate tax policy changes in India, the paper attempts to measure the incidence of corporate income tax in India under a general equilibrium setting. Using seemingly uncorrelated regression coefficients and dynamic panel estimates, we tried to analyze both the relative burden of corporate tax borne by capital and labor and the efficiency effects of corporate income tax. The data for the study is compiled from corporate firms listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) for the period 2000–15. Our empirical estimates suggest that in India capital bears more of the burden of corporate taxes than labor. However, the results vary with different proxies of capital used in the models. Though it is contrary to the Harberger (1962) hypothesis that the burden of corporate tax is shifted to labor rather than capital, it confirms the existing empirical results in the context of India.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Who Bears the Corporate Tax Incidence? Empirical Evidence from India |
English Title: | Who Bears the Corporate Tax Incidence? Empirical Evidence from India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Corporate Tax; Tax Incidence; Capital; Labor |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H22 - Incidence H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies |
Item ID: | 85186 |
Depositing User: | Lekha S Chakraborty |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2018 14:29 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 22:30 |
References: | REFERENCES Anderson, T.W., and C. Hsiao. 1981. “Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(375): 598–606. Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen R. Bond. 1991. “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–97. Arulampalam, Wiji, Michael P. Devereux, and Giorgia Maffini. 2007. “The Incidence of Corporate Income Tax on Wages.” Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper No. 07. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Auerbach, Alan J. 2005. “Who Bears the Corporate Tax? A Review of What We Know.” NBER Working Paper No. 11686. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Caroll, Robert. 2009. “Corporate Taxes and Wages: Evidence from the 50 States.” Tax Foundation Working Paper No.8. Washington, DC: Tax Foundation. Clausing, Kimberly A. 2013. “Who Pays the Corporate Tax in a Global Economy.” National Tax Journal 66(1): 151–84. De Loecker, Jan. 2007. “Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia.” Journal of International Economics 73(1): 69–99. Desai, Mihir A., C. Fritz Foley, and James R. Hines, Jr. 2007. “Labor and capital shares of the corporate tax burden: international evidence.” Paper prepared for International Tax Forum 2007, Washington, DC. December 18. Available at: http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Desaietal2007.pdf Felix, Alison R. 2007. “Passing the Burden: Corporate Tax Incidence in Open Economies.” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Working Paper RRWP 07-01. Kansas City, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Fuest, C., A. Peichl, and S. Siegloch. 2017. “The incidence of corporate taxation and its implications for tax progressivity.” Blog post, VoxEU. Available at: http://voxeu.org/article/incidence-corporate-taxation-and-implications-tax-progressivity Griliches, Z., and J. Mairesse. 1995. “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5067. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Harberger, Arnold C. 1962. “The Incidence of the Corporation Income Tax.” Journal of Political Economy 70(3): 215–40. Hassett, Kevin A., and Aparna Mathur. 2006. “Taxes and Wages.” American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research Working Paper No.128. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Levinsohn, James, and Amil Petrin. 2003. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables.” The Review of Economic Studies 70(2): 317–41. Levinsohn, James, Amil Petrin, and Brian P. Poi. 2004. “Production function estimation in Stata using inputs to control for unobservables.” The Stata Journal 4(2): 113–23. Marschak, J., and W. Andrews. 1944. “Random simultaneous equations and the theory of production.” Econometrica 12(3–4): 143–205. Olley, Steven G., and Ariel Pakes. 1996. “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry.” Econometrica 64(6): 1263–97. Pavcnik, N. 2000. “Trade Liberalization, Exit and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7852. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Randolph, William C. 2006. “International Burdens of the Corporate Income Tax.” Congressional Budget Office Working Paper Series 2006-09. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office. Sarma, K. S. R. N., and M. J. K. Thavaraj. 1971. “Estimation of Tax Incidence in India.” Economic and Political Weekly 6(19): 957–64. Shome, Parthasarathi. 1978. “The incidence of the Corporation Tax in India: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Oxford Economic Papers, New Series 30(March): 64–73. Van Beveren, Ilke. 2010. “Total Factor Productivity Estimation: A Practical Review.” Journal of Economic Surveys 26(1): 98–128. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2009. “On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables.” Economic Letters 104(3): 112–14. Zellner, Arnold. 1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(298): 348–68. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/85186 |