Nishi, Hiroshi (2018): A Dynamic Analysis of Demand and Productivity Growth in a Two-sector Kaleckian Model.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_86778.pdf Download (184kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study extends a two-sector Kaleckian model of growth and income distribution by incorporating the dynamics of labour productivity growth. The economy is composed of investment goods and consumption goods producing sectors, with the sectoral demand and productivity growth interaction dynamically formalized. The study analyses the conditions for the cyclical demand and productivity growth phenomena in a two-sector economy. The model reveals that each sector may present a different response in capacity utilization rate to a change in sectoral income distribution. These phenomena are specific to two-sector models, and cannot be observed with a conventional aggregate growth model.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Dynamic Analysis of Demand and Productivity Growth in a Two-sector Kaleckian Model |
English Title: | A Dynamic Analysis of Demand and Productivity Growth in a Two-sector Kaleckian Model |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Kaleckian model, Two-sector economy, Effective demand, Productivity growth |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models |
Item ID: | 86778 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Hiroshi Nishi |
Date Deposited: | 21 May 2018 10:43 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:24 |
References: | Barbosa-Filho, N. and L. Taylor (2006)‘Distributive and Demand Cycles in the US Economy: A Structuralist Goodwin Model’, Metroeconomica, 57 (3), pp. 389-411. Baumol, W. (1967)‘Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis’, American Economic Review, 57 (3), pp. 415-426. Bhaduri, A. and S. Marglin (1990)‘Unemployment and the Real Wage: the Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14 (4), pp. 375-393. Blecker, R. A. (2011)‘Open Economy Models of Distribution and Growth’, pp. 215-239. in Hein and Stockhammer (2011). Cassetti, M. (2006)‘A Note on the Long-Run Behavior of Kaleckian Models’, Review of Political Economy, 18 (4), pp. 497-508. Dutt, A. K. (1984)‘Stagnation, Income Distribution and Monopoly Power’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8 (1), pp. 25-40. Dutt, A. K. (1990) Growth, Distribution, and Uneven Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dutt, A. K. (1997)‘Profit-rate Equalization in the Kalecki-Steindle Model ofand the ”Over determination Problem”’, The Manchester School, LXV (4), pp. 443-451. Fazzari, S., B. Blinder A. Hubbard. G., Petersen and J. Poterba (1988)‘Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988 (1), pp. 141-206. Franke, R. (2000)‘Optimal Utilization of Capital and a Financial Sector in a Classical Gravitation Process’, Metroeconomica, 51 (1), pp. 40-66. Fujita, S. (2015)‘Mark-up Pricing, Sectoral Dynamics, and the Traverse Process in a Two-Sector Kaleckian Economy’, Kyoto University Graduate School of Economics Discussion Paper Series, E-15-005. Hein, E. and E. Stockhammer eds. (2011) A Modern Guide to Keynesian Macroeconomics and Economic Policies, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar. Lavoie, M. (1995)‘The Kaleckian Model of Growth and Distribution and Its Neo-Ricardian and Neo-Marxian Critiques’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (6), pp. 789-818. Lavoie, M. (2014) Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Lavoie, M. and P. Ramirez-Gaston (1997)‘Travers in a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model of Growth with Target-Return Pricing’, The Manchester School, 65 (2), pp. 145-169. Lavoie, M. and E. Stockhammer eds. (2013) Wage-led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Murakami, H. (2017)‘A Two-sector Keynesian Model of Business Cycles’, Metroeconomica, pp. 1-29. Onaran, O. and T. Obst (2016)‘Wage-led Growth in the EU15 Member-states: The Effects of Income Distribution on Growth, Investment, Trade Balance and Inflation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40 (6), pp. 1517-1551. Park, M.S. (1997)‘Accumulation, Capacity Utilization and Distribution’, Contributions to Political Economy, 16. Rowthorn, R. E. (1981)‘Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth’, Thames Papers in Political Economy, pp. 1-39, Autumn. Sasaki, H., R. Sonoda and S. Fujita (2013)‘International Competition and Distributive Class Conflict in an Open Economy Kaleckian Model’, Metroeconomica, 64 (4), pp. 683-715. Setterfield, M. (2016)‘Wage- versus Profit-led Growth after 25 Years: An Introduction’, Review of Keynesian Economics, 4 (4), pp. 367-372. Stockhammer, E. (2017)‘Wage-led versus Profit-led Demand: What Have We Learned? A Kaleckian-Minskyan View’, Review of Keynesian Economics, 5 (1), pp. 25-42. Storm, O. and C.W.M. Naastepad (2012) Macroeconomics beyond the NAIRU, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Storm, S. and C. W. M. Naastepad (2017)‘Bhaduri-Marglin Meet Kaldor-Marx: Wages, Productivity, and Investment’, Review of Keynesian Economics, 5 (1), pp. 4-24. Taylor, L. (1985)‘A Stagnation Model of Economic Growth’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9 (4), pp. 383-403. Taylor, L. (2004) Reconstructing Macroeconomics: Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/86778 |