Hamzah, Nurrawaida Husna and Masih, Mansur (2018): Revisiting effectiveness of interest rate as a tool to control inflation: evidence from Malaysia based on ARDL and NARDL.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_87576.pdf Download (586kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Public policy remains a paradox and a challenging pursuit in finding a delicate balance between conflicting economic goals and outcomes. Nevertheless, interest rate is a commonly used monetary policy tool to maintain a low and stable inflation. However, the effectiveness of interest rate in controlling inflation remains unanswered conclusively. Undertaking a wrong policy stance will lead to huge costs to the economy and society as a whole. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the lead-lag relationship between inflation and interest rate, and whether the relationship between the two variables is linear. These will determine whether interest rate is an effective tool in the context of Malaysia. This study extends prior literature by using a more recent monthly time series data and advanced techniques known as NARDL and ARDL. Based on this study, it is found that inflation rate is the most exogenous variable while interest rate is the most endogenous variable, hence policy makers have no influence over inflation. A crucial policy implication is policy makers should not use interest rate to control inflation but instead, they should focus on supply side policies to manage inflation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Revisiting effectiveness of interest rate as a tool to control inflation: evidence from Malaysia based on ARDL and NARDL |
English Title: | Revisiting effectiveness of interest rate as a tool to control inflation: evidence from Malaysia based on ARDL and NARDL |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Monetary policy, NARDL, ARDL, Inflation, Interest rate |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates |
Item ID: | 87576 |
Depositing User: | Professor Mansur Masih |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jun 2018 15:57 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:55 |
References: | Bonga-Bonga, L. (2017). Assessing the effectiveness of the monetary policy instrument during the inflation targeting period in South Africa. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 1 -19. Cioran, Z. (2014). Monetary policy, inflation and the causal relation between the inflation rate and some of the macroeconomic variables. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 391-401. Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–431. Engle, R. and Granger, C. (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, 55, 251-276. Giap T, K., & Cheng, C. S. (1995). The causal nexus of money, output and prices in Malaysia. Applied Economics, 27(12), 1245-1251. Gokal, V., & Hanif, S. (2004). Relationship between inflation and economic growth. Economics Department, Reserve Bank of Fiji. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 84, 1551-1580. Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990) “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Application to the Demand for Money” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P. and Y. Shin (1992) “Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?” Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178. Ma, S., & Park, S. (2005). Dynamic relationship between interest rate and inflation: the case of Korea. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 1(4), 217-221. Masih, M. & Al-Hajji, M. & Umar, Y. (2008). Empirical test of the long-run fisher effect: an application of the ardl bounds technique to Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Finance and Economics. 8. 53 - 64. Masson, P. R., Savastano, M. A., & Sharma, S. (1998). Can inflation targeting be a framework for monetary policy in developing countries?. Finance and development, 35(1), 34. Nchor, D., & Darkwah, S. A. (2015). Inflation, Exchange Rates and Interest Rates in Ghana: an Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(3), 969-977. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. Poon, W. C., & Tong, G. K. (2009). The feasibility of inflation targeting in Malaysia. Economics Bulletin, 29(2), 1035-1045. Roger, S. (2010). Inflation targeting turns 20. Finance and Development, 47(1), 46-49. Shin, Y., Yu, B., Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in an ARDL framework. In: Horrace, W.C., Sickles, R.C. (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer Science and Business Media, New York. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/87576 |