Schmitz, Patrick W. (2014): Optimal Ownership of Public Goods Reconsidered. Published in: Economics Letters , Vol. 125, (2014): pp. 21-24.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91457.pdf Download (121kB) |
Abstract
Consider a non-governmental organization (NGO) that can invest in a public good. Should the government or the NGO own the public project? In an incomplete contracting framework with split-the-difference bargaining, Besley and Ghatak (2001) argue that the party who values the public good most should be the owner. We demonstrate the robustness of their insight when the split-the-difference rule is replaced by the deal-me-out solution. Our finding is in contrast to the private good results of Chiu (1998) and De Meza and Lockwood (1998), who show that the optimal ownership structure crucially depends on whether the split-the-difference rule or the deal-me-out solution is used.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Optimal Ownership of Public Goods Reconsidered |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ownership; incomplete contracts; investment incentives; public goods; bargaining |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L31 - Nonprofit Institutions ; NGOs ; Social Entrepreneurship |
Item ID: | 91457 |
Depositing User: | Patrick W. Schmitz |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jan 2019 15:35 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 11:12 |
References: | Besley, T., Ghatak, M., 2001. Government versus private ownership of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1343--1372. Binmore, K., Morgan, P., Shaked, A., Sutton, J., 1991. Do people exploit their bargaining power? An experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 3, 295--322. Binmore, K., Shaked, A., Sutton, J., 1989. An outside option experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 753--770. Chiu, Y.S., 1998. Noncooperative bargaining, hostages, and optimal asset ownership. American Economic Review 88, 882--901. Chiu, Y.S., Yang, B.R., 1999. The outside option, threat point, and Nash bargaining solution. Economics Letters 62, 181--188. De Meza, D., Lockwood, B., 1998. Does asset ownership always motivate managers? Outside options and the property rights theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 361--386. De Meza, D., Lockwood, B., 2004. Spillovers, investment incentives and the property rights theory of the firm. Journal of Industrial Economics 52, 229--253. Donahue, J.D., Zeckhauser, R.J., 2011. Collaborative governance: Private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton University Press. Francesconi, M., Muthoo, A., 2011. Control rights in complex partnerships. Journal of the European Economic Association 9, 551--589. Goldlücke, S., Schmitz, P.W., 2014. Investments as signals of outside options. Journal of Economic Theory 150, 683--708. Grimsey, D., Lewis, M., 2004. Public private partnerships: The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar Publishing. Grosjean, P., 2010. Maintenance costs, outside options and optimal ownership of a public good. BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 10. Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D., 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94, 691--719. Halonen-Akatwijuka, M., 2012. Nature of human capital, technology and ownership of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 96, 939--945. Halonen-Akatwijuka, M., Pafilis, E., 2009. Reputation and ownership of public goods. University of Bristol, CMPO Working Paper 09/211. Halonen-Akatwijuka, M., Pafilis, E., 2014. Location and ownership of public goods. Economics Letters, forthcoming, doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2014.04.003. Hart, O.D., 1995. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford University Press. Hart, O., 2011. Thinking about the firm: A review of Daniel Spulber's The Theory of the Firm. Journal of Economic Literature 49, 101--113. Hart, O.D., Moore, J., 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1119--1158. Hart, O., Moore, J., 1999. Foundations of incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies 66, 115--138. Hart, O., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1997. The proper scope of government: theory and application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1127--1161. Hoppe, E.I., Schmitz, P.W., 2010. Public versus private ownership: Quantity contracts and the allocation of investment tasks. Journal of Public Economics 94, 258--268. Maskin, E., Tirole, J., 1999. Unforeseen contingencies, property rights, and incomplete contracts. Review of Economic Studies 66, 83--114. Muthoo, A., 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge University Press. Schmitz, P.W., 2006. Information gathering, transaction costs, and the property rights approach. American Economic Review 96, 422--434. Schmitz, P.W., 2013. Incomplete contracts and optimal ownership of public goods. Economics Letters 118, 94--96. Segal, I., Whinston, M.D., 2013. Property rights. Handbook of Organizational Economics, 100--158. Tirole, J., 1999. Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand? Econometrica 67, 741--781. Yescombe, E.R., 2011. Public-private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance. Butterworth-Heinemann. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91457 |