Financial Stability of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Saudi Arabia: Evidence using Pooled and Panel Models

Ghassan, Hassan B. and Taher, Farid B. (2015): Financial Stability of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Saudi Arabia: Evidence using Pooled and Panel Models. Published in: Book: Islamic Finance: Risk, Stability and Growth , Vol. 2, No. Chapter 3 at http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1df4hmj (January 2015): pp. 81-114.

Abstract

The financial crises are considered the major challenges facing the prosperity and stability of the banking system and menace its stability. Several studies on the financial and banking sector have demonstrated that Islamic banks have shown more financial robustness and stability compared to conventional banks, over periods of financial crises. This research aims to measure the stability extent of the Saudi Arabia banks including Islamic banks and conventional banks using quarterly data from 2005 to 2011. This period is characterized by the global financial crisis shocks (2007-2008). The sample used is composed of six banks including two Islamic banks (AlRajhi Bank and AlBilad Bank) and four traditional banks (Riyad Bank, Saudi Investment Bank, Saudi British Bank and Saudi American Bank). This sample represents an important part of 64% of the Saudi banking sector and covers close to two-thirds of banks whose shares are traded on the Saudi stock market. The research focuses on three types of variables related to bank, banking system and macroeconomic levels. The paper is based on quantitative tools using panel regression and pooled regression to model the z-score index for testing the banks' stability in Saudi Arabia. The panel data model shows that Islamic banks reduce relatively the value of the financial stability index; meanwhile, they contribute efficiently to enhance the financial stability through the diversification of their assets. The findings indicate those Riyad Bank and SAMBA groups support efficiently the financial stability of banking sector, while AlRajhi bank has a positive but moderate role in enhancing the banking sector stability. The Saudi banking sector has relatively less level of competitiveness, that affecting negatively the financial stability. The limited representation of Islamic banks in the Saudi banking sector jeopardizes any efforts to improve the financial stability index.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Islamic Banks, Financial Crisis, Financial Stability, Z-score Model, Saudi Arabia.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation

References

1. AlKholi, H. (2009). Impacts of Financial Crisis on Banking Sector. [Online] Available at http://www.iifef.org/node/1154 [Accessed 4th March 2013].

2. Altman, E. (1983).Corporate Financial Distress. John Willey & Sons Inc., New York.

3. Aragonés, J. R., C. Blanco, and Dowd, K. (2001). “Incorporating Stress Tests into Market Risk Modeling”, Derivatives Quarterly, Spring, 44-49.

4. Ariss, T. R. (2010). “Competitive conditions in Islamic and conventional banking: a global perspective”, Review of Financial Economics, 19, 101-108.

5. Bank for International Settlements, BIS (2000). Stress Testing by Large Financial Institutions: Current Practices and Aggregation Issues. Basel, Switzerland: Committee on the Global Financial System, April.

6. CIBAFI, (2010). Principles of Financial Moderation, Ten Principles for Creating a Balanced and Just Financial and Banking System. Comprehensive Summary.

7. Chapra, M. U. (2000a). “Why has Islam Prohibited Interest? The Rationale behind the Prohibition of Interest”, Review of Islamic Economics, 9, 5-20.

8. Chapra, M. U. and Khan, T. (2000b). Regulation and Supervision of Islamic Banks. Occasional Paper 3, IDB, IRTI, 1-109.

9. Čihak, M. and Hesse, H. (2010). “Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 38 (2), 95-113.

10. Čihak, M. and Hesse, H. (2008). Islamic Banks and Financial Stability: An Empirical Analysis. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/08/16, January, 1-29.

11. Čihak, M. (2007). “Systemic Loss: A Measure of Financial Stability”, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 57(1-2), 5-26.

12. Hadri, K. (1999). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root in Panel Data with Serially Correlated Errors. Manuscript. Department of Economics and Accounting, University of Liverpool, 1999.

13. Hadri, K. (2000). “Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data”, Econometric Journal, 3,148–161.

14. Hasan, M. and Dridi, J. (2010). The effects of the Global Crisis on Islamic Banks and Conventional Banks: A Comparative Study. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 10/201.

15. Hassan, M. Kabir (2006). “The X-Efficiency in Islamic Banks”, Islamic Economic Studies, 13(2), 49-78.

16. Ghassan, B. H., F. B. Taher, and Adhailan, S. S. (2011). “The impacts of International Financial Crisis on Saudi Arabia Economy: SVAR model”, Islamic Economic Studies, 17(2), 1-34.

17. Heij, Ch., P. de Boer, P. H. Franses, T. Kloek, and Van Dijk, H. K. (2004). Econometric Methods with Applications in Business and Economics. First edition, Oxford University Press. ISBN 0–19–926801–03579108642.

18. Holton, G. A. (2003). Value at Risk: Theory and Practice. Academic Press, USA.

19. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2003). “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panel”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.

20. Imam, P. and Kpodar, K. (2010). Islamic Banking: How it is diffused? International Monetary Fund Working Paper 10/195.

21. Maechler, A., Mitra, S. and Worrell, D. (2005). Exploring Financial Risks and Vulnerabilities in New and Potential EU member States. Second Annual DG Oct. 6-7, ECFIN Research Conference.

22. Manganelli, S., and Engle, R. F. (2001). Value at Risk Models in Finance. ECB Working Paper Series 75, August, 1-40.

23. Strobel, F. (2010). “Bank insolvency risk and aggregate Z-score measures: a caveat”, Economics Bulletin, 30(4), 2576-2578.

24. Siddiqi, M. N. (2000). “Islamic Banks: Concept, Percept, and Prospects”, Review of Islamic Economics, 9, 21-36.