User-Specified General-to-Specific and Indicator Saturation Methods

Sucarrat, Genaro (2019): User-Specified General-to-Specific and Indicator Saturation Methods.

Abstract

General-to-Specific (GETS) modelling provides a comprehensive, systematic and cumulative approach to modelling that is ideally suited for conditional forecasting and counterfactual analysis, whereas Indicator Saturation (ISAT) is a powerful and flexible approach to the detection and estimation of structural breaks (e.g. changes in parameters), and to the detection of outliers. To these ends, multi-path backwards elimination, single and multiple hypothesis tests on the coefficients, diagnostics tests and goodness-of-fit measures are combined to produce a parsimonious final model. In many situations a specific model or estimator is needed, a specific set of diagnostics tests may be required, or a specific fit criterion is preferred. In these situations, if the combination of estimator/model, diagnostics tests and fit criterion is not offered by publicly available software, then the implementation of user-specified GETS and ISAT methods puts a large programming-burden on the user. Generic functions and procedures that facilitate the implementation of user-specified GETS and ISAT methods for specific problems can therefore be of great benefit. The R package gets, version 0.20 (September 2019), is the first software - both inside and outside the R universe - to provide a complete set of facilities for user-specified GETS and ISAT methods: User-specified model/estimator, user-specified diagnostics and user-specified goodness-of-fit criteria. The aim of this article is to illustrate how user-specified GETS and ISAT methods can be implemented.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Model selection, R, general-to-specific, indicator saturation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C87 - Econometric Software

References

D. Bates and M. Maechler (2018). Matrix: Sparse and Dense Matrix Classes and Methods, 2018. URL https: //CRAN.R-project.org/package=Matrix. R package version 1.2-15.

J. Campos, D. F. Hendry, and N. R. Ericsson (2005). General-to-Specific Modeling. Volumes 1 and 2. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.

J. Castle, J. Doornik, D. F. Hendry, and F. Pretis (2015). Detecting Location Shifts During Model Selection by Step-Indicator Saturation. Econometrics, 3:240–264. DOI 10.3390/econometrics3020240.

J. A. Doornik and D. F. Hendry (2018). Empirical Econometric Modelling - PcGive 15. Timberlake Consultants Ltd., London.

E. Dubois and E. Micheaux (2016). Grocer 1.72: an econometric toolbox for Scilab. http://dubois.ensae. net/grocer.html.

D. F. Hendry, S. Johansen, and C. Santos (2008). Automatic selection of indicators in a fully saturated regression. Computational Statistics, 23:317–335. DOI 10.1007/s00180-007-0054-z.

K. D. Hoover and S. J. Perez (1999). Data Mining Reconsidered: Encompassing and the General-to-Specific Approach to Specification Search. Econometrics Journal, 2:167–191. Dataset and code: http: //www.csus.edu/indiv/p/perezs/Data/data.htm.

M. C. Lovell (1983). Data Mining. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65:1–12.

F. Pretis, J. Reade, and G. Sucarrat (2018). Automated General-to-Specific (GETS) Regression Modeling and Indicator Saturation for Outliers and Structural Breaks. Journal of Statistical Software, 86:1–44.

G. Schwarz (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6:461–464.

G. Sucarrat (2019). gets: General-to-Specific (GETS) Modelling and Indicator Saturation (ISAT) Methods. R package version 0.20. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gets.