Paul Baran’s Economic Surplus Concept, the Baran Ratio, and the Decline of Feudalism

Lambert, Thomas (2020): Paul Baran’s Economic Surplus Concept, the Baran Ratio, and the Decline of Feudalism.

Abstract

In his book, the Political Economy of Growth (1957), and in an article he wrote several years earlier (1953), the economist Paul A. Baran noted how in an economic system characterized by a hierarchy of classes and where economic and political power are concentrated in the top class of such a system, the amount of output and income above what is consumed by most people (e.g., food, clothing, housing, public safety, education) mostly goes to the top class. This extra amount is what he called the economic surplus, a form of savings or income left over after consumption. In a feudalistic system, there is little incentive to use the proceeds of this type of surplus to buy more tools and equipment for more production of output and income. The lord or baron has little incentive to lend or give serfs money because he may not benefit from any increased productivity by them. It is with capitalism that such incentives to re-invest in production become important. This paper uses recently published and estimated historical data to illustrate Baran’s observations and thoughts on feudalism. It is shown that during the 13th and 14th centuries in England that the economic surplus declined, and this decline helps to explain the “crisis of feudalism” that started in the 13th century. It is not until several centuries later when capitalism becomes the dominant economic system that the economic surplus begins to rise on a consistent basis probably due to the reinvestment of a portion of the surplus into productive activities and a greater ratio of capital income to rental income and a greater ratio of investment to economic surplus. However, and somewhat surprisingly, by the 19th Century the surplus still does not attain levels reached in the 13th Century.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: Baran ratio, Dobb-Sweezy debate, economic surplus, capitalism, feudalism, GDP, national income
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B24 - Socialist ; Marxist ; Sraffian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian; N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N13 - Europe: Pre-1913

References

Allen, Robert C. 2011. “Why the Industrial Revolution was British: Commerce, Induced Innovation, and the Scientific Revolution.” Economic History Review 64(2): 357-84.

Allen, Robert C. 2015. “The High Wage Economy and the Industrial Revolution.” Economic History Review 68(1): 1-22.

Baran, Nicholas and John Bellamy Foster, eds. 2017. The Age of Monopoly Capital: Selected Correspondence of Paul M. Sweezy and Paul A. Baran, 1949-1964. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Baran, Paul A. 1953. “Economic Progress and Economic Surplus.: Science & Society, 17(4), 289-317. Retrieved February 18, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/40400214 .

Baran, Paul A. 1957. The Political Economy of Growth. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Baran, Paul A, and Paul M. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Brenner, Robert. 1976. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past & Present, (70): 30-75. Retrieved March 7, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/650345

Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M., & Van Leeuwen, B. 2015. British Economic Growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107707603 .

Clark, Gregory. 2009. “The Macroeconomic Aggregates for England, 1209-2008”, UC Davis, Economics WP 09-19. http://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/data.html . Accessed on February 23, 2020.

Cockshott, Paul. 2019. How the World Works: The Story of Human Labor from Prehistory to the Modern Day. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Dimmock, Spencer. 2014. The Origin of Capitalism in England, 1400–1600. Series: Historical Materialism Book Series, Volume: 74. London, UK: Brill Publishers. Dobb, Maurice. 1947. Studies in the Development of Capitalism. New York, NY: International Publishers.

Engels, Friedrich. 1957 (1884). “The Decline of Feudalism and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie.” Monthly Review April 1957, pp. 445-454. Originally written in 1884 and from an unfinished manuscript discovered amongst Engels posthumous papers: "Ueber den Verfall des Feudalismus and das Aufkommen der Bourgeoisie", Berlin DDR, 1953. https://marxists.catbull.com/archive/marx/works/1884/decline/index.htm . Accessed on October 29, 2019.

Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.

Lipson, E. 1959. The Economic History of England, Volume 1, The Middle Ages. London: Adam and Charles Black Publishers.

McDonald, John. 2002. Productive Efficiency in Doomsday England, 1086. London, UK: Routledge Publishers.

Resnick, Stephen., and Richard Wolff. 1979. “The Theory of Transitional Conjunctures and the Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism in Western Europe.” Review of Radical Political Economics, 11(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/048661347901100302 Accessed on March 8, 2020.

Sweezy, Paul M. 1976 (1950). “A Critique,” in The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism, edited by Hilton, Rodney, London, UK: NLB, pages 33-56. Originally published with Dobb in Science and Society, Spring 1950: Sweezy, Paul M., and Maurice Dobb. "The Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism." Science & Society 14, no. 2 (1950): 134-67.

US Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1929-2018. Table 1.1.3. Real Gross Domestic Product, Quantity Indexes. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&step=2#reqid=19&step=2&isuri=1&1921=survey . Accessed on February 27, 2020.

US Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1929-2018. Table 4.7. Investment in Private Nonresidential Fixed Assets by Industry Group and Legal Form of Organization. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=10&step=2 . Accessed on February 27, 2020.

US Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1929-2018. Table 5.2.5. Gross and Net Domestic Investment by Major Type. https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=19&step=2#reqid=19&step=2&isuri=1&1921=survey . Accessed on February 27, 2020.

US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1947-2019. “Annual Nonfarm Business Output per Worker, Percent change from same quarter a year ago.” www.bls.gov Accessed on March 11, 2020.

Xu, Zhun. 2019. “Economic Surplus, the Baran Ratio, and Capital Accumulation.” Monthly Review, 70(10). March 2019. https://monthlyreview.org/2019/03/01/economic-surplus-the-baran-ratio-and-capital-accumulation/ . Accessed on March 4, 2020.