Verbic, Miroslav (2007): Supplementary pension insurance in Slovenia: an analysis with an overlapping-generations general equilibrium model.
Download (525kB) | Preview
The article presents an analysis of supplementary pension insurance in Slovenia and its subsequent effects on welfare, macroeconomic variables and pension fund deficit with a dynamic OLG general equilibrium model. It has been established that the volume of supplementary pension saving is insufficient at present in Slovenia to compensate the deterioration of rights from the first pension pillar. Not only is the participation in the (voluntary) second pillar insufficient, but especially the premia are too low. The macro-economic consequences of introducing a fully-funded mandatory component of pension insurance would not be unfavourable. Increased pension saving reduces current consumption and increases the labour supply of active generations, but also increases the volume of disposable savings, so the increased investment may increase capital stock and production, which leads to an increase in economic growth and potential future consumption. Increased labour supply of insured persons would also lead to a higher volume of contributions for mandatory pension insurance, which would reduce the state pension fund deficit.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Supplementary pension insurance in Slovenia: an analysis with an overlapping-generations general equilibrium model|
|Keywords:||general equilibrium models; mandatory second pillar; macroeconomic effects; OLG-GE; Slovenia; supplementary pension saving; welfare analysis|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models
G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J32 - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Private Pensions
D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice and Growth > D91 - Intertemporal Consumer Choice; Life Cycle Models and Saving
D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
|Depositing User:||Miroslav Verbic|
|Date Deposited:||09. Sep 2008 06:16|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 05:28|
Armington, P. S. 1969. “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” IMF Staff Paper no. 16. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
Arrow, K. J., and G. Debreu. 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy.” Econometrica 22, no. 3: 265-290.
Auerbach, A. J., and L. J. Kotlikoff. 1987. Dynamic Fiscal Policy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Balistreri, E. J., and R. H. Hillberry. 2003. “Estibration: An Illustration of Structural Estimation as Calibration.” Mimeo. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
Böhringer, C., T. F. Rutherford, and W. Wiegard. 2003. “Computable General Equilibrium Analysis: Opening a Black Box.” Discussion Paper no. 56. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim.
Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Raman. 1998. GAMS: A User's Guide. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation.
Deaton, A. 1992. Understanding Consumption. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
European Commission. 2001. Competitiveness and Social Cohesion: Implications for Candidate Countries. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Ferris, M. C., and T. S. Munson. 2000. GAMS/PATH User Guide: Version 4.3. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation.
Friedman, M. 1957. A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mathiesen, L. 1985. “Computation of Economic Equilibria by a Sequence of Linear Complementarity Problems.” In Economic Equilibrium: Model Formulation and Solution, ed. A. S. Manne, 144-162. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Modigliani, F., and R. Brumberg. 1954. “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data.” In Post Keynesian Economics, ed. K. K. Kurihara, 388-436. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Modigliani, F. 1986. “Life Cycle, Individual Thrift, and the Wealth of Nations.” The American Economic Review 76, no. 3: 297-313.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2000. Reforms for an Ageing Society. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Rutherford, T. F. 1995. “Constant Elasticity of Substitution Functions: Some Hints and Useful Formulae.” Mimeo. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Rutherford, T. F. 1995a. “Extensions of GAMS for Complementarity Problems Arising in Applied Economic Analysis.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19, no. 8: 1299-1324.
Stanovnik, T., and S. Kukar. 1995. Medgeneracijski transferji dohodka v Sloveniji [Intergenerational Transfers of Income in Slovenia]. Ljubljana: Institute for Economic Research.
Stanovnik, T. 2002. “The Political Economy of Pension Reform in Slovenia.” In Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Volume 2: Restructuring of Public Pension Schemes: Case Studies of the Czech Republic and Slovenia, ed. E. Fultz, 19-74. Budapest: International Labour Organization, Central and Eastern European Team.
Stanovnik, T. 2004. “The Pension System of Slovenia after the 1999 Reform: Developments and Challenges.” Paper prepared for the tripartite conference Recent Developments in Pension Restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. International Labour Organization, Budapest.
Verbič, M., B. Majcen and R. van Nieuwkoop. 2006. “Sustainability of the Slovenian Pension System: An Analysis with an Overlapping-generations General Equilibrium Model.” Eastern European Economics 44, no. 4: 60-81.
Verbič, M. 2007. Dinamični model splošnega ravnovesja slovenskega gospodarstva s poudarkom na pokojninskem sistemu [A Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Slovenian Economy with Emphasis on the Pension System]. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences.