Juodis, Arturas and Karavias, Yiannis and Sarafidis, Vasilis (2020): A Homogeneous Approach to Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102992.pdf Download (447kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper develops a new method for testing for Granger non-causality in panel data models with large cross-sectional (N) and time series (T) dimensions. The method is valid in models with homogeneous or heterogeneous coefficients. The novelty of the proposed approach lies on the fact that under the null hypothesis, the Granger-causation parameters are all equal to zero, and thus they are homogeneous. Therefore, we put forward a pooled least-squares (�fixed effects type) estimator for these parameters only. Pooling over cross-sections guarantees that the estimator has a sqrt(NT) convergence rate. In order to account for the well-known "Nickell bias", the approach makes use of the well-known Split Panel Jackknife method. Subsequently, a Wald test is proposed, which is based on the bias-corrected estimator. Finite-sample evidence shows that the resulting approach performs well in a variety of settings and outperforms existing procedures. Using a panel data set of 350 U.S. banks observed during 56 quarters, we test for Granger non-causality between banks' profitability and cost efficiency.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Homogeneous Approach to Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Panel Data; Granger Causality; VAR; Nickell bias; Bias Correction; Fixed Effects |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models |
Item ID: | 102992 |
Depositing User: | Vasilis Sarafidis |
Date Deposited: | 22 Sep 2020 09:57 |
Last Modified: | 22 Sep 2020 09:57 |
References: | Altunbas, Y., S. Carbo, E. P. Gardener, and P. Molyneux (2007): “Examining the relationships between capital, risk and efficiency in European banking,” European Financial Management, 13, 49-70. Anderson, T. W. and C. Hsiao (1982): “Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 18, 47-82. Ando, T. and J. Bai (2016): “Clustering Huge Number of Financial Time Series: A Panel Data Approach with High-dimensional Predictors and Factor Structures,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 1182-1198. Arellano, M. (1987): “Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-groups Estimators,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49, 431-434. Arellano, M. (2016): “Modeling Optimal Instrumental Variables for Dynamic Panel Data Models,” Research in Economics, 70, 238-261. Bai, J. (2009): “Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects,” Econometrica, 77, 1229-1279. Binder, M., C. Hsiao, and M. H. Pesaran (2005): “Estimation and Inference in Short Panel Vector Autoregressions with Unit Root and Cointegration,” Econometric Theory, 21, 795-837. Chambers, M. J. (2013): “Jackknife Estimation of Stationary Autoregressive Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 172, 142-157. Chudik, A. and M. H. Pesaran (2015): “Common Correlated Effects Estimation of Heterogeneous Dynamic Panel Data Models with Weakly Exogenous Regressors,” Journal of Econometrics, 188, 393-420. Chudik, A., M. H. Pesaran, and J.-C. Yang (2018): “Half-Panel Jackknife Fixed Effects Estimation of Panels with Weakly Exogenous Regressor,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 33, 816-836. Cui, G., V. Sarafidis, and T. Yamagata (2020): “Large IV Estimation of Spatial Dynamic Panels with Interactive Effects: Large Sample Theory and an Application on Bank Attitude Toward Risk,” Working Paper MPRA Paper No. 102488, Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Dhaene, G. and K. Jochmans (2015): “Split-panel Jackknife Estimation of Fixed-Effect Models,” Review of Economic Studies, 82, 991-1030. Dumitrescu, E.-I. and C. Hurlin (2012): “Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels,” Economic Modelling, 29, 1450 - 1460. Fernandez-Val, I. and J. Lee (2013): “Panel Data Models with Nonadditive Unobserved Heterogeneity: Estimation and Inference,” Quantitative Economics, 4, 453-481. Granger, C. W. J. (1969): “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods,” Econometrica, 37, 424-438. Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner (2002): “Asymptotically Unbiased Inference for a Dynamic Panel Model with Fixed Effects When Both N and T are Large,” Econometrica, 70(4), 1639-1657. Holtz-Eakin, D., W. K. Newey, and H. S. Rosen (1988): “Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data,” Econometrica, 56, 1371-1395. Im, K. S., M. Pesaran, and Y. Shin (2003): “Testing or Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53 - 74. Juodis, A. (2013): “A Note on Bias-corrected Estimation in Dynamic Panel Data Models,” Economics Letters, 118, 435-438. Juodis, A. (2018): “First Difference Transformation in Panel VAR models: Robustness, Estimation and Inference,” Econometric Reviews, 37, 650-693. Juodis, A., H. Karabiyik, and J. Westerlund (2020): “On the Robustness of the Pooled CCE Estimator,” Journal of Econometrics, (forthcoming). Juodis, A. and V. Sarafidis (2018): “Fixed T dynamic panel data estimators with multifactor errors,” Econometric Reviews, 37, 893-929. Juodis, A. and V. Sarafidis (2020): “A linear estimator for factor-augmented fixed-T panels with endogenous regressors,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 0, 1-15. Karavias, Y. and E. Tzavalis (2016): “Local Power of Fixed-T Panel Unit Root Tests With Serially correlated Errors and Incidental Trends,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 37, 222-239. Karavias, Y. and E. Tzavalis (2017): “Local Power of Panel Unit Root Tests Allowing for Structural Breaks,” Econometric Reviews, 36, 1123-1156. Lin, C. and S. Ng (2012): “Estimation of Panel Data Models with Parameter Heterogeneity when Group Membership is Unknown,” Journal of Econometric Methods, 1, 42-55. Lopez, L. and S. Weber (2017): “Testing for Granger causality in panel data,” The Stata Journal, 4, 972-984. Neyman, J. and E. L. Scott (1948): “Consistent Estimation from Partially Consistent Observations,” Econometrica, 16, 1-32. Nickell, S. (1981): “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects,” Econometrica, 49, 1417-1426. Pesaran, M. H. (2006): “Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure,” Econometrica, 74, 967-1012. Pesaran, M. H. (2012): “On the interpretation of panel unit root tests,” Economics Letters, 116, 545-546. Robertson, D. and V. Sarafidis (2015): “IV Estimation of Panels with Factor Residuals,” Journal of Econometrics, 185, 526-541. Sarafidis, V. and N. Weber (2015): “A Partially Heterogeneous Framework for Analyzing Panel Data,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77, 274-296. Zhu, H., V. Sarafidis, and M. J. Silvapulle (2020): “A new structural break test for panels with common factors,” Econometrics Journal, 23, 137-155. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102992 |