Активность и кооперация университета, бизнеса и государства в Акмолинской области Республики Казахстан

Myrzakhmet, Marat and Myrzakhmet, Zhanat and Myrzakhmet, Bolat (2021): Активность и кооперация университета, бизнеса и государства в Акмолинской области Республики Казахстан.

Abstract

The paper is aimed at studying the interaction of regional universities with the environment (enterprises and regional authorities) in the regions of Kazakhstan with the mining and metallurgical industries. Regional universities and their surroundings are studied using webometric methods. Universities with large Internet sites are more inclined to cooperate in their innovation activities but are inert in terms of activity. At the same time, smaller universities are more active. Less cooperation or activity in the educational field, for example, may indicate that the university in the preparation and implementation of educational programs is more focused on its preferences and requirements of the state (which allocates grants for education), rather than on the market and the wishes of employers. Therefore, small universities focused on the local market are naturally more active. There are correlations between webometric data and data from enterprise reporting, for example, a direct relationship between innovation potential and the number of employees in an enterprise. The activity and innovative potential of enterprises correlate well with the number of employees, and the degree of popularity on the websites of the region and universities correlates well with the amount of income and tax paid. Regional universities should strengthen their structural flexibility (cooperation of factors within themselves) and as well as to establish broad interaction with enterprises in the region. The results of the study will analyze the current industrial policy and consider several management decisions facing both authorized bodies, in particular the Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development Republic of Kazakhstan and associations of industrialists and entrepreneurs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Activity and cooperation of the university, business, and government in the Akmola region of Kazakhstan
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: Innovation potential, educational potential, resource potential, production potential, regional university, university model, webometric method, cooperation, Akmola region, Kazakhstan, mining industry.
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L16 - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics: Industrial Structure and Structural Change ; Industrial Price Indices; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P25 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R38 - Government Policy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy

References

1 Alexander, A., & Manolchev, C. (2020). The future of university or universities of the future: a paradox for uncertain times. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2020-0018.

2 Anderson, R.D. (2004), Germany and the Humboldtian Model. In European Universities from the Enlightenment to 1914. Oxford Scholarship Online. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206606.003.0004.

3 Alexander, A., Martin, D. P., Manolchev, C., & Miller, K. (2020). University–industry collaboration: using meta-rules to overcome barriers to knowledge transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9685-1

4 Cranfield, D. (2008). Knowledge Management and Higher Education: A UK Case Study. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2).

5 Reeve, F. & Gallagher, J. (2000). Researching the Implementation of Work-based Learning within Higher Education: Questioning Collusion and Resistance. Adult Education Research Conference. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2000/papers/73

6 Rybnicek, R., & Königsgruber, R. (2019). What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics, 89(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6.

7 Clauss, T., & Kesting, T. (2017). How businesses should govern knowledge-intensive collaborations with universities: An empirical investigation of university professors. Industrial Marketing Management, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.09.001.

8 Sarpong, D., AbdRazak, A., Alexander, E., & Meissner, D. (2017). Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.032.

9 Vick, T. E., & Robertson, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of UK university- industry collaboration for knowledge transfer: A future research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCX086

10 Kitagawa, F., & Lightowler, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education. Research Evaluation, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs035.

11 Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007

12 Francis-Smythe, J. (2008). Enhancing academic engagement in knowledge transfer activity in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603100802181109.

13 Lockett, N., Kerr, R., & Robinson, S. (2008). Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between higher education institutions and industry. International Small Business Journal, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242608096088.

14 Ankrah, S. N., Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., & Shaw, N. E. (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit. Technovation, 33(2–3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.001.

15 Rossi, F., & Rosli, A. (2014). Indicators of university–industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914914.

16 Perkmann, M., King, Z., & Pavelin, S. (2011). Engaging excellence? Effects of faculty quality on university engagement with industry. Research Policy, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007.

17 Lawson, C. (2013). Academic patenting: The importance of industry support. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9266-7.

18 Evans, S., & Scarbrough, H. (2014). Supporting knowledge translation through collaborative translational research initiatives: “Bridging” versus “blurring” boundary-spanning approaches in the UK CLAHRC initiative. Social Science and Medicine, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025.

19 Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., & Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9031-5.

20 Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2012). Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: New evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes017.

21 Dooley, L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710776734.

22 Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. (2011). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010.

23 Marcos, J., & Denyer, D. (2012). Crossing the sea from They to We? The unfolding of knowing and practising in collaborative research. Management Learning, 43(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612440232.

24 Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2013). The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9229-4.

25 Gertner, D., Roberts, J., & Charles, D. (2011). University-industry collaboration: A CoPs approach to KTPs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111151992.

26 Sparrow, J., Tarkowski, K., Lancaster, N., & Mooney, M. (2009). Evolving knowledge integration and absorptive capacity perspectives upon university-industry interaction within a university. Education and Training, 51(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910911005217.

27 Bishop, K., D’Este, P., & Neely, A. (2011). Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.009.

28 D’Este, P., Guy, F., & Iammarino, S. (2013). Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs010.

29 Sharifi, H., Liu, W., & Ismail, H. S. (2014). Higher education system and the ‘open’ knowledge transfer: a view from perception of senior managers at university knowledge transfer offices. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818645.

30 Orazbayeva, B., Plewa, C., Davey, T., & Muros, V. G. (2019). The Future of University-Business Cooperation: Research and Practice Priorities. In Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M (Vol. 54). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.10.001.

31 Laukkanen, M. (2003). Exploring academic entrepreneurship: Drivers and tensions of university-based business. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000310504684.

32 Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. In Pinter Publishers, London.

33 Etzkowitz, H. (1993). Enterprises from science: The origins of science-based regional economic development. Minerva, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098626.

34 Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix - -University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1).

35 Dzisah, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix circulation: the heart of innovation and development. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1386/ijtm.7.2.101_1.

36 Meyer, J. W. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506.

37 Hladchenko, M., & Pinheiro, R. (2019). Implementing the Triple Helix Model: Means-Ends Decoupling at the State Level? Minerva, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9355-3.

38 Nyman, G. S. (2015). University-business-government collaboration: from institutes to platforms and ecosystems. Triple Helix, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0014-x.

39 Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Solazzi, M. (2012). A bibliometric tool to assess the regional dimension of university-industry research collaborations. Scientometrics, 91(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0577-5.

40 Zhang, N., Williams, I. D., Kemp, S., & Smith, N. F. (2011). Greening academia: Developing sustainable waste management at Higher Education Institutions. Waste Management, 31(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.006.

41 Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. In MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203216675.

42 Zamanbekov, S. Z. (2013). Cluster development concept of Kazakhstan engineering on innovative basis. Life Science Journal, 10(4).

43 Tolysbayev, B. S., Kirdasinova, K. A., & Sabirova, R. (2015). Industrial innovative policy of Kazakhstan: Current status and development prospects. Actual Problems of Economics, 171(9).

44 Serikkaliyeva A.E. (2016). Chinese investment in the mining and metallurgical complex of Kazakhstan. Journal of Oriental Studies, 78(3), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.26577/jos-2016-3-874

45 Karenov, R. S., Orynbassarova, Y. D., Romanko, Y. B., & Kazbekov, T. B. (2016). The mining and metallurgical industry of Kazakhstan: Current state of problems, and strategic development priorities. Mathematics Education, 11(7).

46 Sikhimbayev, M., Shugаiроvа, Z., Orynbassarova, Y., & Dzhazykbaeva, B. (2019). Readiness for changes among managers of mining and metallurgy industry: A case of Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-XXI, 177(5–6). https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V177-09.

47 Alimbaev, T., Mazhitova, Z., Beksultanova, C., & Tentigulkyzy, N. (2020). Activities of mining and metallurgical industry enterprises of the Republic of Kazakhstan: Environmental problems and possible solutions. E3S Web of Conferences, 175. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017514019.

48 Кабаков Р.И. R в действии. Анализ и визуализация данных в программе R / пер. с англ. Полины А. Волковой. – М.: ДМК Пресс, 2014. – 588 с.: ил. ISBN 978-5-947060-077-1