Matsue, Toyoki (2022): Role of worker flows in the relationship between job offers and employment.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115319.pdf Download (535kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study investigates the mechanism determining changes in job offers and analyzes the role of worker flows in the relationship between job offers and employment. It applies a queueing system to dynamic general equilibrium models and analyzes economic fluctuations. The queueing system helps in considering the relationship between job offers and employment and changes in job offers in response to shocks. The numerical simulations indicate that worker flows influence changes in job offers in response to a productivity shock. Although employment fluctuations remain constant, changes in job offers amplify when fewer workers join and/or more workers leave the firm, whereas they decrease when more workers join and/or fewer workers leave. The shock responses of other variables in each model are in line with the reactions of the standard dynamic general equilibrium models. These findings provide important insights into labor market dynamics.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Role of worker flows in the relationship between job offers and employment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | queueing system; job offer; wmployment fluctuation; wconomic fluctuation; wfficiency wage |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J20 - General J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages ; Payment Methods |
Item ID: | 115319 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Toyoki Matsue |
Date Deposited: | 10 Nov 2022 08:30 |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2022 10:44 |
References: | Akerlof, G.A., 1982. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Q. J. Econ. 97, 543–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885099. Blanchard, O., Galí, J., 2010. Labor markets and monetary policy: A New Keynesian model with unemployment. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.2.1. Cabo, F., Martín-Román, A., 2019. Dynamic collective bargaining and labor adjustment costs. J. Econ. 126, 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-018-0615-3. Campbell III, C.M., 1994. Wage change and the quit behavior of workers: Implications for efficiency wage theory. South. Econ. J. 61, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/1060135. Chiarini, B., Piselli, P., 2005. Business cycle, unemployment benefits and productivity shocks. J. Macroecon. 27, 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2004.07.002. Collard, F., de la Croix, D., 2000. Gift exchange and the business cycle: The fair wage strikes Back. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 3(1), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1999.0075. Danthine, J.P., Kurmann, A., 2004. Fair wages in a New Keynesian model of the business cycle. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 7(1), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2003.07.001. de la Croix, D., de Walque, G., Wouters, R., 2009. A note on inflation persistence in a fair wage model of the business cycle. Macroecon. Dyn. 13(5), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100509080304. Deutsch, Y., David, I., 2020. Benchmark policies for utility-carrying queues with impatience. Queueing Syst. 95(10), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-019-09642-x. Feigin, P., Landsberger, M., 1981. The existence and properties of a stationary distribution for unemployment when job search is sequential. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 3, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(81)90025-7. Furlanetto, F., 2011. Fiscal stimulus and the role of wage rigidity. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 35, 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.11.004. Galí, J., 1999. Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? Am. Econ. Rev. 89(1), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.249. Gomme, P., 1999. Shirking, unemployment and aggregate fluctuations. Int. Econ. Rev. 40(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.00002. Goux, D., Maurin, E., Pauchet, M., 2001. Fixed-term contracts and the dynamics of labour demand. Eur. Econ. Rev. 45(3), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00061-1. Hamermesh, D.S., Pfann, G.A., 1996. Adjustment costs in factor demand. J. Econ. Lit. 34(3), 1264–1292. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729502. Kaufman, B.E., 2002. Models of union wage determination: What have we learned since Dunlop and Ross? Ind. Relat. 41(1), 110–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-232X.00238. Leduc, S., Liu, Z., 2016. Uncertainty shocks are aggregate demand shocks. J. Mon. Econ. 82, 20–35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2016.07.002. Lendvai, J., Raciborski, R., Vogel, L., 2013. Macroeconomic effects of an equity transaction tax in a general-equilibrium model. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 37(2), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2012.09.010. Lindé, J., 2009. The effects of permanent technology shocks on hours: Can the RBC-model fit the VAR evidence? J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 33(3), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2008.08.011. Mandelman, F.S., Zanetti, F., 2014. Flexible prices, labor market frictions and the response of employment to technology shocks. Labour Econ. 26, 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.11.004. Martin, C., Wang, B., 2020. Search, shirking and labor market volatility. J. Macroecon. 66, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2020.103243. Mitra, K., Evans, G.W., Honkapohja, S., 2019. Fiscal policy multipliers in an RBC model with learning. Macroecon. Dyn. 23(1), 240–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100516001176. Mumtaz, H., Zanetti, F., 2016. The effect of labor and financial frictions on aggregate fluctuations. Macroecon. Dyn. 20(1), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100514000406. Salop, S.C., 1979. A model of the natural rate of unemployment. Am. Econ. Rev. 69(1), 117–125. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1802502. Sattinger, M., 2010. Queueing and searching. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1590998. Shapiro, C., Stiglitz, J.E., 1984. Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. Am. Econ. Rev. 74(3), 433–444. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1804018. Stiglitz, J.E., 1974. Alternative theories of wage determination and unemployment in LDC’s: The labor turnover model. Q. J. Econ. 88(2), 194–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883069. Tripier, F., 2006. Sticky prices, fair wages, and the co-movements of unemployment and labor productivity growth. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 30(12), 2749–2774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2005.09.002. Weiss, A., 1980. Job queues and layoffs in labor markets with flexible wages. J. Polit. Econ. 88(3), 526–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/260884. Wesselbaum, D., 2011. Sector-specific productivity shocks in a matching model. Econ. Model. 28, 2674–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.08.009. Zanetti, F., 2019. Financial shocks, job destruction shocks, and labor market fluctuations. Macroecon. Dyn. 23, 1137–1165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100517000190. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115319 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Role of worker flows in the relationship between job offers and employment. (deposited 09 Nov 2022 14:24)
- Role of worker flows in the relationship between job offers and employment. (deposited 10 Nov 2022 08:30) [Currently Displayed]