Non-orthodox Economic Approaches to Labor Unions and Union Leadership

Drakopoulos, Stavros A. (2024): Non-orthodox Economic Approaches to Labor Unions and Union Leadership. Forthcoming in: Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality (edited by Marques, J.). (2024)

Abstract

This short paper is the entry on Encyclopedia of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality (edited by Marques, J.). Springer, Cham, 2024. The entry describes the role, function, and nature of labor unions and their leadership from a non-orthodox perspective. It shows that since the end of the 19th century, a division between orthodox and non-orthodox approaches toward the study of labor unions can be discerned. The orthodox framework was formed in the late 19th century with the gradual establishment of Marginalism, and it consolidated itself with the dominance of early neoclassical economics. Orthodox economic theory did not devote much attention to the economic analysis of unions. On the contrary and during the same period, non-orthodox economists such as Sidney and Beatrice Webb and early institutionalists, had paid considerable attention to the study of unions, perceiving them as politico-economic organizations and emphasizing their wider role as social institutions. The legacy of those two approaches continued in the 20th century and contemporary analyses of labor unions. The orthodox approach (originating mainly from the work of John Dunlop), generally conceives unions as purely economic units, analogous to firms, which can be studied by applying the standard tools of microeconomic theory. In this framework, the notion of union leadership plays a minimum role. In contrast, the non-orthodox viewpoint (originating mainly from Arthur Ross’ works), embraces a holistic, institutional-political-based attitude to the study of labor unionism.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Trade Unions; Labor Union Leadership, Gender inequality
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J51 - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J70 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M50 - General

References

Atherton, W. (1973) Theory of Union Bargaining Goals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Booth, A. (1995) The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boyer, G. and Smith, R. (2001) The Development of the Neoclassical Tradition in Labor Economics. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54(2): 199-223.

Burton, John. (1984) The Economic Analysis of the Trade Union as a Political Institution. In Jean-Jacques Rosa (ed.), The Economics of Trade Unions: New Directions, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff: 123–54.

Dean, M., and Perrett, R. (2020) Overcoming barriers to women's workplace leadership: insights from the interaction of formal and informal support mechanisms in trade unions, Industrial Relations Journal, 51: 169–184.

Drakopoulos, S. and Katselidis, I. (2014) The Development of Trade Union Theory and Mainstream Economic Methodology. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(4): 1133-1149.

Drakopoulos, S. and Katselidis, I. (2023) The Old Institutional School and Labour Market Functions and Policies. In Drakopoulos, S. and Katselidis, I. (eds), Economic Policy and the History of Economic Thought, London: Routledge: 141-158.

Dunlop, J. (1944) Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: Macmillan.

Fortin‐Bergeron, C., Doucet, O. and Hennebert, MA (2018) The role of management and trade union leadership on dual commitment: The mediating effect of the workplace relations climate. Human Research Management Journal, 28: 462–478.

Gall, G. and Fiorito, J. (2012) Toward a better theory on the relationship between commitment, participation, and leadership in unions. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(8): 715-731.

Hammer, T., Bayazit, B. and Wazeter, D. (2009), Union leadership and member attitudes: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2): 392-410.

Kahn, R.L. and Tannenbaum, A.S. (1957), Union leadership and member participation. Personnel Psychology, 10(3): 286-92.

Kaufman, B. E. (2000) The Early Institutionalists on Industrial Democracy and Union Democracy. Journal of Labor Research 21(2): 189-209.

Kaufman, B. E. (2002) Models of Union Wage Determination: What Have We Learned Since Dunlop and Ross? Industrial Relations 41(1): 110-158.

Kirton, G. (2015). The Coalition of Labor Union Women: Still a Space of Social Creativity and a Force for Social Change? Labor Studies Journal, 40(2): 129–148.

Ledwith, S. (2012). Gender politics in trade unions. The representation of women between exclusion and inclusion. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(2): 185–199.

Ledwith, S., and Munakamwe, J. (2015). Gender, union leadership, and collective bargaining: Brazil and South Africa. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 26(3): 411-429.

McNulty, P. J. (1980) The Origins and Development of Labor Economics: A Chapter in the History of Social Thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Metochi, M. (2002) The influence of leadership and member attitudes in understanding the nature of union participation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(1): 87-111.

Parks, J.M., Gallagher, D.G. and Fullagar, C. (1995) Operationalizing the outcomes of union commitment: the dimensionality of participation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(6): 533-55.

Pemberton, J. (1988) A Managerial Model of the Trade Union. Economic Journal 98:755–7.

Perlman, M. (1960) Labor Movement Theories: Past, Present, and Future. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 13: 338-348.

Ross, A. (1947) The Trade Union as a Wage-fixing Institution. The American Economic Review 37(4): 566-588.

Ross, A. (1948) Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rutherford, M. (2011) The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918-1947: Science and Social Control. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sadler, J. (2012) The importance of multiple leadership roles in fostering participation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(8): 779-796.

Webb, S. and B. Webb (1897) Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans, Green.