Income Redistribution Policy, Growth, Inequality, and Employment: A Long-Run Kaleckian Approach

Sasaki, Hiroaki and Sonoda, Ryunosuke (2024): Income Redistribution Policy, Growth, Inequality, and Employment: A Long-Run Kaleckian Approach.

Abstract

This study investigates how the income redistribution policy affects economic growth, employment, income distribution, income inequality, and asset inequality. The income redistribution policy is defined as one that imposes capital taxation on capitalists and redistributes it to workers. Therefore, we constructed a Kaleckian model in which, in addition to capitalists, workers own capital stock through savings. Depending on the relative size of workers' and capitalists' saving rates, we obtained the Pasinetti equilibrium, in which both classes coexist, and the dual equilibrium, in which only workers own capital stock, whereas capitalists do not. In the Pasinetti equilibrium, raising the tax rate for capitalists drives an increase in workers' assets and income shares. Simultaneously, economic growth and employment rates increase when the short-run equilibrium is wage-led growth whereas they decrease when the short-run equilibrium is profit-led growth. Hence, the income redistribution policy is effective in reducing inequality and promoting economic growth and employment when the short-run equilibrium is wage-led.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: workers' saving; income equality; income redistribution policy; growth; employment
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E64 - Incomes Policy ; Price Policy; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J53 - Labor-Management Relations ; Industrial Jurisprudence

References

B"ohm, V. and Kaas, L. (2000) ``Differential Savings, Factor Shares, and Endogenous Growth Cycles'' {it Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24, pp. 965--980.

Cassetti, M. (2003) ``Bargaining Power, Effective Demand and Technical Progress: A Kaleckian Model of Growth,'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (3), pp. 449--64.

Cassetti, M. (2006) ``A Note on the Long-run Behaviour of Kaleckian Models,'' Review of Political Economy 18 (4), pp. 497--508.

Commendatore, P. and Palmisani, C. (2009) ``The Pasinetti--Solow Growth Model with Optimal Saving Behaviour: A Local Bifurcation Analysis'' in C. H. Skiadas, I. Dimotikalis, and C. Skiadas (eds.) {it Topics on Chaotic Systems: Selected Papers from CHAOS 2008 International Conference, World Scientific: Singapore

Dalgaard, C.-J. and Hansen, J. W. (2005) ``Capital Utilization and the Foundations of Club Convergence,'' {it Economics Letters 87 (2), pp. 145--152.

Dutt, A. K. (1987) ``Alternative Closures Again: A Comment on Growth, Distribution and Inflation,'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 11 (1), pp. 75--82.

Dutt, A. K. (1992) ``Conflict Inflation, Distribution, Cyclical Accumulation and Crises,'' European Journal of Political Economy 8 (4), pp. 579--597.

Dutt, A. K. (2006) ``Aggregate Demand, Aggregate Supply and Economic Growth,'' International Review of Applied Economics 20 (3), pp. 319--336.

Ederer, S. and Rehm, M. (2020) ``Will Wealth Become More Concentrated in Europe? Evidence from a Calibrated Post-Keynesian Model,'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 44, pp. 55--71.

Faria, J. R. and Araujo, R. A. (2004) ``An Intertemporal Pasinettian Model with Government Sector,'' {it International Journal of Business and Economics 3 (3), pp. 257--268.

Faria, J. R. and Teixeira, J. R. (1999) ``Growth and stability in a model with Pasinettian saving behaviour and neoclassical technology,'' The Manchester School 67 (1), pp. 111--121.

Flaschel, P and Skott, P. (2006) ``Steindlian Models of Growth and Stagnation,'' Metroeconomica 57 (3), pp. 303--338.

Furuno, Y. (1970) ``Convergence time in the Samuelson--Modigliani model,'' {it The Review of Economic Studies 37 (2), pp. 221--232.

G'oes, G. S. and Teixeira, J. R. (2022) ``Growth and Income Distribution: The Heritage Effect on the Capital Accumulation Process,'' {it Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 61, pp. 458--462.

Kaldor, N., (1956) ``Alternative Theories of Distribution,'' {it Review of Economic Studies 23, pp. 83--100.

Kumar, R., Schoder, C., and Radpour, S. (2018) ``Demand Driven Growth and Capital Distribution in a Two Class Model with Applications to the United States,'' {it Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 47, pp. 1--8.

Kurose, K. (2022) ``A Two-Class Economy from the Multi-Sectoral Perspective: the Controversy between Pasinetti and Meade--Hahn--Samuelson--Modigliani revisited,'' Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 19 (1), pp. 239--270.

Lima, G. T. (2004) ``Endogenous Technological Innovation, Capital Accumulation and Distributional Dynamics,'' Metroeconomica 55 (4), pp. 386--408.

Lima, G. T., Carvalho, L., and Serra, G. P. (2021) ``Human Capital Accumulation, Income Distribution, and Economic Growth: A Demand-Led Analytical Framework,'' Review of Keynesian Economics 9 (3), pp. 319--336.

Marglin, S. and Bhaduri, A. (1990) Profit Squeeze and Keynesian Theory in S. Marglin and J. Schor (eds.) The Golden Age of Capitalism: Reinterpreting the Postwar Experience, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mattauch, L., Edenhofer, O., Klenert, D., and B'ernard, S. (2016) ``Distributional Effects of Public Investment when Wealth and Classes are Back,'' Metroeconomica 67 (3), pp. 603--629.

Michl, T. R. (2009) {it Capitalists, Workers and Fiscal Policy: A Classical Model of Growth and Distribution, Harvard University Press: Cambridge MA.

Michl, T. R. and Foley, D. K. (2004) ``Social Security in a Classical Growth Model,'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 28, pp. 1--20.

Milanovic, B. (2016) Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization, Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Ohno, T. (2022) ``Capital-Labor Conflict in the Harrodian Model,'' Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 19, pp. 301--317.

Pasinetti, L. L. (1962) ``Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth,'' {it Review of Economic Studies 29 (4), pp. 267--279.

Petach, L. and Tavani, D. (2020) ``Income Shares, Secular Stagnation, and the Long-Run Distribution of Wealth,'' Metroeconomica 71 (1), pp. 235--255.

Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Samuelson, P. A. and Modigliani, F. (1966) ``The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models,'' {it Review of Economic Studies 33, pp. 269--301.

Sasaki, H. (2010) ``Endogenous Technological Change, Income Distribution, and Unemployment with Inter-Class Conflict,'' Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 21 (2) pp. 123--134.

Sasaki, H. (2013) ``Cyclical Growth in a Goodwin--Kalecki--Marx Model,'' Journal of Economics 108 (2), pp. 145--171.

Sasaki, H. (2022) ``Growth and Income Distribution in an Economy with Dynasties and Overlapping Generations,'' Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 19 (1), pp. 215--238.

Sedgley, N. and Elmslie, B. (2004) ``The Conventional Wage Share vs. Full Employment: Implications for the Development of Growth Theory,'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 28, pp. 875--888.

Taylor, L. (2014) ``The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti and John Maynard Keynes,'' International Journal of Political Economy 43 (3), pp. 4--17.

Taylor, L., Foley, D. K., and Rezai, A. (2019) ``Demand drives growth all the way: Goodwin, Kaldor, Pasinetti and the Steady State,'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 43 (5), pp. 1333--1352.

Zamparelli, L. (2017) ``Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An `Anti-Dual' Pasinetti Economy,'' Metroeconomica 68 (4). pp. 927--946.