The Evolution of Behavioral Economics in Policy Design: A Critical Review (2015–2025)

Baker, Maher Asaad (2025): The Evolution of Behavioral Economics in Policy Design: A Critical Review (2015–2025).

Abstract

Purpose: This paper provides a critical synthesis of the key developments in the application of behavioral economics (BE) to public policy from 2015 to 2025. It analyzes the field's institutionalization, the evolution of its core concepts, and the significant critiques that have shaped its modern trajectory. Design/methodology/approach: This article is a comprehensive literature review, synthesizing findings from published academic papers, institutional reports, and meta-analyses. It systematically maps empirical findings across policy domains and critically examines ethical, methodological, and practical challenges. Findings: The review finds that BE has matured from a novel tool into an established field. Mechanisms like defaults, framing, and friction reduction have been widely deployed with varying success. This period has also been defined by a critical reckoning with the replication crisis and ethical debates concerning autonomy. The field is responding by integrating with computational social science and artificial intelligence, moving toward more interdisciplinary and empowering approaches. Originality/value: This review offers a nuanced, critical analysis of a pivotal decade in behavioral public policy. It moves beyond cataloging interventions to provide a coherent narrative of institutionalization, challenge, and adaptation. The paper concludes that the field's value lies in fostering a more realistic, evidence-based, and human-centric paradigm for policy design.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: behavioral economics, literature review, policy design, nudge, choice architecture, public policy, policy design
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D04 - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation, Implementation, and Evaluation; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D90 - General; H - Public Economics > H0 - General > H00 - General

References

1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences; Committee on Future Directions for Applying Behavioral Economics to Policy, Beatty, A., Moffitt, R., & Buttenheim, A. (Eds.). (2023). Behavioral Economics: Policy Impact and Future Directions. National Academies Press (US). https://doi.org/10.17226/26874 2. Sanchayan Banerjee, Peter John, Behavioral public policy: past, present, & future, Policy and Society, 2025; puaf012, https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf012 3. Geiger, N. (2016). Behavioural Economics and Economic Policy: A comparative study of recent trends. OEconomia, 6–1, 81–113. https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.2230 4. Moseley, A. (2020, July 30). Nudging in Public Policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved 19 Sep. 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-949 5. Adkisson, R. V. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. The Social Science Journal, 45(4), 700–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2008.09.003 6. The Ethics of Nudging - Yale Journal on Regulation. (2022, November 3). Yale Journal on Regulation. https://www.yalejreg.com/print/the-ethics-of-nudging/ 7. Default (option/setting) (2024). The Behavioral Economics Institute, BehavioralEconomics.com. 8. Jachimowicz, J. M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(02), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.43 9. Fischer, K. (2024, July 11). Everything you need to know about the framing effect | REBOOT FOUNDATION. REBOOT FOUNDATION | Promoting and Developing Critical Thinking Tools and Resources. https://reboot-foundation.org/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-framing-effect/ 10. In the frame: how policy choices are shaped by the way ideas are presented | BIT. (2024, October 22). BIT. https://www.bi.team/blogs/in-the-frame-how-policy-choices-are-shaped-by-the-way-ideas-are-presented/ 11. Beatty, A., Moffitt, R., & Buttenheim, A. (2023, April 20). The Behavioral Economics Toolkit: Policy Levers and Intervention Strategies. Behavioral Economics - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593511/ 12. Broers, V. J. V., De Breucker, C., Van den Broucke, S., & Luminet, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice. European journal of public health, 27(5), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx085 13. Talat, U., Schmidtke, K. A., Khanal, S., Chan, A., Turner, A., Horne, R., Chadborn, T., Gold, N., Sallis, A., & Vlaev, I. (2022). A Systematic review of nudge interventions to optimize medication prescribing. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.798916 14. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (2025, February 13). Mind shift, green lift: Six behavioural science trends for environmental policy - Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. https://oecd-opsi.org/publications/mind-shift-green-lift-six-behavioural-science-trends-for-environmental-policy/ 15. Engelen, B., & Schmidt, A. (2020). The Ethics of Nudging: An Overview. Tilburg University Research Portal. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/the-ethics-of-nudging-an-overview 16. Wikipedia contributors. (2025, September 15). Replication crisis. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 15:27, September 19, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Replication_crisis&oldid=1311415916. 17. Replication crisis. (2021, December 8). Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/replication-crisis 18. Ansari, S. (2021, November 6). Criticisms of behavioral economics. Economics Online. https://www.economicsonline.co.uk/behavioural_economics/criticisms_of_behavioural_economics.html/ 19. Bhargava, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Behavioral Economics and Public Policy 102: Beyond nudging. American Economic Review, 105(5), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151049 20. Ispp, & Ispp. (2025, February 21). How Behavioural Economics Can Improve Public Policy Outcomes - ISPP. Indian School of Public Policy -. https://www.ispp.org.in/how-behavioural-economics-can-improve-public-policy-outcomes-real-world-applications-insights/ 21. New York City Bar Association. (2025, February 6). Top Trends of 2024 in Behavioral Science, digital Tech, data, and AI. https://www.nycbar.org/reports/top-trends-of-2024-in-behavioral-science-digital-tech-data-and-ai/