Marjit, Sugata and Kar, Saibal and Maiti, Dibyendu (2008): Labor market reform and poverty – the role of informal sector. Published in: NEW AND ENDURING THEMES IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS: edited by Bhaskar Dutta, Tridip Ray & E Somanathan: NY: World Scientific, 2009 (May 2009): pp. 229-240.
Download (139kB) | Preview
Recent papers, discussing the impact of economic reform in India, argue that the positive effect of reform is more significant in states, which are not ‘labor friendly’. Also labor market reforms seem to be a pre-condition for success of liberal policies as far as their impact on poverty is concerned. We argue that the exact mechanism behind such a link is yet to be clarified. We try to provide such a mechanism in terms of a general equilibrium model involving formal and informal workers. Our framework is capable of providing such a link and shows that there are occasions when such link is violated.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Labor market reform and poverty – the role of informal sector|
|Keywords:||Informal labor, capital mobility, labor market reform|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements
|Depositing User:||Saibal Kar|
|Date Deposited:||21. Jul 2010 06:10|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 15:16|
Agenor, P.R. and Montiel, P. J. (1996). Development Macroeconomics, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Besley, T. and Burgess, R. (2004). Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 91-134. Carruth, A. and Oswald, A. J. (1981). The Determination of Union and Non-Union Wage Rates, European Economic Review, 16, pp. 285-302.
Central Statistical Organisation (CSO). Annual Survey of Industries, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, New Delhi, Government of India, various years.
Dasgupta, I. and Marjit, S. (2006). Evasive reform: informalisation in a liberalised economy with wage-setting unions, in B. Guha-Khasnobis and R. Kanbur, (Eds.) Informal Labor Markets and Development, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Esfahani, H.S. and Salehi-Isfahani, D. (1989). Effort observability and worker productivity: toward an explanation of economic dualism, Economic Journal, 99, pp. 818-836.
Foster, Andrew and Rosenzweig, M. R. (2004). Agricultural Productivity Growth, Rural Economic Diversity, and Economic Reforms: India, 1970 2000, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52, pp. 509–542.
Hasan, R., Mitra, D. and Ural, B. P. (2006). Trade Liberalisation, Labor Market Institutions and Poverty Reduction: Evidence from Indian States, India Policy Forum 3, pp. 71-122.
Jones, R. W. (1971). The specific-factor model in trade, theory and history, in J. N. Bhagwati et al. (Eds.), Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Marjit, S. (2003). Economic reform and informal Wage: A general equilibrium analysis”, Journal of Development Economics, 72, pp. 371-80.
Marjit, S., and Maiti, D. (2006). Globalisation, economic reform and informal labor, in: B. Guha-Khasnobis and R. Kanbur, (Eds.), Informal Labor Markets and Development, NY: Palgrave- MacMillan.
Marjit, S., Kar, S., and Beladi, H. (2007). Trade reform and informal wage, Review of Development Economics, 11, pp. 313-320.
Marjit, S. and Kar, S. (2007). The urban informal sector and poverty – effects of trade reform and capital mobility in India”, MPIA-PEP-Network working Paper # 2007-09, www.pep-net.org. Topalova, Petia. (2005). Trade Liberalization, Poverty and Inequality: Evidence from Indian Districts, NBER Working Paper No. 11614, MA: NBER.