Beltramo, Theresa (2010): Changes in Bilateral Trade Costs between European Union Member States & Major Trading Partners: An Empirical Analysis from 1989 - 2006.
Download (1MB) | Preview
Today, more than 50 years after the Rome Treaty, the EU has made great strides in its’ economic integration and liberalization of movement of goods and people. International trade theory predicts deepening economic integration inside the European Union will increase regional trade and have large effects on agglomeration of industry patterns. In particular, the Core Periphery theory predicts the core of Western Europe and center of economic prosperity will spread economic growth to the periphery through increased integration. Thus, it is hoped that the EU Core, who benefit from their central location and a long history of integration in Western Europe, will increase growth to the periphery through deepening integration and a relative drop in trade costs. Critics cite the Spring 2010 debt crisis in Greece and subsequent shock to Euro zone stability as an indication that EU integration has not been successful. Given increased skepticism of the Euro zone, measuring changes in trade costs between 2001 Euro adopters and the main trading partners provides one quantitative measure to better understand the depth of EU integration in the recent period from 1989‐2006. Using the Novy (2008) model, which measures bilateral trade costs directly from trade flows, the measure includes all trade costs incurred in getting a good to its’ final user, other than the production cost of the good itself. Results show the drop in trade costs over the more recent period 1995‐2006 to be largest for trade between countries who adopt the Euro in 2001 (‐53%). The second largest drop in bilateral trade costs is between 2001 Euro adopters and the Central Eastern European Countries who joined the EU in 2004 (‐49%). The third largest drop in bilateral trade costs is between the 2001 Euro adopters group and the large non‐continental Europe trading partners (‐45%). Large differences in trade costs appear between countries within the 2001 Euro adopters who are considered members of the Core versus those in the Periphery. Over the 1995‐ 2006 period trade costs drop by 24% more for trade within the Core versus Trade between the Core and the Periphery. While the Core‐Periphery theory is slow to be realized in our empirical results of trade costs over the 1995‐2006 period; trade costs among EU members and Euro adopters are relatively large‐ 33‐53%‐ when compared to trade costs measured for the non‐continental European trading partners‐5%. This 7‐11 times larger drop in trade costs for trade intra‐EU and Euro adopter members‐ both original and accession‐ is an empirical testament to the EU’s success at integrating diverse economies within the union.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Changes in Bilateral Trade Costs between European Union Member States & Major Trading Partners: An Empirical Analysis from 1989 - 2006|
|Keywords:||International Trade, Core-Periphery, and Economic Geography.|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F47 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General
F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
|Depositing User:||Theresa Beltramo|
|Date Deposited:||09 Aug 2010 10:15|
|Last Modified:||19 Nov 2016 16:00|
Ades Alberto and Edward Glaeser. 1995. “Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 195-227.
Anderson, James and Douglas, Marcouiller. 2002. “Insecurity and the Pattern of Trade: An Empirical Investigation.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 84: 342-352.
Anderson, James and Eric, van Wincoop. 2004. “Trade costs.” Journal of Economic Literature, 42:691-751.
Anderson, James and Eric, van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review, 93: 170-192.
Bergstrand, Jeffrey. 1985. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3): 474-81.
Bergstrand, Jeffrey. 1989. “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 143-53.
Bergstrand, Jeffrey. 1990. “The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade.” The Economic Journal, 100: 1216-29.
Behrens, Kristian, Carl, Gaigné, Gianmarco, Ottaviano, and Jacques, Thisse. 2006. "Countries, regions and trade: On the welfare implications of economic integration." European Economic Review, 10.1016: 1-25.
Behrens, Kristian, Carl, Gaigné, Gianmarco, Ottaviano, and Jacques, Thisse. 2003. "Interregional and international trade: Seventy years after Ohlin." C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 4065.
Bhagwati, J. (1991) The World Trading System at Risk. Princeton: Princeton University and Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Bhagwati, Jagdish, David, Greenaway, and Arvind, Panagariya. 1998. “Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy.” The Economic Journal, 108(449): 1128-1148.
Bhagwati, J. and P. Arvine. 1996a. “Preferential Trading Areas and Multilateralism: Strangers, Friends or Foes?” Paper presented at the Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements Conference, AEI Washington D.C.
Bhagwati, Jagdish, and Panagariya, Arvine. 1996b. "The theory of preferential trade agreements: historical evolution and current trends." American Economic Review, 86: 82-7.
Deardorff, Alan. 1998. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, ed. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 7-32. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Erixon, Fredrik, Andreas, Freytag, Gernot, Pehnelt. 2007. “The Rome Treaty at 50.” ECIPE Policy Briefs 04/2007. European Environment Agency. 2002. "Indicator: Investments in transport infrastructures." http://themes.eea.europa.eu/Sectors_and_activities/transport/indicators/TERM19,2002.
Foss, Olaf, Steiner, Johansen, Mats, Johansson, and Bo, Svensson. 2000. “Regoinal Policy at a Crossroad: Sweden and Norway on Different Paths?” Paper presented at the ERSA Conference, Dortmund.
Fratianni, Michele. 2007. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade.” In Handbook of International Business 2nd edition, ed. Alan Rugman, 72-89. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fujita Masahisa., Paul, Krugman and Anthony, Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fujita, Masahisa and Tomoya Mori. 2005. “Frontiers of the New Economic Geography.” Institute of Developing Economies Discussion Paper 27.
Fujita, Masahisa and Jacques, Thisse. 2002. Economics of Agglomeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grossman, Gene, comment on Alan V. Deardorff. 1998. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, ed. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 29-31. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Jacks, David, Chrisopher Meissner, and Dennis Novy. 2008. “Trade Costs 1870-2000.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 98(2): 529-534.
Head, Keith and Thierry Mayer. 2003. “The empirics of agglomeration and trade.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, ed. Vernon Henderson and Jacques Thisse, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Helpman, Elhanan and Paul, Krugman. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Boston: MIT Press. Paul, Krugman. 1991. “Increasing returns and economic geography.” Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483-499.
Krugman, Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade. Jointly Published Leuven University Press and MIT Press. Krugman, Paul. 1980. “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” American Economic Review, 70: 950-959.
Lejour, Arjan, Hugo Rojas-Romagosa, Victor Rodriquez, Carlos Montalvo, and Frans van der zee. 2009. “Market Access at Home and Abroad.” Industrial Policy and Economic Reform Papers 10.
Nenci, Silvi. 2009. "Tariff liberalization and the growth of world trade: A comparative historical analysis to evaluate the multilateral trading system." Univeristy of Roma Tre Working Paper 110.
Novy, Dennis. 2008. “Graviy Redux: measuring international trade costs with panel data.” Working Paper University of Warwick Department of Economics.
Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth, Rogoff. 2000. “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics. Is There a Common Cause?” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, ed. Ben Bernanke and Kenneth Rogoff, 339-390. MA: MIT Press.
Portes, Richard, and Hélène, Rey. 2005. “The Determinants of Cross-Border Equity Flows.” Journal of International Economics, 65: 269-296.
Rose Andrew. 2004. “Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade?” The American Economic Review, 94(1): 98-147.
Schurmann, Carsten and Ahmed Talaat. 2002. “The European Peripherality Index.” Paper presented at the Congress of the European Regional Science Association Conference Paper, Dortmund.
Spiezia, Vincenzo. 2002. “Geographic concentration of production and unemployment in OECD countries” Working Paper OECD.
Subramanian, Arvind and Shang-Jin Wei. 2003. “The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but Unevenly.” NBER working paper 10.024.
Summers, Lawrence. 1999. "Regionalism and the world trading system." In Trade blocs: Alternative approaches to analyzing preferential trade agreements.” ed. Jagdish Bhagwati, Pravin Krishna, Arvind Panagariya, 561-65. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Tobler, Waldo. 1979. “Cellular Geography.” In Philosophy in Geography. ed.Gale, S., Olsson, G. (Ed.) Dordrecht: Reidel. Viner, Jacob. 1950. The customs union issue. New York: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Winters, Alan. 1996. "Regionalism versus multilateralism." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 1687.
Wei Shang-Jin. 1996. “Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration?” NBER Working Paper 5531.