Marco, Marini (1997): Managers Compensation and Collusive Behaviour under Cournot Oligopoly.
Download (158kB) | Preview
The aim of the present paper is to show that the existence of a concrete outside option for firms' executives can induce, under specific circumstances, every firm to adopt restrictive output practises. In particular, the paper characterizes the conditions for which, under Cournot oligopoly, existing firms behave more collusively than in a standard Cournot model. It is also shown that room exists for perfect and stable collusive agreements amongst firms. Other interesting findings are also twofold. Firstly, that the equilibrium executives' pay will usually be dependant upon the number of companies initially disposing of the technology and/or of the organizational knowledge required to set up the business. Secondly, that companies' procedures difficult to duplicate can constitute a beneficial form of competition policy in that they induce the firms to behave less collusively in the product market.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Managers Compensation and Collusive Behaviour under Cournot Oligopoly|
|Keywords:||Managers' Compensation, Oligopoly, Collusion, Outside Option|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J62 - Job, Occupational, and Intergenerational Mobility
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials
L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L20 - General
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J00 - General
M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M51 - Firm Employment Decisions ; Promotions
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J30 - General
|Depositing User:||Marco A. Marini|
|Date Deposited:||28. Jun 2011 12:01|
|Last Modified:||25. Aug 2015 06:52|
Corchon, L. (1996), The Theory of Imperfect Competitive Markets, Springer Verlag.
Dubey P., Mas-Colell A. and Shubik M. (1980), "Efficiency properties of strategic market games: an axiomatic approach", Journal of Economic Theory, 22, 2, pp.339-362.
Fershtman , C. and Judd, K. (1987), "Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly", American Economic Review, 77, pp.927-940.
Feinstein, J.S. and Stein J. (1988), "Employee Opportunism and Redundancy in Firms", Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 10, 4.
Friedman, J.W. (1977), Oligopoly and the Theory of Games, Amsterdam, North Holland.
Gregg, P., Machin, S. and Szymanski, S. (1993), The Disappearing Relationship Between Director's Pay and Corporate Performance", British Journal of Industrial Relations, forthcoming.
Jensen, M., and Murphy, K. (1990), "Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives", Journal of Political Economy, 98, pp.225-264.
Mailath G. and Postlewaite A. (1990), "Bargaining over the Firm Value", Review of Economics Studies, 57, pp.367-390.
Marini, M. (1997), "Earnings, Coalitions and the Stability of the Firm", mimeo, London School of Economics.
Murphy, K. (1985), "Corporate Performance and Managerial remuneration, An Empirical Analysis", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, pp.11-42.
Sklivas, S. (1987), "The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives", Rand Journal of Economics, 4, pp.473-486.
Smith, R. and Szymanski, S. (1995), "Executive Pay and Performance: The Empirical Importance of the Partecipation Constraint", International Journal of Economics of Business, 2, 3, pp. 485-499.
Stole, Lars A. and Zwiebel, Jeffrey (1997), "Intra-firm Bargaining under Non-binding Contracts", Review of Economic Studies, 3, pp. 375-410.
Vickers, J. (1985), "Delegation and the Theory of the Firm", Economic Journal, 95, pp.138-147.
Watson, R., Storey, D.J., Wynarczyk, P., Keasey, K. and Short, H. (1994), "The Remuneration of Non-owner Managers in Small and Medium-sized UK Enterprises", Journal of Management Studies, 31, pp.553-569