Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues (2011): Spatial autocorrelation and Verdoorn law in the Portuguese nuts III.
Download (1MB) | Preview
This study analyses, through cross-section estimation methods, the influence of spatial effects in productivity (product per worker), at economic sectors level of the NUTs III of mainland Portugal, from 1995 to 1999 and from 2000 to 2005 (taking in count the data availability and the Portuguese and European context), considering the Verdoorn relationship. From the analyses of the data, by using Moran I statistics, it is stated that productivity is subject to a positive spatial autocorrelation (productivity of each of the regions develops in a similar manner to each of the neighbouring regions), above all in services. The total sectors of all regional economy present, also, indicators of being subject to positive autocorrelation in productivity. Bearing in mind the results of estimations, it can been that the effects of spatial spillovers, spatial lags (measuring spatial autocorrelation through the spatially lagged dependent variable) and spatial error (measuring spatial autocorrelation through the spatially lagged error terms), influence the Verdoorn relationship when it is applied to the economic sectors of Portuguese regions. The results obtained for the two periods are different, as expected, and are better in second period, because, essentially, the European and national public supports.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Spatial autocorrelation and Verdoorn law in the Portuguese nuts III|
|English Title:||Spatial autocorrelation and Verdoorn law in the Portuguese nuts III|
|Keywords:||Spatial Econometrics, Economic Growth, Productivity Analysis, Regional Development|
|Subjects:||R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General
|Depositing User:||Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho|
|Date Deposited:||12. Jul 2011 22:21|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2013 10:59|
Abreu, M.; Groot, H.L.F.; and Florax, R.J.G.M. (2004). Spatial Patterns of Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis using TFP. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, 04-079/3, Tinbergen Institute.
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Anselin, L. (2002). Under the Hood: Issues in the Specification and Interpretation of Spatial Regression Models. Agricultural Economics, 17, 3, pp: 247–267.
Anselin, L. (2003a). Spatial Externalities. International Regional Science Review, 26, 2, pp: 147–152.
Anselin, L. (2003b). Spatial Externalities. International Regional Science Review, 26, 2, pp: 147–152.
Anselin, L. (2007). Spatial econometrics in RSUE: Retrospect and prospect. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 4, pp: 450-456.
Anselin, L.; Bera A.K.; Florax, R.; and Yoon, M.J. (1996). Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, pp: 77-104.
Anselin, L.; Bongiovanni, R.; and Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (2004). A Spatial Econometric Approach to the Economics of Site-Specific Nitrogen Management in Corn Production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 3, pp: 675–687.
Anselin, L. and Moreno, R. (2003). Properties of tests for spatial error components. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 5, pp: 595-618.
Anselin, L.; Syabri, I.; and Kho, Y. (2006). GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Geographical Analysis, 38, 1, pp: 5–22.
Baltagi, B.H.; Song, S.H.; and Koh, W. (2003). Testing panel data regression models with spatial error correlation. Journal of Econometrics, 117, pp: 123-150.
Bernat, Jr., G.A. (1996). Does manufacturing matter ? A spatial econometric view of Kaldor’s laws. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 36, 3, pp. 463-477.
Chen, S.; Florax, R.J.G.M.; Snyder, S.; and Miller, C.C. (2010). Obesity and Access to Chain Grocers. Economic Geography, 86, 4, pp: 431-452.
Costantini, M. and Arbia, G. (2006). Testing the stochastic convergence of Italian regions using panel data. Applied Economics Letters, 13, 12, pp: 775-783.
Elhorst, P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5, pp. 9-28.
Fingleton, B. (1999). Economic geography with spatial econometrics: a “third way” to analyse economic development and “equilibrium” with application to the EU regions. EUI Working Paper ECO nº 99/21.
Fingleton, B. (2001). Equilibrium and Economic Growth: Spatial Econometric Models and Simulations. Journal of Regional Science, 41, 1, pp: 117-147.
Fingleton, B. (2007). A multi-equation spatial econometric model, with application to EU manufacturing productivity growth. Journal of Geographical Systems, 9, 2, pp: 119-144.
Fingleton, B. and McCombie, J.S.L. (1998). Increasing returns and economic growth: some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions. Oxford Economic Papers, 50, pp. 89-105.
Florax, R.J.G.M.; Folmer, H.; and Rey, S.J. (2006). A comment on specification searches in spatial econometrics: The relevance of Hendry's methodology: A reply. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36, 2, pp: 300-308.
Kim, C.W; Phipps, T.; and Anselin, L. (2003). Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvement: A Spatial Hedonic Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 1, pp: 24–39.
Longhi, S.; Nijkamp, P.; and Poot, J. (2006). Spatial Heterogeneity And The Wage Curve Revisited. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 4, pp: 707-731.
Lundberg, J. (2006). Using spatial econometrics to analyse local growth in Sweden. Regional Studies, 40, 3, pp: 303-316.
Paelinck, J.H.P. (2000). On aggregation in spatial econometric modelling. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2, pp: 157-165.
Ramajo, J.; Márquez, M.A.; Hewings, G.J.D.; and Salinas, M.M. (2008). Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: Do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions?. European Economic Review, 52, pp: 551–567.