Incentive pay and gender gaps in the Nordic countries

Westling, Tatu (2011): Incentive pay and gender gaps in the Nordic countries.

Abstract

This paper explores the effect of incentive pay on gender pay gaps in Finland, Norway and Sweden among professionals and managers within MNCs. Mercer 2009 Total Remuneration Survey data is utilised. Uniform job ladder, occupation, industry and wage definitions enable consistent cross-country comparisons. In addition to the between-country variation, the within-country variation of gender gap with respect to incentive pay is analysed. The results indicate that gender pay gaps differ among the Nordics and that occupation and industry controls have dissimilar effects across countries. Irrespective of wage element, Finland and Norway are characterised by higher gender gaps than Sweden. Incentives tend to accentuate gender pay gaps. In intention to alleviate the absence of job performance data, this study utilises a rudimentary, promotion-based measure for job performance. In Finland it does affect the gender gap. However, irrespective of gender, high-performers are penalised in Sweden but not in Finland or Norway. The Finnish data also allows the identification of low-performers. Low job performance is rewarded in Finland. Nonetheless, the job performance findings should be interpreted with cautions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Wage differential; incentive pay; job ladder; gender; job performance
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J70 - General

References

W. Arulampalam, et al. (2007). `Is There a Glass Ceiling over Europe? Exploring the Gender Pay Gap across the Wage Distribution'. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 60(2).

R. Asplund, et al. (2008). `More than meets the eye - Gender differences in hierarchical positions and in earnings. Lessons from the Finnish metal industry'.

G. Baker, et al. (1994). `The Wage Policy of a Firm'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(4).

M. L. Blackburn & D. Neumark (1993). `Omitted-ability bias and the increase in the return to schooling'. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(3).

F. D. Blau & L. M. Kahn (2000). `Gender differences in pay'. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4).

A. James, et al. (2003). `Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?'. Journal of Labor Economics 21(1).

L. Kahn (2010). `Labor market policy: a comparative view on the costs and benefits of labor market flexibility'. IZA Discussion Paper (5100).

O. Korkeamäki & T. Kyyrä (2006). `A gender wage gap decomposition for matched employer-employee data'. Labour Economics 13(5).

E. P. Lazear & S. Rosen (1990). `Male-female wage differentials in job ladders'. Journal of Labor Economics, 8(1).

T. Lemieux, et al. (2009). `Performance pay and wage inequality'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124.

H. Melkas & R. Anker (1997). `Occupational segregation by sex in Nordic countries: An empirical investigation'. International Labor Review 136(3).

E. M. Milgrom, et al. (2001). `Equal Pay for Equal Work? Evidence from Sweden and a comparison with Norway and U.S.'. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 103(4).

J. Mincer (1970). `The distribution of labor incomes: a survey with special reference to the human capital approach'. Journal of Economic Literature 8(1).

T. Pekkarinen & C. Riddell (2006). `Gender differences in promotion on a job ladder: evidence from Finnish metalworkers'. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 59(2).

T. Pekkarinen & C. Riddell (2008). `Performance pay and earnings: evidence from personnel records'. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 61(3).

T. Petersen, et al. (1997). `Within-Job Wage Discrimination and the Gender Wage Gap: The Case of Norway'. European Sociological Review 13(2).

S. Rica, et al. (2010). `Performance pay and the gender wage gap: evidence from Spain'. IZA Discussion Paper (5032).

M. Rosholm & N. Smith (1996). `The Danish gender wage gap in the 1980s: a panel data study'. Oxford Economic Papers 48(2).