Tansel, Aysit and Kan, Elif Oznur (2011): Labor mobility across the formal/informal divide in Turkey: evidence from individual level data.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_35672.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Informality has long been a salient phenomenon in developing country labor markets, thus has been addressed in several theoretical and empirical research. Turkey, given its economic and demographic dynamics, provides rich evidence for a growing, heterogeneous and multifaceted informal labor market. However, the existing evidence on labor informality in Turkey is mixed and scant. Along these lines, we aim to extend the existing literature by providing a diagnosis of dynamic worker flows across distinct labor market states and identifying the effects of certain individual and job characteristics on variant mobility patterns. More specifically, we first develop and discuss a set of probability statistics based on annual worker transitions across distinct employment states utilizing Markov transition processes. As Bosch and Maloney (2007:3) argue: “labor status mobility can be assumed as a process in which changes in the states occur randomly through time, and probabilities of moves between particular states are governed by Markov transition matrices”. Towards this end, we will use the novel Income and Living Conditions Survey (SILC) panel data set to compute the transition probabilities of individuals moving across the labor market states of formal-salaried, informal-salaried, formal self-employed, informal self-employed, unemployed and inactive. The transitions analysis is conducted separately for two, three and four year panels pertaining to 2006 to 2007, 2006 to 2008 and 2006 to 2009 transitions; for total, male and female samples; and lastly for total and non-agricultural samples. In this way, we aim to contribute to the limited body of stylized facts available on mobility and informality in the Turkish labor market. Next, we conduct multinomial logit regressions individually for each set of panel to identify the impact of individual characteristics (i.e. gender, age, education level, work experience, sector of economic activity, firm size, number of other household members, having/not having children, rural/urban) underlying worker transitions. The results reveal several relationships between the covariates and likelihood of variant transitions, and are of remarkable importance for designing policy to adress labor informality and reduce its negative externalities.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Labor mobility across the formal/informal divide in Turkey: evidence from individual level data |
English Title: | Labor Mobility across the Formal/Informal Divide in Turkey: Evidence from Individual Level Data |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Labor market dynamics, informality, Markov processes, multinomial logit, Turkey |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J63 - Turnover ; Vacancies ; Layoffs J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J40 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity |
Item ID: | 35672 |
Depositing User: | Elif Oznur Acar |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jan 2012 04:53 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 04:37 |
References: | Aydin, E., M. Hisarciklilar and I. Ilkkaracan (2010), “Formal versus Informal Labor Market Segmentation in Turkey in the Course of Market Liberalization”, Topics in Middle Eastern and North African Economies, 12,1-43. Bernabè, S. (2002), “Informal Employment in Countries in Transition: A Conceptual Framework”, LSE Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) Paper No.56, London. Bernabè, S. and M. Stampini (2009), “Labour Mobility During Transition: Evidence From Georgia”, Economics of Transition, 17(2), 377-409. Bosch, M. and W. Maloney (2005), “Labor Market Dynamics in Developing Countries: Comparative Analysis Using Continuous Time Markov Processes”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3583. Bosch, M. and W. Maloney (2007), “Gross Worker Flows in the Presence of Informal Labour Markets. Evidence from Mexico, 1987-2002”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2864. Bosch, M. and W. Maloney (2010), “Comparative Analysis of Labor Market Dynamics Using Markov Processes: An Application to Informality”, Labour Economics, 17(4), 621-631. Bigsten, A., T. Mengistae and A. Shimeles (2007), “Mobility and Earnings in Ethiopia’s Urban Labor Markets: 1994–2004”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4168. Bukowski, M. and P. Lewandowski (2005), “Transitions From Unemployment in Poland: A Multinomial Logit Analysis”, Labor and Demography 0511008, EconWPA. Bulutay, T. and E. Tasti (2004), “Informal Sector in the Turkish Labour Market”, Turkish Economic Association Discussion Paper, No. 2004/22. Calderon-Madrid, A. (2000), “Job Stability and Labor Mobility in Urban Mexico: A Study Based on Duration Models and Transition Analysis”, Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. R-419. Canavire-Bacarreza, G. J. and L. F. Soria (2007), “Unemployment Duration and Labor Mobility in Argentina: A Socioeconomic-Based Pre- and Post-Crisis Analysis”, CEDLAS Working Papers No. 0054. Chen, M. A. (2007), “Rethinking the Informal Economy: Linkages with the Formal Economy and the Formal Regulatory Environment”, Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs DESA Working paper No. 46, United Nations. Cook, S., Q. Deng, M. Wang and N. Yuan (2010), “Towards Gender Equality in China’s Economic and Social Transformation: The Rise in Informal Employment and its Impact on Women During China’s Economic Transition”, Social Protection In Asia Newsletter No. 6. Duryea, S., G. Marquez, C. Pages and S. Scarpetta (2006), “For Better or For Worse? Job and Earnings Mobility in Nine Middle and Low Income Countries”, Brookings Trade Forum, 187- 203. Ehrenberg, R. G. and R. S. Smith (1996), Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc. Fabrizi, E. and C. Mussida (2009), “The Determinants of Labour Market Transitions”, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 68(2), 233-265. Fields, G.S. (1975), “Rural-Urban Migration, Urban Unemployment and Underemployment, and Job Search Activity in LDC’s”, Journal of Development Economics, 2, 165-187. Funkhouser, E. (1996), “The Urban Informal Sector in Central America: Household Survey Evidence”, World Development, 24(11), 1737-1751. Funkhouser, E. (1997), “Mobility and Labor Market Segmentation: The Urban Labor Market in El Salvador”‚ Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(1), 123–153. Galli, R. and D. Kucera (2004), “Labor Standards and Informal Employment in Latin America”, World Development, 32(5), 809-828. Galli, R. and D. Kucera (2003), “Informal Employment in Latin America: Movements Over Business Cycles and the Effects of Worker Rights”, ILO International Institute for Labour Studies Working Paper No. 145/2003. Gong, X., A. Van Soest and E. Villagomez (2004), “Mobility in the Urban Labor Market: A Panel Data Analysis for Mexico”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53(1), 1-36. Gourieroux, C. (1989), Econometrie des Variables Qualitatives, 2nd edition, Paris: Economica. (English version, 2000: Econometrics of Qualitative Dependent Variables, Cambridge Un. Press). Greene, W.H. (2002), Econometric Analysis, 5th edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Huitfeldt, H. (1998), “Unemployment and Labour Market Transitions in the Czech Republic: Evidence from Micro-data”, Uppsala University Dept. of Economics Working Paper Series No. 5. Hussmanns, R. (2005), “Measuring the Informal Economy: From Employment in the Informal Sector to Informal Employment”, ILO Policy Integration Department Working Paper No. 53. ILO (1993), “Resolution Concerning Statistics of Employment in the Informal Sector”, Resolution II adopted by the Fifteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians, Jan. 1993, Geneva. ILO (2010), Women in Labour Markets: Measuring Progress and Identifying Challenges, International Labor Office, Geneva. Kan, E. O. (2011), “Essays on Informality in the Turkish Labor Market”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Kenar, N. (2009), “Informality: Regulations, Institutions and Enforcement”, Background paper prepared for the Turkey CEM on Informality. Krstić, G. and P. Sanfey (2007), “Mobility, Poverty and Well-being Among the Informally Employed in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Economic Systems, 31(3), 311–335. Lehmann, H. and N. Pignatti (2007), “Informal Employment Relationships and Labor Market Segmentation in Transition Economies: Evidence from Ukraine”, IZA Discussion Papers No. 3269. Maloney, W. (1998), “Are Labor Markets in Developing Countries Dualistic?”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 1941. Maloney, W. (1999), “Does Informality Imply Segmentation in Urban Labor Markets? Evidence from Sectoral Transitions in Mexico”, World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 275-302. Maloney, W. (2004), “Informality Revisited”, World Development, 32(7), 1159-78. Marcoullier, D., V. Ruiz de Casilla and C. Woodruff (1997), “Formal Measures of the Informal-Sector Wage Gap in Mexico, El Salvador, and Peru”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(2), 367-92. Mazumdar, D. (1976), “The Urban Informal Sector”, World Development, 4(8), 655-679. Mohan, R. (1986). Work, wages, and welfare in a developing metropolis: consequences of growth in Bogota, Columbia, New York: Oxford University Press. Pages, C. and M. Stampini (2009), “No Education, No Good Jobs? Evidence on the Relationship Between Education and Labor Market Segmentation”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(3), 387-401. Ozdemir, A. M., D. Erel and G. Yücesan-Özdemir (2004), “Rethinking Informal Labour Market in Turkey: A Possible Politics for Unions”, South East Europe Review, 7(3), 33-42. Perry, G., W. Maloney, O. Arias, P. Fajnzylber, A. Mason and J. Saavedra (2007), Informality: Exit and Exclusion, World Bank Latin America and Caribbean Studies, Washington, DC.: The World Bank. Tansel, A. (1998), “Wage Earners, Self-Employment and Gender in the Informal Sector in Turkey”, Background paper prepared for Engendering Development, Washington, DC.: The World Bank. Tansel, A. (2000) “Formal and Informal Sector Choice of Wage Earners and Their Wages in Turkey’, in Bulutay, T. (ed.) Informal Sector I, Ankara: State Institute of Statistics. Telles, E. (1993), “Urban Labor Market Segmentation and Income in Brazil”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 41(2), 231-249. TURKSTAT (2011), 2009 Income and Living Conditions Survey, Ankara. TURKSTAT (2011), 2008 Income and Living Conditions Survey, Ankara. TURKSTAT (2011), 2006 and 2007 Income and Living Conditions Survey, Ankara. Woltermann, S. (2002), “Job-Search Methods and Labor Market Transitions in a Segmented Economy: Some Empirical Evidence from Brazil”, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 88, University of Göttingen. World Bank (2010), “Turkey Country Economic Memorandum (CEM) on Informality: Causes, Consequences, Policies”, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region, Report No. 48523-TR, The World Bank. Yu, D. (2010), “Defining and Measuring Informal Employment in South Africa: A Review of Recent Approaches”, Working Papers 09/2010, Stellenbosch University, Dept. of Economics. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/35672 |