An Unexpected Role of Local Selectivity in Social Promotion

Garcia-Martinez, Jose A. (2012): An Unexpected Role of Local Selectivity in Social Promotion.

Abstract

A selection process and a hierarchical promotion system in a dynamic model are considered as in Harrington (1998) and Garcia-Martinez (2010), where agents are "climbing the pyramid" in a rank-order contest based on the "up or out" policy. The population at any level of the hierarchy is matched in groups of n agents, and each group faces a particular environment. Agents are ranked according to the quality of their performances in each particular environment. The top k performing agents from each group are promoted. The fraction (k/n) characterizes the local selectivity of the process. The role of the degree of local selectivity in the dynamic process where agents' types differ in their expected performances is studied. For low selectivity, the selection process is not strong enough to overcome the inertia of the initial population. If selectivity increases, only the best-performing type of agent will survive. If the selectivity is increased far enough, the worst-performing type also survives, and the proportion for which they account at equilibrium increases as selectivity increases. Therefore, surprisingly, no matter how low the expected success rate of a type is, if the selection process has a high enough level of selectivity, agents of that type survive in the long run: Too much selectivity is always harmful to the best-performing type.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social hierarchy; Selection; Selectivity; Promotion
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D00 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games ; Evolutionary Games ; Repeated Games

References

ALÓS-FERRER, C. (1999), "Dynamical Systems with a Continuum of Randomly Matched Agents" Journal of Economic Theory, 86 , 245-267.

ELAYDI, S. (1996), "An introduction to difference equations" Springer-Verlag, New York.

FAIRBUN, J. A. and MALCOMSON, J. M. (2001), "Performance, Promotion, and the Peter Principle", Review of Economic Studies, 68, 45--66.

GARCIA-MARTINEZ, J. A. (2010), "Selectivity in Hierarchical Social Systems", Journal of Economic Theory, 145, 2471-2482.

HARRINGTON, J. E. (1998), "The Social Selection of Flexible and Rigid Agents", American Economic Review, 88, 63-82.

HARRINGTON, J. E. (1999a), "Rigidity of Social Systems" Journal of Political Economy, 107 , 40-64.

HARRINGTON, J. E. (1999b), "The Equilibrium Level of Rigidity in a Hierarchy", Games and Economic Behavior, 28, 189--202.

HARRINGTON, J. E. (2000), "Progressive Ambition, Electoral Selection, and the Creation of Ideologies" Economics of Governance, Vol. 1, Issue 1.

HARRINGTON, J. E. (2003), "Rigidity and Flexibility in Social Systems: Transitional Dynamics", Computational Models in Political Economy, K. Kollman, J. Miller, and S. Page, eds. The MIT Press.

HVIDE,H. K. and KRISTIANSEN, E. G (2002), "Risk taking in selection contests", Games and Economic Behavior, 42, 172-179

LAZEAR, E., ROSEN, S. (1981), "Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts". Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841--864.

ROSEN, S. (1986), "Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments", American Economic Review, 76, 701--715.

VEGA-REDONDO, F. (2000), "Unfolding Social Hierarchies", Journal of Economic Theory, 90 , 177-203