Non-Robust Dynamic Inferences from Macroeconometric Models: Bifurcation Stratification of Confidence Regions

Barnett, William A. and Duzhak, Evgeniya (2006): Non-Robust Dynamic Inferences from Macroeconometric Models: Bifurcation Stratification of Confidence Regions.

Abstract

Grandmont (1985) found that the parameter space of the most classical dynamic models are stratified into an infinite number of subsets supporting an infinite number of different kinds of dynamics, from monotonic stability at one extreme to chaos at the other extreme, and with all forms of multiperiodic dynamics between. The econometric implications of Grandmont’s findings are particularly important, if bifurcation boundaries cross the confidence regions surrounding parameter estimates in policy-relevant models. Stratification of a confidence region into bifurcated subsets seriously damages robustness of dynamical inferences. But Grandmont provided his result with a model in which all policies are Ricardian equivalent, no frictions exist, employment is always full, competition is perfect, and all solutions are Pareto optimal. Hence he was not able to reach conclusions about the policy relevance of his dramatic discovery. As a result, Barnett and He (1999, 2001, 2002) investigated a Keynesian structural model, and found results supporting Grandmont’s conclusions within the parameter space of the Bergstrom-Wymer continuous-time dynamic macroeconometric model of the UK economy. That highly regarded, prototypical Keynesian model was produced from a system of second order differential equations. The model contains frictions through adjustment lags, displays reasonable dynamics fitting the UK economy’s data, and is clearly policy relevant. Criticism of Keynesian structural models by the Lucas critique have motivated development of Euler equations models having policy-invariant deep parameters, which are invariant to policy rule changes. Hence, Barnett and He (2006) chose to continue the investigation of policy-relevant bifurcation by searching the parameter space of the best known of the Euler equations macroeconometric models: the Leeper and Sims (1994) model. The results further confirm Grandmont’s views. Even more recently, interest in policy in some circles has moved to New Keynesian models. As a result, in this paper we explore bifurcation within the class of New Keynesian models. We develop the econometric theory needed to locate bifurcation boundaries in log-linearized New-Keynesian models with Taylor policy rules or inflation-targeting policy rules. Empirical implementation will be the subject of a future paper, in which we shall solve numerically for the location and properties of the bifurcation boundaries and their dependency upon policy-rule parameter settings. Central results needed in this research are our theorems on the existence and location of Hopf bifurcation boundaries in each of the cases that we consider. We provide the proofs of those propositions in this paper. One surprising result from these proofs is the finding that a common setting of a parameter in the future-looking New-Keynesian model can put the model directly onto a Hopf bifurcation boundary. Beginning with Grandmont’s findings with a classical model, we continue to follow the path from the Bergstrom-Wymer policy-relevant Keynesian model, then to the Euler equation macroeconomic models, and now to the New Keynesian models. So far, all of our results suggest that Barnett and He’s initial findings with the policy-relevant Bergstrom-Wymer model appear to be generic.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Bifurcation; inference; dynamic general equilibrium; Pareto optimality; Hopf bifurcation; Euler equations; New Keynesian macroeconometrics; Bergstrom-Wymer model
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E37 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables

References

Aiyagari, S. R. (1989). Can there be short-period deterministic cycles when people are long lived?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 163-185.

Andronov, A. A. (1929). Les Cycles Limits de Poincaré et la Théorie des Oscillations Autoentretenues. Comptes-rendus de l’Academie des Sciences 189, 559-561.

Barnett, William A. and Yijun He (1999). Stability Analysis of Continuous-Time Macroeconometric Systems. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 3, 169-188.

Barnett, William A. and Yijun He (2001). Nonlinearity, Chaos, and Bifurcation: A Competition and an Experiment. In Takashi Negishi, Rama Ramachandran, and Kazuo Mino (Eds.), Economic Theory, Dynamics and Markets: Essays in Honor of Ryuzo Sato (pp. 167-187). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Barnett, William A. and Yijun He (2002). Stabilization Policy as Bifurcation Selection: Would Stabilization Policy Work if the Economy Really Were Unstable?. Macroeconomic Dynamics 6, 713-747.

Barnett, William A. and Yijun He (2004). Bifurcations in Macroeconomic Models. In Steve Dowrick, Rohan Pitchford, and Steven Turnovsky (Eds), Economic Growth and Macroeconomic Dynamics: Recent Developments in Economic Theory (pp. 95-112). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Barnett, William A. and Yijun He (2006). Robustness of Inferences to Singularity Bifurcation. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings of the 2005 American Statistical Society 100. American Statistical Association, February.

Benhabib, J., Day, R. H. (1982). A Characterization of Erratic Dynamics in the Overlapping Generations Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 4, 37-55.

Benhabib J., Nishimura K. (1979). The Hopf Bifurcation and the Existence and Stability of Closed Orbits in Multisector Models of Optimal Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Theory 21, 421-444.

Benhabib, J., Rustichini, A. (1991). Vintage Capital, Investment and Growth. Journal of Economic Theory 55, 323-339.

Bergstrom, A. R. (1996). Survey of Continuous Time Econometrics. In W. A. Barnett, G. Gandolfo, and C. Hillinger (Eds.). Dynamic Disequilibrium Modeling (pp, 3-26). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bergstrom, A. R., K. B. Nowmann, and S. Wandasiewicz (1994). Monetary and Fiscal Policy in a Second-order Continuous Time Macroeconometric Model of the United Kingdom. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18, 731-761.

Bergstrom, A. R., K. B. Nowman, and C. R. Wymer (1992). Gaussian Estimation of a Second Order Continuous Time Macroeconometric Model of the United Kingdom. Economic Modelling 9, 313-352.

Bergstrom, A.R., and C.R. Wymer (1976). A Model of Disequilibrium Neoclassic Growth and its Application to the United Kingdom. In A.R. Bergstrom (Ed.), Statistical Inference in Continuous Time Economic Models. Amsterdam: North Holland, 267-327.

Bergstrom, A. R. and K. B. Nowman (2006). A Continuous Time Econometric Model of the United Kingdom with Stochastic Trends. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.

Bernanke, Ben S., Thomas Laubach, Frederic S. Mishkin, and Adam S. Posen (1999). Inflation Targeting: Lessons from the International Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Calvo, G. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework, Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 383-398.

Clarida, Richard, Jordi Galí, and Mark Gertler (1999). The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1661–1707.

Dixit, Avinash and Joseph E. Stiglitz (1977). Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. American Economic Review 67, 297-308.

Gali, J., and M. Gertler (1999). Inflation Dynamics: a Structural Econometric Analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 44, 195-222.

Gale, D. (1973). Pure Exchange Equilibrium of Dynamic Economic Models. Journal of Economic Theory 6, 12-36.

Gandolfo, Giancarlo 1996. Economic Dynamics. Third edition. New York and Heidelburg: Springer.

Gavin, William T (2003), Inflation Targeting: Why It Works and How To Make It Work Better, Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis Working Paper 2003-027B.

Grandmont, J. M. (1985). On Endogenous Competitive Business Cycles. Econometrica 53, 995-1045.

Hopf, E. (1942). Abzweigung Einer Periodischen Lösung von Einer Stationaren Lösung Eines Differetialsystems. Sachsische Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematische-Physikalische, Leipzig 94, 1-22.

Kuznetsov,Yu.A (1998). Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. New York: Springer - Verlag.

Leeper, E. and C. Sims (1994). Toward a Modern Macro Model Usable for Policy Analysis. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 81-117.

McCallum, B.T. (1999). Issues in the design of monetary policy rules. In J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford (Eds.). Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.

Poincaré, H. (1892). Les Methodes Nouvelles de la Mechanique Celeste. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

Roberts, J. M. (1995). “New Keynesian Economics and the Phillips Curve.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27. 975-984.

Seydel, R. (1994). Practical bifurcation and stability analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Shapiro, A. H. (2006). Estimating the New Keynesian Phillips Curve: A Vertical Production Chain Approach. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper No. 06-11.

Svensson, Lars E. O. (1999). Inflation Targeting as a Monetary Policy Rule. Journal of Monetary Economics 43, 607-54.

Taylor, John B. (1999). A Historical Analysis of Monetary Policy Rules. In John B. Taylor (Ed.), Monetary Policy Rules (pp. 319-40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER.

Walsh, Carl E. (2003). Monetary Theory and Policy. 2nd edition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Woodford, Michael (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.