Palma, Nuno (2013): Did Greenspan Open Pandora's Box? Testing the Taylor Hypothesis and Beyond.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_48197.pdf Download (208kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Taylor hypothesis is the conjecture that the 2007-2009 financial crisis and the 2008-present downturn have been caused by loose monetary policy during 2002-2006. According to the Taylor hypothesis the Fed deviated from well-know rules of monetary policy-making over this period, and this deviation caused an inefficient boom and subsequent bust. I use a well know economic model of the US aggregate economy (Christiano, Eichenbaum and Evans 2005) to test this hypothesis. I interpret shocks as deviations from Taylor-type rules. I conclude that the Taylor hypothesis for the Taylor rule fails to reproduce observed fluctuations in the data. Output increases only 0.3% at maximum which occurs at 2004:Q2. In the data, the output gap was at it's maximum in 2006:Q3. However, the Taylor hypothesis modified to incorporate persistence in the policy rule can partly explain the boom of the economy after 2001.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Did Greenspan Open Pandora's Box? Testing the Taylor Hypothesis and Beyond |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Business Cycle, Financial Crisis, Great Moderation, Monetary Shocks, Persistence |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E37 - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E65 - Studies of Particular Policy Episodes |
Item ID: | 48197 |
Depositing User: | Nuno Palma |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2013 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 02:07 |
References: | Bernanke, B. (2009). The Crisis and the Policy Response. Stamp Lecture, LSE. Avaliable at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke2009Christiano, L. (2002). Solving Dynamic Equilibrium Models by a Method of Undetermined Coefficients. Computational Economics, 20 (October): 21-55. Christiano, L., M. Eichenbaum and C. Evans (2005). Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy. Journal of Political Economy, 113:1. Clarida, R., J. Galí, M. Gertler (1999). The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No. 4: 1661-1707. Gertler and Kardi (2011). A Model of Unconventional Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics. 58(1): 17--34 Ravn, S. (2012). Has the Fed Reacted Asymmetrically to Stock Prices? B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, vol. 12:1 (Topics), article 14. Taylor, J. (2007). Housing and Monetary Policy: Proceedings of Jackson Hole Symposium. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Taylor, J. (2009b). Getting Off Track: How Government Actions and Interventions Caused, Prolonged, and Worsened the Financial Crisis. Hoover Institution Press Publication. Yun, T. (1996). Nominal Price Rigidity, Money Supply Endogeneity, and Business Cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(2): 345-370. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/48197 |