Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2013): Redemption and Depression.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_50924.pdf Download (502kB) | Preview |
Abstract
According to prevailing methodological criteria, standard economics is definitively refuted. Joan Robinson’s wake-up call “Scrap the lot and start again” has therefore lost nothing of its original freshness and urgency. Yet, how can the restart succeed? This inquiry builds on structural axioms. First, conceptual consistency is assured and the confusion about profit and income is dissolved. The question of interest is then how a recession or depression develops as the result of the normal functioning of the monetary economy. This involves the identification of positive feedback. A very effective mechanism consists of the circular interaction of profit and distributed profit.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Redemption and Depression |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; randomness; market clearing; budget balancing; consumption economy; investment economy; credit expansion |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General |
Item ID: | 50924 |
Depositing User: | Egmont Kakarot-Handtke |
Date Deposited: | 24 Oct 2013 16:30 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 11:44 |
References: | Ackerman, F., and Nadal, A. (Eds.) (2004). Still Dead After All These Years: Interpreting the Failure of General Equilibrium Theory. London, New York, NY: Routledge. Arrow, K. J. (1988). Workshop on the Economy as an Evolving Complex System: Summary. In P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow, and D. Pines (Eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, pages 275–281. Redwood City, CA, Menlo Park, CA, etc.: Addison-Wesley. Arrow, K. J., and Hahn, F. H. (1991). General Competive Analysis. Amsterdam, New York, NY, etc.: North-Holland. Benetti, C., and Cartelier, J. (1997). Economics as an Exact Science: the Persistence of a Badly Shared Conviction. In A. d’Autume, and J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?, pages 204–219. Cheltenham, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar. Born, M. (1949). Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Clower, R. W., and Bushaw, D. W. (1954). Price Determination in a Stock-Flow Economy. Econometrica, 22(3): 328–343. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1907357. Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. Desai, M. (2008). Profit and Profit Theory. In S. N. Durlauf, and L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, pages 1–11. Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition. URL http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000213. Hausman, D. M. (1992). The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011a). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (I). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1895268: 1–26. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1895268. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011b). Squaring the Investment Cycle. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1911796: 1–25. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1911796. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2012). Primary and Secondary Markets. Levy Economics Institute Working Papers, 741: 1–27. URL http://www.levyinstitute.org/publications/?docid=1654. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013a). Confused Confusers: How to Stop Thinking Like an Economist and Start Thinking Like a Scientist. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2207598: 1–16. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=2207598. Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2013b). Why Post Keynesianism is Not Yet a Science. Economic Analysis and Policy, 43(1): 97–106. URL http://www.eap-journal.com/archive/v43_i1_06-Kakarot-Handtke.pdf. Keen, S. (2010). Solving the Paradox of Monetary Profits. Economics E-Journal, 4(2010-31). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-31. Koo, R. C. (2009). The Holy Grail of Macroeconomics. Lessons from Japan’s Great Recession. Singapore: Wiley. Kreuzenkamp, H. A., and McAleer, M. (1995). Simplicity, Scientific Inference and Econometric Modeling. Economic Journal, 105: 1–21. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2235317. Mirowski, P. (1989). The Rise and Fall of the Concept of Equilibrium in Economic Analysis. Louvain Economic Review, 55(4): 447–468. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/40723905. Parry, C. E. (1921). A Revaluation of Traditional Economic Theory. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 11(1): 123–131. URL http://www. jstor.org/stable/1807500. Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Fixation of Belief. In N. Houser, and C. Kloesel (Eds.), The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings., volume 1, pages 109–123. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (1877). Russel, B. (1961). The Basic Writings of Betrand Russel, chapter Limitations of Scientific Method, pages 620–627. London: Routledge. Stigum, B. P. (1991). Toward a Formal Science of Economics: The Axiomatic Method in Economics and Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Tómasson, G., and Bezemer, D. J. (2010). What is the Source of Profit and Interest? A Classical Conundrum Reconsidered. MPRA Paper, 20557: 1–34. URL http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20557/. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/50924 |