Zúniga González, Carlos Alberto (2010): Impacto de los Sistemas de Producción Agropecuarios en el Desarrollo Local Sostenible de Nicaragua, 1998-2005: Índice de Malmquist DEA con un producto Orientado. Published in: Universitas (León) , Vol. 1, No. 4 (10 November 2013): pp. 10-17.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_52079.pdf Download (247kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study shows, as it contributes to local sustainable development (LSD) of agricultural production systems in Nicaragua during the periods 1998-2001 to 2005. The articles is organized in the first section with a literature review on the methodology of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis), the systems approach and the theory of local sustainable development, the second section discusses the type of data used, the third section explains the methodology used, the fourth section is dedicated to the results and the last section presents the conclusions. The study used the methodology of DEA, with the Malmquist index to calculate the change in total factor productivity (TFP) during the period studied, this index is built into the econometric model design sustainable local development (MDLS) to measure the contribution to the LSD. The research results show that the forestry subsystem and backyard production shows an increasing trend in the rate of TFP. The variables used in the model explained less than 50 % contribution to the DLS , given its level of significance and level of contribution. These variables are the social and productive and subsystems that outlook forestry and backyard production.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Impacto de los Sistemas de Producción Agropecuarios en el Desarrollo Local Sostenible de Nicaragua, 1998-2005: Índice de Malmquist DEA con un producto Orientado. |
English Title: | Livestock Production Systems Impact on the Nicaragua Sustainable Local Development, 1998-2005: Malmquist DEA Index with an oriented Output |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Malmquist Index, Production System, Local Sustainable Development |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P25 - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P36 - Consumer Economics ; Health ; Education and Training ; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R38 - Government Policy R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 52079 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Dr. C. A. Zuniga-Gonzalez |
Date Deposited: | 11 Dec 2013 12:39 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 04:50 |
References: | 1.-Bravo-Ureta, B.E., and R. Evenson (1994). “Efficiency in Agricultural Production: The Case of Peasant Farmers in Eastern Paraguay. ” Agricultural Economics 10 (1994):27-37. 2.-Bravo-Ureta, B., and L. Rleger (1991). “Dairy Farm Efficiency Measurement Using Stochastic Frontiers and Neoclassical Duality. ” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):421-28. 3.-Bravo-Ureta, B., and L. Rieger (1990). “Alternative Production Frontier Methodologies and Dairy Farm Efficiency. ” Journal of Agricultural Economics 41(1990):215–26. 4.-Bravo-Ureta, B. E., and Pinheiro, António., E (1993) Efficiency Analysis of Developing Country Agriculture: A Review of the Frontier Function Literature. 5.-Coelli, T.J. (1994), A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program, The University of New England, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) Working Papers. No 8/96. Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. 6.-Coelli, T.J., (1996). A guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) working paper, department of Econometrics. University of New England Armidale NSW 2351 Australia.http:www.une.edu.au/ econometrics/cepawp .htm ISSN 1327-435X, ISBN 1 86389 4969. 7.-Carletto, Gero., et al., (2010). Improving the Availability, Quality and Policy-Relevance of Agricultural Data: TheLiving Standards Measurement Study–Integrated Surveys on Agriculture. Development Research Group The World Bank and The LSMS Team. Washington, DC 24-25 May 2010. 8.-INIDE, (2001). Informe Comparativo encuesta nacional de hogares sobre medición de nivel de vida 1993 y 1998. Proyecto MECOVI, Octubre 2001. 9.-INIDE, (1998). Informe general Encuesta Nacional de Hogares sobre medición de nivel de vida. Proyecto MECOVI, mayo 2000. 10.-INIDE, (2001). Informe general Encuesta Nacional de Hogares sobre medición de nivel de vida. Proyecto MECOVI, mayo 2002. 11.-INIDE, (2006). Informe general Encuesta Nacional de Hogares sobre medición de nivel de vida. Proyecto MECOVI, mayo 2006. 12.-INIDE, (2005). Análisis de la encuesta nacional de hogares sobre medición del nivel de vida 2005 con perspectiva de género. Julio 2005. 13.-INIDE, (2007). Informe general encuestas de Hogares sobre Medición del Nivel de Vida 2005. Proyecto-MECOVI-EMNV. www.inide.gob.ni. Mayo 2007. 14.- Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang (1994), ¨Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialized Countries, American Economic Review, 84,66-83. 15.-Grosskopf, S. (1993), ¨ Efficiency and Productivity ¨, Fried, H.O, C.A.K Lovell and SS Schmidt (Eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Oxford University Press, New York, 160-194. 16.-Gómez Sal, Antonio. (2009). Veinte años desde Brundtland. Razones para una ciencia de la sostenibilidad. Ambienta 28-45,Septiembre 2009. 17.-González Esquinas, Ma José. García Palomares, Juan Carlos (1998). Fuentes documentales sobre Desarrollo Local. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense 1998, No 18: 337- 353. ISSN: 0211-9803. 18.-Ministerio Agropecuario y Forestal, (MAGFOR), 2009. 19.-Spedding, C. R. W (1979) An Introduction to Agricultural Systems. Chapter 1, The Purposes of Agriculture. Applied Science Publishers, England. pp. 1–14. 20.-Spedding, (1995). An Introduction to Agricultural System. Charter 1, The purposes of agricultural. Applied Science Publishers Englands. Pp. 1-14 21.-Spedding, (1995). Sustainability in animals production system. Anm Sci 61,,1-8. 22.-United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), et al., (2007). The Wye Group Handbook. Rural Households, Livelihood and Well-Being. Statistics on Rural Development and Agricultural Household Income. United Nations New York and Geneva, 2007. 23.-World Bank (2006), LSMS IV: Research for Improving Survey Data. LSMS team Poverty Group, DECRG. January 2006. 24.-Zúniga, G., Carlos A., (2011). Comparisons of LSMS-ISA data collection and dissemination efforts in Central America. Journal of development and Agricultural Economics. August 2011, Vol. 3 (8), pp 353-361. 25.-Zúniga, G. Carlos A., (2010). Nuevo Modelo de Participación Ciudadana: Identificación de Sistemas de Producción agropecuarios y Forestales en los Departamentos de León y Chinandega, 2008- 2009. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/52079 |