Payment Scheme Changes and Effort Provision: The Effect of Digit Ratio

Neyse, Levent and Friedl, Andreas and Schmidt, Ulrich (2014): Payment Scheme Changes and Effort Provision: The Effect of Digit Ratio.

Abstract

Economic experiments report that individuals perform better under a piece rate payment scheme in comparison to a fixed payment scheme. The reason is straightforward: incentives motivate people, and without incentives they decrease their effort. Yet women are prone to choose a fixed payment over a piece rate payment scheme. We aim to find out if this gender effect is related to prenatal exposure to testosterone, which by nature is sexually dimorphic and has permanent effects on human brain development with an impact on cognitive and physical skills, as well as behavior. We investigate the effect of prenatal testosterone exposure on performance adjustment in a real effort task. Each subject is salaried under either a fixed rate or piece rate payment scheme for five periods and subsequently encounters the alternative payment method for another five periods. To observe the prenatal testosterone levels that the participants were exposed to during pregnancy, we use the so-called digit ratio as an indirect measurement method. It uses the length-ratio between the participants’ index and ring fingers to infer about their in utero testosterone exposure. Our results confirm the previous findings indicating that individuals perform better when incentivized by a piece rate payment scheme. Subjects who are paid piece rate in the first half of the experiment immediately decrease their performance at the beginning of the second half when paid under a fixed payment scheme. In contrast, subjects increase their effort if the payment method is switched from fixed rate to piece rate in the second half of the experiment. Subjects who were exposed to higher levels of prenatal testosterone provide significantly lower effort when the payment scheme is switched from piece rate to fixed rate.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Digit Ratio; 2D:4D; Real Effort Task; Payment Schemes; Incentives
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D87 - Neuroeconomics; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages ; Payment Methods

References

Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., Little, A. C., & Campbell, B. C. (2011). Androgens and competitiveness in men. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(1), 54.

Austin, E. J., Manning, J. T., McInroy, K., & Mathews, E. (2002). A preliminary investigation of the associations between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Personality and individual differences, 33(7), 1115-1124.

Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261-292.

Bennett, M., Manning, J. T., Cook, C. J., & Kilduff, L. P. (2010). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and performance in elite rugby players. Journal of sports sciences, 28(13), 1415-1421.

Bosch Domènech, A., Brañas P., & Espín A. M. (2013). Fetal Testosterone (2D: 4D) as Predictor of Cognitive Reflection (No. 698).

Brañas-Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. PloS one, 6(12), e29842.

Brañas-Garza, P., Kovářík, J., & Neyse, L. (2013). Second-to-fourth digit ratio has a non-monotonic impact on altruism. PloS one, 8(4), e60419.

Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the menstrual cycle and social preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(2), 457-470.

Charness, G., & Kuhn, P. (2011). Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab?. Handbook of labor economics, 4, 229-330.

Coates, J. M., Gurnell, M., & Rustichini, A. (2009). Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(2), 623-628.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 448-474.

Dohmen, T., & Falk, A. (2011). Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. The American Economic Review, 101(2), 556-590.

Falk, A., & Fehr, E. (2003). Why labour market experiments?. Labour Economics, 10(4), 399-406.

Fink, B., Neave, N., Laughton, K., & Manning, J. T. (2006). Second to fourth digit ratio and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(7), 1253-1262.

Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?. American psychologist, 51(11), 1153.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental economics, 10(2), 171-178.

Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Sydnor, J. (2011). Digit ratios (2D: 4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 1-26.

Gill, D., & Prowse, V. L. (2011). A novel computerized real effort task based on sliders (No. 5801). Discussion paper series//Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.

Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049-1074.

Goy R, McEwen B (1980) Sexual Differentiation of the Brain. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Hampson, E., Ellis, C. L., & Tenk, C. M. (2008). On the relation between 2D: 4D and sex-dimorphic personality traits. Archives of sexual behavior, 37(1), 133-144.

Hopp, R. N., de Moraes, J. P., & Jorge, J. (2012). Digit ratio and academic performance in dentistry students. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 643-646.

Hönekopp, J., & Watson, S. (2010). Meta‐analysis of digit ratio 2D: 4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. American Journal of Human Biology,22(5), 619-630.

Hönekopp, J., T Manning, J., & Müller, C. (2006). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior, 49(4), 545-549

Jenkins Jr, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 777.

Kohn, A. (1993). Why incentive plans cannot work?. Harvard Business Review, 54.

Laffont, J. J., & Martimort, D. (2009). The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton University Press.

Lazear, E. P. (1986). Salaries and piece rates. Journal of business, 405-431.

Lazear, E. P. (1996). Performance pay and productivity (No. w5672). National bureau of economic research.

Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational behavior and human performance, 3(2), 157-189.

Lucas, M., & Koff, E. (2010). Delay discounting is associated with the 2D: 4D ratio in women but not men. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 182-186.

Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., & Punćcohaŕ, J. (1994). Highly confident but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. Journal of educational psychology, 86(1), 114.

Luxen, M. F., & Buunk, B. P. (2005). Second-to-fourth digit ratio related to verbal and numerical intelligence and the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 959-966.

Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Lewis-Jones, D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human reproduction, 13(11), 3000-3004.

Manning, J. T., & Taylor, R. P. (2001). Second to fourth digit ratio and male ability in sport: implications for sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(1), 61-69.

Manning, J. T., Bundred, P. E., Newton, D. J., & Flanagan, B. F. (2003). The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene.Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(6), 399-405.

Manning, J. T., Stewart, A., Bundred, P. E., & Trivers, R. L. (2004). Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children. Early Human Development, 80(2), 161-168.

Millet K, Dewitte S (2008)A subordinate status position increases the present value of financial resources for low 2D:4D men. Am J Hum Biol 20:110–115.

Millet, K. (2009). Low second-to-fourth-digit ratio might predict success among high-frequency financial traders because of a higher need for achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(11), E30.

Moore, D. A., & Small, D. A. (2007). Error and bias in comparative judgment: on being both better and worse than we think we are. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(6), 972.

Neyse, L., & Brañas-Garza, P. (2014). Digit ratio measurement guide (No. 1914). Kiel Working Paper.

Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067-1101.

Nye, J. V., Androuschak, G., Desierto, D., Jones, G., & Yudkevich, M. (2012). 2D: 4D asymmetry and gender differences in academic performance. PloS one, 7(10), e46319.

Paarsch, H. J., & Shearer, B. (2000). Piece rates, fixed wages, and incentive effects: Statistical evidence from payroll records. International Economic Review, 41(1), 59-92.

Paul, S. N., Kato, B. S., Hunkin, J. L., Vivekanandan, S., & Spector, T. D. (2006). The big finger: the second to fourth digit ratio is a predictor of sporting ability in women. British journal of sports medicine, 40(12), 981-983.

Pearson, M., & Schipper, B. C. (2012). The Visible Hand: Finger ratio (2D: 4D) and competitive bidding. Experimental Economics, 15(3), 510-529.

Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D: 4D) studies. Archives of sexual behavior, 37(1), 100-111.

Romano, M., Leoni, B., & Saino, N. (2006). Examination marks of male university students positively correlate with finger length ratios (2D: 4D). Biological Psychology, 71(2), 175-182.

Sanchez-Pages, S., & Turiegano, E. (2010). Testosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners' dilemma. Physiology & behavior, 99(3), 355-361.

Schipper, B. (2012). Sex hormones and choice under risk (No. 12, 7). Working Papers, University of California, Department of Economics.

Shearer, B. (2004). Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. The Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 513-534.

Slumming VA, Manning JT (2000) Second to fourth digit ratio in elite musicians: evidence for musical ability as an honest signal of male fitness. Evolution and Human behavior 21: 1–9.

Stenstrom, E., Saad, G., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Mendenhall, Z. (2011). Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D: 4D and< i> rel</i> 2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 412-416.

Voracek, M., Tran, U. S., & Dressler, S. G. (2010). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and sensation seeking: New data and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 72-77.

Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.