The Impossibility of Democratic Socialism: Two Conceptions of Democracy

Makovi, Michael (2016): The Impossibility of Democratic Socialism: Two Conceptions of Democracy.

Abstract

Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny (1994) have used Public Choice analysis to criticize market socialism. Peter J. Boettke (1995) and Peter T. Leeson and Boettke (2002) have argued that F. A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom (2007 [1944]) constituted a form of Public Choice analysis as well, in particular presaging an application of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem to democratic socialism. This essay demonstrates that additionally, Hayek's book adumbrated the distinction between liberal or limited democracy and illiberal or totalitarian democracy. This distinction between two conceptions of democracy provides another means of criticizing democratic socialism. The democratic political system and socialist economic system are fundamentally incompatible, making democratic socialism impossible, in the sense that democracy cannot fulfill for socialism what democratic socialists expect from it. Democratic socialism will fail, not because those in power will betray their trust or abuse their power, but because the fundamental institutional constraints of democracy are incompatible with socialist economics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Hayek; Road to Serfdom; democratic socialism; market socialism; economic democracy; totalitarianism; public choice; government failure; liberal democracy; illiberal democracy; arrow; impossibility; rent seeking; rent-seeking
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B24 - Socialist ; Marxist ; Sraffian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B25 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary ; Austrian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B53 - Austrian; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P10 - General; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P20 - General; P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P30 - General; P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P50 - General

References

Adamson, Walter L. “Review: Convergences in Recent Democratic Theory.” Theory and Society 18:1 (Jan.): 125-142.

Archer, Robin. (1995). Economic Democracy: The Politics of Feasible Socialism. NY: Oxford University Press.

Boettke, Peter J. (2012). Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Oakland, CA: Independent Institute / Guatemala City: Universidad Francisco Marroquín.

Boettke, Peter J. (1998). “Economic Calculation: The Austrian Contribution to Political Economy.” Advances in Austrian Economics vol. 5: 131-158.

Boettke, Peter J. (1995). “Hayek's The Road to Serfdom Revisited: Government Failure in the Argument Against Socialism.” Eastern Economic Journal 21:1 (Winter): 7-26. Rpt. in Boettke, Calculation and Coordination, London/NY: Routledge: 47-65.

Boettke, Peter J. and Peter T. Leeson. (2002). “Hayek, Arrow, and the Problems of Democratic Decision-Making.” Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice (PFPC) 20:1.

Brennan, Jason. (2014). Why Not Capitalism? NY/London: Routledge.

Brutzkus, Boris. (1935). Economic Planning in Soviet Russia. Ed. F. A. Hayek. London: Routledge.

Burczak, Theodore. (2006). Socialism after Hayek, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Burczak, Theodore. (2009). “Hayekian Socialism, Post Critics.” Review of Social Economy 67:3 (Sept.): 389-394.

Burczak, Theodore. (2011). “A Socialist Spontaneous Order.” In Andrew Farrant (ed.), Hayek, Mill, and the Liberal Tradition. NY: Routledge: 130-147.

Callari, Antonio. (2009). “A Methodological Reflection on the 'Thick Socialism' of 'Socialism after Hayek.'” Review of Social Economy 67:3 (Sept.): 367-373.

Caplan, Bryan. (n.d. #1). “The Anarcho-Statists of Spain: An Historical, Economic, and Philosophical Analysis of Spanish Anarchism.” Unpublished. <http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/spain.htm> [accessed: 13 March 2016].

Caplan, Bryan. (n.d. #2). “Anarchist Theory FAQ Version 5.2.” Unpublished. <http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/anarfaq.htm> [accessed: 13 March 2016].

Caplan, Bryan. (2011). The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Caplan, Bryan and Edward Stringham. (2005). “Mises, Bastiat, Public opinion, and Public Choice.” Review of Political Economy 17(1): 79-105.

Corwin, Edward S. (1955). The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. (Rpt. from Harvard Law Review 42 (1928-1929): 149-185, 365-409.)

Coser, Lewis. (1978). Untitled reply to Heilbroner (1978a). Dissent 25:3 (Summer): 349-351. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

van Creveld, Martin. (1999). The Rise and Decline of the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Crothers, Lane. (1994). “George Orwell and the Failure of Democratic Socialism: The Problem of Political Power.” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 77:3/4 (Fall/Winter): 389-407.

Dahl, Robert A. (1985). A Preface to Economic Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press

Denitch, Bogdan. (1978). Untitled reply to Heilbroner (1978a). Dissent 25:3 (Summer): 351-355. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

Dissent, editors of. (2015). “What Is Democratic Socialism?” 14 Nov. <https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/what-is-democratic-socialism> [accessed: 16 Feb. 2016]

Farrant, Andrew and Edward McPhail. (2009). “Hayek, Samuelson, and the logic of the mixed economy?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 69(1): 5-16.

Green, David. (1986). Untitled review of Dahl (1985). Sociology 20:2 (May): 290-292.

Green, David. (1993). Reinventing Civil Society: The Rediscovery of Welfare Without Politics. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

Hague, Rod and Martin Harrop. (2007). Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. 7th edition. Basingstroke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.

Harrington, Michael. (1978a). “What Socialists Would Do in America – If They Could.” Dissent 25:4 (Fall): 440-452. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

Harrington, Michael. (1978b). Untitled reply to Heilbroner (1978a). Dissent 25:3 (Summer): 355-357. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015). Hayek, F. A. (2007 [1944]). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Hayek, F. A. (2002). “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” Trans. Marcellus S. Snow. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 5(3): 9-23.

Hayek, F. A. (1984a [1976]). “Whither Democracy?”. Lecture of 8 Oct. 1976, rpt. in The Essence of Hayek. Eds. Chiaki Nishiyama and Kurt R. Leube. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press: 352-362.

Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and the Economic Order. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

Hayek, F. A. (ed.) (1935). Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge.

Heilbroner, Robert L. (1978a). “What is Socialism?” Dissent 25:3 (Summer): 341-348. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

Heilbroner, Robert L. (1978b). Untitled reply to criticisms of Heilbroner (1978a). Dissent 25:3 (Summer): 359-360.

Heilbroner, Robert L. (1989). “Reflections: The Triumph of Capitalism.” New Yorker (Jan. 23rd): 98-109.

Heilbroner, Robert L. (2008). “Socialism.” The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Library of Economics and Liberty. <http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Socialism.html> [accessed 21 Feb. 2016]

Hinich, Melvin J. and Michael C. Munger. (1997). Analytical Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Hoff, Trygve J. B. (1981). Economic Calculation in the Socialist Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Orig. London / Edinburgh / Glasgow: William Hodge, 1949. Trans. M. A. Michael from the orig. Økonomisk Kalkulasjon i Socialistiske Samfund. Oslo: H. Aschehoug, 1938.)

Howe, Irving (ed.). (1982). Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four: Texts, Sources, Criticism. 2nd. ed. New York: Harcourt.

Howe, Irving and Lewis Coser. (1954). “Images of Socialism.” Dissent 1 (Spring): 122-38. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

Ikeda, Sanford. (2016). “'Democratic Socialism' Is a Contradiction in Terms: What Happens When You Try to Combine Democracy with Socialism?.” The Freeman. March 17th. <http://fee.org/articles/democratic-socialism-is-a-contradiction-in-terms/> [accessed: 24 March 2016].

Jewkes, John. (1968 [1948]). The New Ordeal By Planning: The Experience of the Forties and Sixties. London/Melbourne/Toronto: Macmillan & New York: St. Martin's. (Updated from The Ordeal by Planning. New York: Macmillan, 1948.)

Lange, Oskar. (1938). On the Economic Theory of Socialism. B. Lippincott (ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

Lawson, Robert A. and Jeff R. Clark. (2010). “Examining the Hayek–Friedman hypothesis on economic and political freedom.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 74(3): 230-239.

Lavoie, Don. (1985a.) National Economic Planning: What is Left?. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

Lavoie, Don. (1985b). Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge / London / NY / New Rochelle / Melbourne / Sydney: Cambridge University Press.

Leoni, Bruno. (2009 [1965]). “The Problem of Economic Calculation in a Planned Economy,” in Carlo Lottieri (ed.), Law, Liberty and the Competitive Market. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 39-82. (Orig. “Il problema del calcolo economico in un'economica di piano.” Il Politico 30(3) (1965): 415-460.)

Makovi, Michael. (2015). “George Orwell as a Public Choice Economist.” The American Economist 60(2): 183-208.

Makovi, Michael. (2016a). “Two Opposing Literary Critiques of Socialism: George Orwell Versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt.” Forthcoming in the International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE).

Makovi, Michael. (2016b). “Labor Economics in a Planned Economy: F. A. Hayek and John Jewkes on the Impossibility of Democratic Socialism.” Unpublished working paper. <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70174> [accessed: 20 March 2016].

Makovi, Michael. (2016c). “Interest Groups and the Impossibility of Democratic Socialism: Hayek, Jewkes, and the Arrow Theorem.” Unpublished working paper. <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70173> [accessed: 20 March 2016].

Mayer, Robert. (2001). "Robert Dahl and the Right to Workplace Democracy." The Review of Politics 63:2 (Spring): 221-247.

Mises, Ludwig von. (1981 [1922]). Socialism. Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Classics. Rpt. from previous editions of London: Jonathan Cape (1936), Yale University Press (1951), and London: Jonathan Cape (1969). All English editions translated by J. Kahane from the orig. De Gemeinwirtschaft (1922).

Mises, Ludwig von. (1974 [1950]). “Middle-of-the-Road Policy Leads to Socialism.” In Mises, Planning for Freedom (South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press): 18-35.

Newsinger, John. (1999). Orwell's Politics. Houndsmills, Basingstroke, New Hampshire and New York: Palgrave.

Novak, Michael. (1986). Will it Liberate? Questions about Liberation Theology. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

Nozick, Robert. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

Orwell, George. (1935). “Catastrophic Gradualism.” Pp. 923-937 in Orwell 2002. (Orig. C. W. Review, November 1935.)

Orwell, George. (1939). “Review of Russia under Soviet Rule by N. de Basily.” Pp. 108-111 in Orwell 2002. (Orig. New English Weekly, 12 Jan. 1939.)

Orwell, George. (1941a). “The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius.” Pp. 291-348 in Orwell 2002. (Orig. 19 Feb. 1941.)

Orwell, George. (1941b). “Will Freedom Die with Capitalism?” The Left News. April 1941: 1682-1685. (Rpt. in The Complete Works of George Orwell, edited by Peter Davison. London: Secker & Warburg, 1998: 458-464)

Orwell, George. (1944). “Letter to Noel Willmett.” Pp. 232-233 in George Orwell: A Life in Letters, edited by Peter Davison. New York / London: Liveright, 2013 (rpt. from 2010). (Orig. 18 May 1944. Rpt. in Howe 1982: 279-281.)

Orwell, George. (1946). “Why I Write.” Pp. 1079-1085 in Orwell 2002. (Orig. Gangrel, no. 4, summer 1946. Rpt. in Howe 1982: 243-248.)

Orwell, George. (2002). Essays, edited by John Carey. Everyman's Library. New York: Knopf. (Based on Complete Works, Vols. 10-20, publ. 2000-2002 by Secker and Warburg.)

Percy, Lord of Newcastle. (1955). The Heresy of Democracy: A Study in the History of Government. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.

Phillips, Anne. (1997). “Sexual Equality and Socialism.” Dissent 44 (Summer): 28-38. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

Roback, Jennifer. (1985). “The Economic Thought of George Orwell.” The American Economic Review 75:2 (May): 127-32.

Röpke (Roepke), Wilhelm. (1998 [1957]). A Humane Economy. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Books.

Sanandaji, Nima. (2011). “The Swedish Model Reassessed: Affluence Despite the Welfare State.” Helsinki, Finland: Libera Foundation. <http://www.libera.fi/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Libera_The-Swedish-model.pdf> [accessed: 2 Feb. 2015]

Schweickart, David. (1992). “Economic democracy: A worthy socialism that would really work.” Science & Society 56(1): 9-38.

Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. (1994).“The Politics of Market Socialism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:2 (Spring): 165-176.

de Soto, Jesús Huerta. (2010). Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Steele, David Ramsay. (1992). From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. La Salle: Open Court.

Stein, Peter. (1991). “Sweden: From Capitalist Success to Welfare-State Sclerosis.” Cato Institute Policy Analysis no. 160. <http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/sweden-capitalist-success-welfarestate-sclerosis> [accessed: 25 Feb. 2015]

Talmon, Jacob. (1960). The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. NY: Praeger.

Tupy, Marian. (2016). “Bernie Is Not a Socialist and America Is Not Capitalist: Scandinavia is, by one measure, a freer market than the United States.” The Atlantic. <http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/03/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism/471630/> [accessed: 21 March 2016]

Walzer, Michael. Untitled reply to Heilbroner (1978a). Dissent 25:3 (Summer): 357-359. Hyperlinked in Dissent (2015).

Walzer, Michael. (2010). “Which Socialism?” Dissent 57:3 (Summer): 37-43. Hyperlinked at Dissent (2015).

White, Richard. (2008). “George Orwell: Socialism and Utopia.” Utopian Studies 19(1): 73-95.

Wilson, Woodrow. (1918). “Fourteen Points.” <http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/wilson14.asp> [accessed: 21 March 2015].

Yergin, Daniel and Joseph Stanislaw. (2002). The Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy. New York: Free Press. (Updated edition from the original by same publisher, 1998, with the previous subtitle of “The Battle Between Government and the Marketplace That Is Remaking the Modern World.”)