Makovi, Michael (2016): The Freedom of the Prices: Hayek's Road to Serfdom Reassessed.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_72071.pdf Download (405kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recent debate has centered around the contemporary relevance and even the original validity of F. A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom. Was it directed against command socialism only or against welfare-state interventionism as well? Should the book even be read anymore? This essay takes a step back from the dichotomy between socialism and interventionism and explores two specific ideas of Hayek's which deserve renewed attention: first, his claim that economic liberty is the fundamental liberty and that political liberty is merely secondary in value. Second, Hayek's conception of the rule-of-law, which has implications for contemporary command-and-control regulation. Furthermore, that Hayek's philosophical conception of the rule-of-law in the Road to Serfdom is related to his economic theory of prices in “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” While Hayek's specific target in the Road to Serfdom was command socialism, his book embodied arguments which are more widely applicable and relevant today.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Freedom of the Prices: Hayek's Road to Serfdom Reassessed |
English Title: | The Freedom of the Prices: Hayek's Road to Serfdom Reassessed |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | rule of law; liberty; freedom; rights; price system |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B24 - Socialist ; Marxist ; Sraffian B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B25 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary ; Austrian B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B53 - Austrian D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design K - Law and Economics > K0 - General > K00 - General P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P10 - General P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P20 - General P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P50 - General |
Item ID: | 72071 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Michael Makovi |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jun 2016 04:38 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 19:29 |
References: | Aranson, Peter H. (1988). “Bruno Leoni in Retrospect.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 11: 661-711 Bernstein, David E. (2012). “David Bernstein's Reply,” in, “A CRB discussion of Lochner v. New York.” Claremont Review of Books. <http://www.claremont.org/crb/basicpage/a-crb-discussion-of-lochner-v-new-york/> [accessed: 9 June 2016]. Bernstein, David E. (2011). Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights against Progressive Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Block, Walter E. “Hayek’s Road to Serfdom.” Journal of Libertarian Studies 12(2):339-365. Boaz, David. (2005). “The Man Who Told the Truth: Robert Heilbroner fessed up to the failure of socialism.” Reason. 21 Sept. <http://reason.com/archives/2005/01/21/the-man-who-told-the-truth> [accessed:17 Feb. 2016] Boaz, David. (2016). “What Socialism Requires.” Huffington Post. 22 Sept. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-boaz/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism_b_9055290.html> [accessed:17 Feb. 2016] Boettke, Peter J. (1995). “Hayek's The Road to Serfdom Revisited: Government Failure in the Argument Against Socialism.” Eastern Economic Journal 21:1 (Winter):7-26. Rpt. in Boettke, Calculation and Coordination, London/NY: Routledge:47-65. Boettke, Peter J. and Nicholas A. Snow. (2012). “The Servants of Obama's Machinery: F.A. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom Revisited?—A Reply.” Eastern Economic Journal 38(4):428-433. Brennan, Jason. (2014). Why Not Capitalism?. NY / London: Routledge. Caldwell, Bruce. (2011). “Hayek on Socialism and on the Welfare State: A Comment on Farrant and McPhail's 'Does F.A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom Deserve to Make a Comeback?'.”Challenge 54(1):82-97. Caldwell, Bruce. (2007). “Introduction” to Hayek (2007 [1944]):1–33. Caldwell, Bruce. (1997). “Hayek and Socialism.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(4):1856-1890. Capaldi, Nicholas and Gordon Lloyd. (2011). The Two Narratives of Political Economy. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Salem, Massachusetts: Scrivener. Corwin, Edward S. (1955). The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press. (Rpt. from Harvard Law Review 42 (1928-1929): 149-185, 365-409.) Durbin, E. F. M. (1945). “Professor Hayek on Economic Planning and Political Liberty.” Economic Journal 55(220):357-370. Ebeling, Richard. (1977). “An Interview with Friedrich Hayek.” Libertarian Review. September: 10-16. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail. (2012). “Supporters are Wrong: Hayek Did Not Favor a Welfare state.” Challenge 55(5):94-105. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail. (2011a). “A Response to Caldwell on F.A. Hayek and The Road to Serfdom.” Challenge 54(1):98-112. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail (2011b). “A Substitute End for Socialism? F.A. Hayek and Keynesian Full-Employment Policy.” The Historical Journal 54(4):1115-1123. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail. (2011c). “Hayek, Keynesian economics, and Planning Against Competition: A Caveat?.” History of Economics Review 53 (2011):1-9. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail. (2010a). “Does F.A. Hayek's Road to Serfdom Deserve to Make a Comeback?.” Challenge 53(4):96-120. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail. (2010b). “Hayek’s New Popularity: The False Claims That He Was Right.” Challenge 53(5):78-91. Farrant, Andrew, and Edward McPhail. (2009). “Hayek, Samuelson, and the Logic of the Mixed Economy?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 69(1):5-16. Friedman, Milton. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. Godard, François. (2013). “The Road to Serfdom's Economistic Worldview.” Critical Review 25(3-4): 364-385. Hague, Rod and Martin Harrop. (2007). Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. 7th edition. Basingstroke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan. Hazlitt, Henry. (1966 [1951]). Time Will Run Back. New Rochelle: Arlington. (Orig. The Great Idea. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1951.) Hayek, F. A. (2011 [1960]). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F. A. (2007 [1944]). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Hayek, F. A. (1997 [1939]). “Freedom and the Economic System.” In: Caldwell (ed.), Socialism and War. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund: 189-211. Rpt. from Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F. A. (1992 [1977].) “The Road from Serfdom: An Interview with F.A. Hayek.” Reason.com <http://reason.com/archives/1992/07/01/the-road-from-serfdom/> [accessed: 12 May 2016]. Hayek, F. A. (1982). “Two Pages of Fiction: The Impossibility of Socialist Calculation.” Economic Affairs 2(3): 135-142. Rpt. in Nishiyama and Leube (eds.), The Essence of Hayek. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1984, pp. 53-61. Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago / London: Chicago University Press. Hayek, F. A. (1978). New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge. Hayek, F. A. (1976a). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago / London: Chicago University Press. Hayek, F. A. (1976b). “Whither Democracy?.” In: Hayek (1978:152-162). Hayek, F. A. (1976c). “Socialism and Science.” In: Hayek (1978:295-308). Hayek, F. A. (1973a). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order. Chicago / London: Chicago University Press. Hayek, F. A. (1973b). “Economic Freedom and Representative Government.” In: Hayek (1978:105-118). Hayek, F. A. (1973c). “Liberalism.” In: Hayek (1978:119-151). Hayek, F. A. (1967a). Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Hayek, F. A. (1967b). “The Constitution of a Liberal State.” Il Politico 32(3):455-461. Rpt. Hayek (1978:98-104). Hayek, F. A. (1967c.) “The Confusion of Language in Political Thought.” In: Hayek (1978:71-97). Hayek, F. A. (1966). “The Principles of a Liberal Social Order.” In: Hayek (1967a:160-177). Rpt. from Il Politico 31:4 (Dec.):601-618. Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and the Economic Order. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. Hayek, F. A. (1947). “'Free' Enterprise and Competitive Order.” In: Hayek (1948:107-118). Hayek, F. A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35(4):519-530. Rpt. in Hayek (1948:77-91). Hayek, F. A. (1940). “Socialist Calculation: The Competitive 'Solution.'” Economica 7(26):125-149. Rpt. in Hayek (1948:181-208). Hayek, F. A. (1937). “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4(13): 33-54. Rpt. Hayek (1948:33-56). Hayek, F. A. (ed.) (1935). Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge. Heilbroner, Robert L. (1978). “What is Socialism?” Dissent 25:3 (Summer):341-348. Heilbroner, Robert L. (1986). The Nature and Logic of Capitalism. NY & London: W. W. Norton & Company. Hoff, Trygve J. B. (1981). Economic Calculation in the Socialist Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. (Rpt. from London / Edinburgh / Glasgow: William Hodge, 1949. Trans. M. A. Michael from the orig. Økonomisk Kalkulasjon i Socialistiske Samfund. Oslo: H. Aschehoug, 1938.) Huerta de Soto, Jesús. (2010). Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Hutt, William T. (1975 [1954]). “The Significance of Price Flexibility.” In: Svetozar Pejovich and David Klingaman (eds.), Individual Freedom: Selected Works of William H. Hutt. Westport, CT / London: Greenwood:130-146. Rpt. from Southern African Journal of Economics 22(1):40-51. Iacono, Corey. (2016). “The Myth of Scandinavian Socialism.” The Freeman. <https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-of-scandinavian-socialism/> [accessed: 9 June 2016]. Ikeda, Sanford. (2015). “Dynamics of Interventionism.” in: Peter J. Boettke and Christopher J. Coyne, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics. Oxford / NY: Oxford University Press:393-416. Jackson, Ben. (2010). “At the Origins of Neo-Liberalism: The Free Economy and the Strong State, 1930–1947.” Historical Journal 53(1):129-151. Kern, Fritz. (1956 [1914]). Kingship and Law in the Middle Ages. Trans. S. B. Chrimes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Kolev, Stefan (2010). “F. A. Hayek as an Ordo-liberal.” HWWI Research Paper, No. 5-11. <http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48214> [accessed: 7 June 2016]. Lavoie, Don. (1985a.) National Economic Planning: What is Left?. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Lavoie, Don. (1985b). Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge / London / NY / New Rochelle / Melbourne / Sydney: Cambridge University Press. Lawson, Robert A. and Jeff R. Clark. (2010). “Examining the Hayek–Friedman Hypothesis on Economic and Political Freedom.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 74(3):230-239. Leoni, Bruno. (2009 [1965]). “The Problem of Economic Calculation in a Planned Economy,” in Carlo Lottieri (ed.), Law, Liberty and the Competitive Market. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 39-82. (Orig. “Il problema del calcolo economico in un'economica di piano.” Il Politico 30(3) (1965):415-460.) Leoni, Bruno. (1991 [1961]). Freedom and the Law. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Orig. William Volker Fund, 1961. Rpt. Fairfax: Institute for Humane Studies, 1972. Liggio, Leonard P., and Tom G. Palmer. (1988) “Freedom and the Law: A Comment on Professor Aranson's Article.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 11: 713-725 Makovi, Michael. (2016a). “Two Opposing Literary Critiques of Socialism: George Orwell Versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt.” Forthcoming in the International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE). Makovi, Michael. (2016b). “Interest Groups and the Impossibility of Democratic Socialism: Hayek, Jewkes, and the Arrow Theorem.” Unpublished working paper. <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/70173> [accessed: 20 March 2016]. McIlwain, Charles Howard. (1947). Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Mises, Ludwig von. (1996 [1929]). A Critique of Interventionism. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education. (Orig. Kritik des Interventionismus. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1929). Mises, Ludwig von. (1998). Interventionism: An Economic Analysis. Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education. (Trans. from unpublished German manuscript written in 1940.) Mises, Ludwig von. (1981 [1922]). Socialism. Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Classics. Rpt. from previous editions of London: Jonathan Cape (1936), Yale University Press (1951), and London: Jonathan Cape (1969). All English editions translated by J. Kahane from the orig. De Gemeinwirtschaft (1922). Mises, Ludwig von. (1974 [1950]). “Middle-of-the-Road Policy Leads to Socialism.” In Mises, Planning for Freedom (South Holland, IL: Libertarian Press):18-35. McPhail, Edward, and Andrew Farrant. (2013). “Hayek and the Sorcerer's Apprentice: Whither the Hayekian Logic of Intervention?.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 72(4):966-982. McPhail, Edward, and Andrew Farrant. (2012). “The Servants of Obama's Machinery: F.A. Hayek's The Road to Serfdom Revisited?.” Eastern Economic Journal 38(4):423-427. Mitchell, Daniel. (2016). “Sweden Isn't a Good Role Model for Bernie Sanders.” Blog. <https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/sweden-isnt-a-good-role-model-for-bernie-sanders/> [accessed: 8 April 2016]. Richter, Eugen. (2010 [1891]). Pictures of the Socialistic Future. Auburn: Mises Institute. (Orig. Sozialdemokratische Zukunftsbilder, 1891. Trans. Henry Wright. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1893.) Röpke (Roepke), Wilhelm. (1998 [1957]). A Humane Economy. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute Books. Röpke (Roepke), Wilhelm. (1992 [1942]). The Social Crisis of Our Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Röpke (Roepke), Wilhelm. (1987 [1951]). 2 Essays by Wilhelm Roepke. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Rothbard, Murray. (1977). “The Myth of Democratic Socialism.” Libertarian Review. September: pp. 24-27, 45. <http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/rothbard.pdf> [accessed:17 March 2016]. Sanandaji, Nima. (2011). The Swedish Model Reassessed: Affluence Despite the Welfare State. Helsinki, Finland: Libera Foundation. <https://web.archive.org/web/20150105192615/http://www.libera.fi/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Libera_The-Swedish-model.pdf> [accessed:2 Feb. 2015] Schweickart, David. (1992). “Economic democracy: A worthy socialism that would really work.” Science & Society 56(1): 9-38. Sumner, Scott. (2015). “ Bernie’s Nordic fantasy.” Money Illusion (blog). <http://www.themoneyillusion.com/?p=31156> [accessed: 9 June 2016]. Steele, David Ramsay. (1992). From Marx to Mises: Post-Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. La Salle: Open Court. Stein, Peter. (1991). “Sweden: From Capitalist Success to Welfare-State Sclerosis.” Cato Institute Policy Analysis no. 160. <http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/sweden-capitalist-success-welfarestate-sclerosis> [accessed:25 Feb. 2015] Tupy, Marian. (2016). “Bernie Is Not a Socialist and America Is Not Capitalist: Scandinavia is, by one measure, a freer market than the United States.” The Atlantic. <http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/03/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialism/471630/> [accessed:21 March 2016] Witt, Ulrich. (1992). “The Endogenous Public Choice Theorist.” Public Choice 73(1):117-129. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72071 |
Available Versions of this Item
- The Freedom of the Prices: Hayek's Road to Serfdom Reassessed. (deposited 18 Jun 2016 04:38) [Currently Displayed]