Munich Personal RePEc Archive

Two Opposing Literary Critiques of Socialism: George Orwell Versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt

Makovi, Michael (2015): Two Opposing Literary Critiques of Socialism: George Orwell Versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt. Published in: International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education , Vol. 2, No. 7 (2016): pp. 116-134.

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
MPRA_paper_73387.pdf

Download (247kB) | Preview

Abstract

Orwell's famous fictions, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four criticized totalitarian forms of socialism from a Public Choice perspective, assuming that socialism would work as an economic system as long as the proper political institutions were in place to curb the potential for the abuse of power. This is contrasted with two novels by others who took the opposite approach: Richter's Pictures of the Socialistic Future and Hazlitt's Time Will Run Back. These two assumed that the political implementation of socialism would be perfect but that socialism would necessarily turn totalitarian because of the problem of economic calculation. These novels assumed away the Public Choice problem of institutions and the abuse of power and focused on the political implications of socialism as a purely economic system. Contrasting these two sets of novels shows how the Austrian and Public Choice schools criticize socialism in two entirely different ways.

Available Versions of this Item

UB_LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.