A topological approach to structural change analysis and an application to long-run labor allocation dynamics

Stijepic, Denis (2016): A topological approach to structural change analysis and an application to long-run labor allocation dynamics.

Abstract

A great part of economic literature deals with structural changes, i.e. long-run changes in the structure of economic aggregates. While the standard literature relies on the mathematical branches of analysis and algebra for modeling structural change and describing the relevant empirical evidence, we choose a topological approach, which relies on the notions of self-intersection and mutual intersection of trajectories. We discuss all the methodological and mathematical aspects of this approach and show that it is applicable to a wide range of classical topics and papers of growth and development theory. Then, we apply it for studying a specific type of structural change, namely, the long-run labor re-allocation across sectors: we (a) elaborate new empirical evidence stating that mutual intersection and non-self-intersection are stylized facts of long-run labor re-allocation, (b) suggest and discuss theoretical explanations of non-self-intersection, and (c) discuss mathematical methods for explaining mutual intersection by using standard structural change models. Overall, our approach generates new evidence, new critique points of the previous structural change literature, new theoretical arguments, and a wide range of new research topics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: structural change; dynamics; long run; trajectory; intersection; self-intersection; differential equations; geometry; topology; labor; allocation; savings; functional income distribution
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C65 - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

References

Acemoglu, D., Guerrieri, V., 2008. Capital deepening and non-balanced economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 116 (3), 467–498.

Antras, P., 2001. Transitional Dynamics of the Savings Rate in the Neoclassical Growth Model. mimeo.

Barro, R.J., Sala-i-Martin, X., 2004. Economic Growth. Second Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Baumol, W.J., 1967. Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review 57 (3), 415–426.

Boppart, T., 2014. Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts in a Growth Model With Relative Price Effects and Non-Gorman Preferences. Econometrica 82(6), 2167–2196.

Caselli, F., Ventura, J., 2000. A Representative Consumer Theory of Distribution. The American Economic Review 90, 909–926.

Cass, D., 1965. Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 32, 233–240.

Foellmi, R., Zweimüller, J., 2008. Structural change, Engel’s consumption cycles and Kaldor’s facts of economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 55 (7), 1317–1328.

Herrendorf, B., Rogerson, R., Valentinyi, Á., 2014. Growth and structural transformation. In: Aghion P. and S.N. Durlauf, eds., “Handbook of Economic Growth”, Volume 2B, Elsevier B.V.

Jackson, Frank, and Smith, Michael, eds., 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York.

Koopmans, T.C., 1967. Intertemporal Distribution and Optimal Aggregate Economic Growth. In: Ten Economic Studies in the Tradition of Irving Fisher. Wiley, New York.

Kongsamut, P., Rebelo, S., Xie, D., 2001. Beyond balanced growth. Review of Economic Studies 68 (4), 869–882.

Krüger, J.J., 2008. Productivity and structural change: a review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (2), 330–363.

Maddison, A., 1995. Monitoring the World Economy 1820–1992. OECD Development Centre.

Maddison, A., 2007. Contours of the World Economy I-2030 AD, Essays in Macro-economic History. Oxford University Press, New York.

Ngai, R.L., Pissarides, C.A., 2007. Structural change in a multisector model of growth. American Economic Review 97 (1), 429–443.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). The Labour Share in G20 Economies. Report prepared of the G20 Employment Working Group, Antalya Turkey, 26-27 February 2015.

Ramsey, F.P., 1928. A Mathematical Theory of Savings. Economic Journal 38, 543–559.

Reutlinger, A., Schurz, G., Hüttemann, A., 2015. Ceteris Paribus Laws. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/ceteris-paribus/

Romer, P.M, 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), 71–102.

Schettkat, R., Yocarini, L., 2006. The shift to services employment: a review of the literature. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 17 (2), 127–147.

Silva, E.G., Teixeira, A.A.C., 2008. Surveying structural change: seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 19 (4), 273–300.

Solow, R.M., 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65–94.

Stijepic, D., 2011. Structural Change and Economic Growth: Analysis within the Partially Balanced Growth-Framework. Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften, Saarbrücken. An older version is available online: http://deposit.fernuni-hagen.de/2763/.

Stijepic, D., 2014. Structural change in neoclassical growth literature. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2401202.

Stijepic, D., 2015a. An Argument Against Cobb-Douglas Production Functions (in Multi-Sector-Growth Modeling). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2610734 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2610734.

Stijepic, D., 2015b. A geometrical approach to structural change modelling. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 33, 71–85.