Has Globalization Triggered Collective Impact of National Intelligence on Economic Growth?

Burhan, Nik Ahmad Sufian and Sidek, Abdul Halim and Kurniawan, Yohan and Mohamad, Mohd Rosli (2014): Has Globalization Triggered Collective Impact of National Intelligence on Economic Growth? Published in: Intelligence , Vol. 48, (January 2015): pp. 152-161.

Abstract

Previous studies found that the impact of intelligence (IQ) on productivity is larger at country level than at individual level. Labor works in clusters at the country level, and therefore, the effect of individual skill complementarities collectively magnifies per capita income at the national level, which is consistent with the O-ring theory of economic development. The main feature of the O-ring theory is positive assortative matching, in which individuals can augment productivity per capita when they team up with other individuals with equivalent levels of skills. We investigated whether global integration would intensify this impact owing to global interconnectivity of skills and intellectual ideas. By extending the O-ring theory, we examined the role of economic globalization (i.e., actual flows and restrictions), social globalization (i.e., personal contact, information flows, and cultural proximity), and political globalization in moderating the impact of national IQ on the economic growth of more than 110 countries during 1970–2010. The results of our hierarchical multiple regressions suggest that IQ rather than economic, political, or social globalization has the strongest impact on economic growth. Moreover, moderation analysis revealed that globalization has reduced the impact of national IQ on economic growth at the cross-country level. We suggest that within the context of globalization, friction was present in the matching market and cognitive skill-sorting inefficiencies, which reduced the collective impact of IQ on economic growth.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: national IQ; collective IQ; economic growth; globalization; positive assortative matching.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making; F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F62 - Macroeconomic Impacts; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence

References

Abowd, J. M., Kramarz, F., & Margolis, D. N. (1999). High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica, 67, 251–333.

Acemoglu, D. (1996). A microfoundation for social increasing returns in human capital accumulation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 779–804.

Acemoglu, D. (1999). Changes in unemployment and wage inequality: An alternative theory and some evidence. American Economic Review, 89, 1259–1278.

Albrecht, J., & Vroman, S. (2002). A matching model with endogenous skill requirements. International Economics Review, 43, 282–305.

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity al large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Arcand, J. L., & Fafchamps, M. (2012). Matching in community-based organizations. Journal of Development Economics, 98, 203–219.

Ariely, G. (2012). Globalisation and the decline of national identity? An exploration across sixty‐three countries. Nations and Nationalism, 18, 461–482.

Aschhoff, B., & Grimpe, C. (2012). Peer effects and academics’ industry involvement: The moderating role of age on professional imprinting. ZEW Discussion Paper 12–011. Mahhheim: Center for European Economic Research

Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In J. V. Henderson, & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (pp. 2713–2739). New York: Elsevier.

Bagues, M., & Perez-Villadoniga, M. J. (2012). Do recruiters prefer applicants with similar skills? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82, 12–20.

Barnett, T. P. M. (2005). The Pentagon's new map: War and peace in the twenty-first century. New York: Penguin.

Barry, B. (2001). Culture and equality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846.

Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bils, M., & Klenow, P. J. (2000). Does schooling cause growth? American Economic Review, 90, 1160–1183.

Bouchard T. J. & McGue M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.

Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2008). Education, globalisation and the knowledge economy: A commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: TLRP Institute of Education.

Brunello, G., De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2010). Peer effects in higher education: Does the field of study matter? Economic Inquiry, 48, 621–634.

Burhan, N. A. S., Mohamad, M. R., Kurniawan, Y., & Sidek, A. H. (2014a). The impact of low, average, and high IQ on economic growth and technological progress: Do all individuals contribute equally?. Intelligence, 46, 1–8.

Burhan, N. A. S., Mohamad, M. R., Kurniawan, Y., & Sidek, A. H. (2014b). National intelligence, basic human needs, and their effect on economic growth. Intelligence, 44, 103–111.

Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24, 29–39.

Carlino, G. A. (2001). Knowledge spillovers: Cities’ role in the new economy. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, Q4, 17–23.

Carrell, S. E., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. R. (2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 439–464.

Cheong, P. H., Edwards, R., Goulbourne, H., & Solomos, J. (2007). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical Social Policy, 27, 24–49.

Coburn, D. (2000). Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: The role of neoliberalism. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 135–146.

Coburn, D. (2004). Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: Class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 41–56.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

Croucher, S. L. (2004). Globalization and belonging: The politics of identity in a changing world. Maryland and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

Damiano, E., Li, H., & Suen, W. (2005). Unravelling of dynamic sorting. Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1057–1076.

Davidson, C., Heyman, F., Matusz, S., Sjöholm, F., & Zhu, S. C. (2012). Liberalized trade and worker-firm matching. American Economic Review, 102, 429–434.

Davidson, C., Heyman, F., Matusz, S., Sjöholm, F., & Zhu, S. C. (2014). Globalization and imperfect labor market sorting. IFN Working Paper No. 856. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.

Davidson, C., Matusz, S. J., & Shevchenko, A. (2008). Globalization and firm level adjustment with imperfect labor markets. Journal of International Economics, 75, 295–309.

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.

Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Empirical evidence from a new index. Applied Economics, 38, 1091–1110.

Dreher, A. (2012). KOF Index of Globalization. ETH Zurich. Available online at: http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/.

Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalization: Gauging its consequences. New York: Springer.

Eraydin, A. (2008). The impact of globalisation on different social groups: Competitiveness, social cohesion and spatial segregation in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 45, 1663–1691.

Escorial, S., & Martín-Buro, C. (2012). The role of personality and intelligence in assortative mating. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 680–687.

Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1996). Comparative advantage, information and the allocation of workers to tasks: Evidence from an agricultural labour market. Review of Economic Studies, 63, 347–374.

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115–134.

Gavrilova, E. (2014). A partner in crime: Assortative matching and bias in the crime market. NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper No. 25/2014. Bergen: Norwegian School of Economics.

Glaeser, E. (1996). Economic growth and urban density: A review essay. In Cities and the new global economy conference proceedings, Vol. 3. (pp. 227–246). Government Printing Office: Melbourne.

Godlonton, S., & Thornton, R. (2012). Peer effects in learning HIV results. Journal of Development Economics, 97, 118–129.

Green, A., Janmaat, G., & Cheng, H. (2011). Social cohesion: Converging and diverging trends. National Institute Economic Review, 215, R6–R22.

Green, A., Preston, J., & Janmaat, G. (2006). Education, equality and social cohesion: A comparative analysis. London: Palgrave.

Greenwood, J., Guner, N., Kocharkov, G., & Santos, C. (2014). Marry your like: Assortative mating and income inequality. American Economic Review,104, 348–353.

Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond “culture”: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 6–23.

Gwartney, J., & Lawson, R. (2003). The concept and measurement of economic freedom. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 405–430.

Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83–116.

Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90, 1184–1208.

Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O., & Redding, S. (2010). Inequality and unemployment in a global economy. Econometrica, 78, 1239–1283.

Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2012). Penn World Table (Version 7.1). Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, November 30, 2012. Available online at https://pwt.sas.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt71/pwt71_form.php.

Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2007). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 1403–1448.

Huber, S., & Fieder, M. (2011). Educational homogamy lowers the odds of reproductive failure. PloS One, 6(7), E22330.

Jones, G. (2011a). National IQ and national productivity. In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics [Online Version]. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jones, G. (2011b). National IQ and national productivity: The hive mind across Asia. Asian Development Review, 28, 51−71.

Jones, G. (2013). The O-Ring sector and the foolproof sector: An explanation for skill-externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 85, 1–10.

Jones, G., & Schneider, W. J. (2006). Intelligence, human capital, and a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 71–93.

Jones, G., & Schneider, W. J. (2010). IQ in the production function: Evidence from immigrant earnings. Economic Inquiry, 48, 743–755.

Kail, R., & Cavanaugh, J. (2013). Human development: A life-span view. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Kling, J., Liebman, J., & Katz, L. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighbourhood effects. Econometrica, 75, 83–119.

Kottak, C. P. (2011). Cultural anthropology: Appreciating cultural diversity (14th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Kremer, M. (1993). The O-Ring theory of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 551–575.

Krueger, A. B., & Lindahl, M. (2001). Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 1101–1136.

Lagerström, K., & Andersson, M. (2003). Creating and sharing knowledge within a transnational team—the development of a global business system. Journal of World Business, 38, 84–95.

Lockwood, D. (1992). Solidarity and schism: The problem of disorder in Durkeimian and Marxist sociology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lockwood, D. (1999). Civic integration and social cohesion. In: I. Gough, & G. Olofsson (Eds.), Capitalism and social cohesion: Essay on exclusion and integration, (pp. 63–84). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.

Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2006). IQ and global inequality. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit.

Lynn, R., & Vanhanen, T. (2012). Intelligence: A unifying construct for the social sciences. London: Ulster Institute for Social Research.

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437.

Mas, A., & Moretti, E. (2009). Peers at work. American Economic Review, 99, 112–145.

McCann, R. J., Shi, X., Siow, A., & Wolthoff, R. P. (2012). Becker meets Ricardo: Multisector matching with social and cognitive skills. IZA Discussion Papers 6533. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2002). Cohesion and membership duration: Linking groups, relations and individuals in an ecology of affiliation. Advances in Group Processes, 19, 1–36.

Meisenberg, G. (2012). National IQ and economic outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 103–107.

Meisenberg, G., & Lynn, R. (2011). Intelligence: A measure of human capital in nations. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 36, 421–454.

Miguel, E., & Kremer, M. (2004). Worms: Identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica, 72, 159–217.

Minier, J. (2007). Nonlinearities and robustness in growth regressions. American Economic Review, 97, 388–392.

Owens, M. (2012). Responsibility-alleviation and other-regarding preferences with peer workers in labor markets: An experimental investigation. Journal of Labor Research, 33, 353–369.

Pencavel, J. (1998). Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands. American Economic Review, 88, 326–329.

Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Porter, M. E. (2000). Locations, clusters, and company strategy. In G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, & M. S. Gertler (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography, (pp. 253–274). Oxford University Press: Oxford,

Ram, R. (2007). IQ and economic growth: Further augmentation of Mankiw–Romer–Weil model. Economics Letters, 94, 7–11.

Ranci, C. (2011). Competitiveness and social cohesion in Western European cities. Urban Studies, 48, 2789–2804.

Ratcliffe, P., & Newman, I. (Eds.) (2011). Promoting social cohesion: Implications for policy and evaluation. Bristol: Policy Press.

Raven, P., Johnson, G. B., Mason, K. A., Losos, J. B., & Singer, S. S. (2011). Biology (9th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Rindermann, H. (2012). Intellectual classes, technological progress and economic development: The rise of cognitive capitalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 108–113.

Rindermann, H., & Heller, K. A. (2005). The benefit of gifted classes and talent schools for developing students’ competence and enhancing academic self-concept. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 133–136.

Rindermann, H., & Thompson, J. (2011). Cognitive capitalism: The effect of cognitive ability on wealth, as mediated through scientific achievement and economic freedom. Psychological Science, 22, 754–763.

Robinson, D. (2013). Peter Ratcliffe and Ines Newman (eds), Promoting Social Cohesion: Implications for Policy and Evaluation. International Sociology, 28, 552–555.

Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.

Shangquan, G. (2000). Economic globalization: Trends, risks and risk prevention. Peking: China Research Society for Restructuring the Economic System.

Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1971). The assignment game I: The core. International Journal of Game Theory, 1, 111–130.

Shimer, R., & Smith, L. (2000). Assortative matching and search. Econometrica, 68, 343–369.

Smith, L. (2006). The marriage model with search frictions. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 1124–1144.

Staber, U. (2007). Contextualizing research on social capital in regional clusters. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31, 505–521.

Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Cantner, U. (2014). Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, 42, 221–244.

Turok, I. (2005). Social cohesion as a factor of competitiveness and regional growth. Paper presented at the OECD International Conference ‘Sustainable Cities: Linking Competitiveness with Social Cohesion’, October, Montreal.

Uslaner, E. (2003). Trust, democracy and governance: Can government policies influence generalised trust?. In: M. Hooghe, & D. Stolle (Eds), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective, (pp. 171–190). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Weede, E., & Kämpf, S. (2002). The impact of intelligence and institutional improvements on economic growth. Kyklos, 55, 361–380.

Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wolf, P. S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2011). Fecundity, offspring longevity, and assortative mating: Parametric tradeoffs in sexual and life history strategy. Biodemography and Social Biology, 57, 171–183.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.

Zajenkowski, M., Stolarski, M., & Meisenberg, G. (2013). Openness, economic freedom and democracy moderate the relationship between national intelligence and GDP. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 391–398.