Why do Portuguese Railways Languish? An Application of Internalisation of Transport Related Externalities

Moreira, Paulo Pires (2017): Why do Portuguese Railways Languish? An Application of Internalisation of Transport Related Externalities.

Abstract

For the last ten years Portuguese railways has shown a gradual decrease in passengers’ annual figures; nearly 20 million. The major contributors are regional services and Lisbon’s commuting lines. Despite the number of passengers in the metropolitan area of Porto remains steady while the long-distance ridership market between the two major Portuguese cities, Lisbon and Porto presents a slightly growth starting in 2014, long-term perspectives for Portuguese railways are not optimistic. Lisbon and Porto, separated by a distance slightly greater than 300 km, are connected by the Northern Line, which was already competing with two parallel highways, is now facing a new threat in the form of an air-bridge launched one year ago with hourly airplane departures at very competitive ticket fares. There are clear indicators that this air-bridge will lure a large number of potential passengers away from long-distance rail therefore pressing up operator revenues over this important rail connection impacting its earning power: this line is responsible for more than 42% of the State-owned railways total earnings. Therefore, the aim of this article is to find why Portuguese rail languishes while air transport grows, increasing perverse results: climate change, health and non-health damages. Fuel exemption and the lack of excise duties produce enough market distortions to explain at some extent how aviation has seen such strong growth in demand at the expense of rail, but this market distortion do not tells the entire story. What is at stake is how to obtain a level playing field between the two modes. In that sense, it is necessary to internalise the social cost of carbon in a way to weight the real costs the society has actually to bear from each option because those costs are not borne by transport operators or users, but by society as a whole. After attach a money value to negative externalities, we identify as the root of the problem for the sustainability of Portuguese long-distance railways the lack of political will towards the internalisation of negative externalities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Negative externalities; Climate change; Air pollutants; Aviation; Railways, Case-study.
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R40 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy

References

Ang, G. & V. Marchal (2013). Mobilising Private Investment in Sustainable Transport: The Case of Land-Based Passenger Transport Infrastructure, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 56, OECD Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1787/5k46hjm8jpmv-en

ATAG – Air Transport Action Group: http://www.atag.org/facts-and-figures.html, accessed 2017-03-14

Budd, L. et al. (2013). Sustainable Aviation Future. ISBN: 978-1-78190-595-1

Burkhardt, U. & Kärcher, B. (2011). Global radiactive forcing from contrail cirrus. Nature Climate Change. DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1068

CIP – Confederation of Portuguese Business (2015). Logística em Portugal.

Comboios de Portugal. Annual Report 2015

Decision N. 406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020

European Commission Climate Action: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/aviation_en, accessed 2017-03-14

European Environment Agency, 2015. http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer-2015/countries/portugal. Accessed 2017-03-17

IEA (International Energy Agency). (2008). Energy Technologies Perspectives. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. OECD

IPCC (2014). Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Chapter 8: Transport

Komlos, J. (2016). Has Creative Destruction become more Destructive? The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 2016. 20160179

Korzhenevych, A. et al. (2014). Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport. Final Report. RICARDO - AEA/R/ ED57769. Issue number 1

McCollum, D. et al. (2009). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Aviation and Marine Transportation: Mitigation Potential and Policies. Pew Center on Global Climate Change

Pereira, A. (2011). Portugal na Hora da Verdade. Como vencer a crise nacional. Gradiva. ISBN: 978-989-616-413-3

The Observatory of Economic Complexity: http://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/prt/. Accessed 2017-04-11

United Nations Sustainable Development – The Future We Want. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/futurewewant.html