Mercenier, Jean and Voyvoda, Ebru (2018): On Barriers to Technology Adoption, Appropriate Technology and Deep Integration (with implications for the European Union).
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_86364.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Based on two strands of research, namely ‘barriers to technology adoption’ and ‘appropriate technology’, we propose a formal reappraisal of ‘deep integration’, a broad concept often used in trade policy discussions. We then evaluate the 2004-7 EU enlargement wave utilizing this operational reappraisal. More specifically, we first estimate, using 2007 data, total labor productivity (TLP) in the 27 EU member states, and show that in all but a few sectors, new member states clearly stand below the lower envelope technology frontier of the older members in their use of skilled and unskilled labor. We interpret this as being the result of past barriers to technology adoption that are likely to be removed by the integration process into the EU, with these new counties’ TLP shifting to the incumbent members’ lower envelope. We then explore the potential effects on all 27 EU member states of this ‘deep integration’ experiment using a calibrated intertemporal multisectoral general equilibrium model. Our main finding is that, for most parameter configurations, workers’ welfare in incumbent member countries is not negatively impacted despite the rather drastic improvement in competitiveness experienced by new members.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On Barriers to Technology Adoption, Appropriate Technology and Deep Integration (with implications for the European Union) |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Barriers to technology adoption, appropriate technology, technological upgrading, deep integration, European integration, calibrated general equilibrium |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E23 - Production F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R13 - General Equilibrium and Welfare Economic Analysis of Regional Economies |
Item ID: | 86364 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Ebru Voyvoda |
Date Deposited: | 27 Apr 2018 13:19 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 10:40 |
References: | Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson (2006). “Economic backwardness in political perspective”. In: American Political Science Review 100(1), pp. 115–131. Acemoglu, Daron and Fabriozo Zilibotti (2001). “Productivity differences”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2), pp. 563–606. Alesina, Alberto, Michele Battisti, and Joseph Zeira (2015). Technology and Labor Regulations: Theory and Evidence. Tech. rep. NBER Working Papers 20841. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.´ Alvarez-Mart´ınez, Mar´ıa Teresa and Montserrat L´opez-Cobo (2016). Social Accounting Matrices for the EU-27 in 2010. Building a new database for RHOMOLO. Tech. rep. JRC101673. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, DG-JRC, European Commission. Atkinson, Anthony B. and Joseph E. Stiglitz (1969). “A new view of technological change”. In: Economic Journal 79(315), pp. 573–578. Baldwin, Richard E. (1997). “The causes of regionalism”. In: The World Economy 20(7), pp. 865–888. Baldwin, Richard, Rikard Forslid, Philippe Martin, Gianmarco Ottaviano, and Frederic Robert-Nicoud (2003). Economic geography and Public Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Basu, Susanto and David Weil (1998). “Appropriate technology and growth”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4), pp. 1025–1054. Birdsall, Nancy and Robert Z. Lawrence (1999). “Deep integration and trade agreements: Good for developing countries?” In: Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Ed. by nge Kaul, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc Stern. Oxford Scholarship Online. Chap. 12. Caselli, Francesco and Wilbur John Coleman (2006). “World technology frontier”. In: American Economic Review 96(3), pp. 499–522. Comin, Diego and Bart Hobijn (2004). “Cross-country technology adoption: making the theories face the facts”. In: Journal of Monetary Economics 51, pp. 39–83. Dietzenbacher, Erik, Bart Los, Robert Stehrer, Marcel Timmer, and Gaaitzen de Vries (2013). “The construction of world input-output tables in the WIOD project”. In: Economic Systems Research 25(1), pp. 71–98. Diwan, Ishac and Dani Rodrik (1991). “Patents, appropriate technology, and North-South trade”. In: Journal of International Economics 30(1), pp. 27–47. Ethier, Wilfred J. (1998). “The new regionalism”. In: The Economic Journal 108, pp. 1149–1161. Ferraro, Domenico (2017). “Volatility and slow technology diffusion”. In: European Economic Review 96, pp. 18–37. Gasiorek, Michael and Peter Holmes (2008). Globalisation and deep integration. Tech. rep. The Centre for the Analysis of Regional Integration at Sussex, Sussex University. Horn, Henrik, Petros C. Mavroidis, and Andr´e Sapir (2010). “Beyond the WTO? An anatomy of EU and US preferential trade agreements”. In: The World Economy 33(11), pp. 1565–1588. Krugman, Paul (1991). “Increasing returns and economic geography”. In: Journal of Political Economy 99, pp. 83–499. Krugman, Paul and Anthony J. Venables (1995). “Globalization and the inequality of nations”. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, pp. 857-880. Lawrence, Robert Z. (1996). Regionalism, Multilateralism and Deeper Integrations. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press. Ludema, Rodney D. and Ian Wooton (2000). “Economic geography and the fiscal effects of regional integration”. In: Journal of International Economics 52, pp. 331–357. Mercenier, Jean (1995). “Nonuniqueness of solutions in applied general equilibrium models with scale economies and imperfect competition”. In: Economic Theory 6, pp. 161–177. Mercenier, Jean, Maria Teresa Alvarez-Mart´ınez, Andries Brandsma, Francesco Di Comite, Olga Diukanova, d’Artis Kancs, Patrizio Lecca, Montserrat L´opez Cobo, Philippe Monfort, Damiaan Persyn, Alexandra Rillaers, Mark Thissen, and Wouter Torfs (2016). RHOMOLO-v2 model description: A spatial com- putable general equilibrium model for EU regions and sectors. Tech. rep. JRC Technical Reports JRC100011. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, DG-JRC, European Commission. Mercenier, Jean and Philippe Michel (1994). “Discrete time finite horizon approximation of optimal growth with steady-state invariance”. In: Econometrica 62(3), pp. 635–656. Orefice, Gianluca and Nadia Rocha (2011). Deep integration and production networks: An empirical analysis. Tech. rep. Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-11. World Trade Organization. Parente, Stephen L. and Edward C. Prescott (1994). “Barriers to technology adoption and development”. In: Journal of Political Economy 102, pp. 298-321. — (2000). Barriers to Riches. Cambridge: Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Rodrik, Dani (2002). Feasible Globalizations. Tech. rep. NBER Working Paper No. 9129. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Roszkowska, Sylwia (2014). “Returns to education in Europe: same or not?” In: European Scientific Journal Special ed. Vol1. Vandenbussche, J´erˆome, Philippe Aghion, and Costas Meghir (2006). “Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital”. In: Journal of Economic Growth 11(2), pp. 97–127. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/86364 |