Nonparametric identification of static multinomial choice models

Otero, Karina V. (2016): Nonparametric identification of static multinomial choice models.

Abstract

This paper proposes a new nonparametric identification strategy for static multiple choice models with random heterogeneity in unobservables. The strategy relies on functional properties of the sub-utilities and the distribution of the unobservables, a known payoff function for the “outside option” and exclusion restrictions for all but one alternative. This new strategy does not transform the multiple choice model into a set of binary models, does not need “special regressors”, additive separability on observables or differentiability conditions. Some ideas for this new identification strategy are borrowed from Theorem 2 in Matzkin (1993) that intends to identify all the sub-utility functions but one and also the distribution of the shocks in differences. However, the proof of this published theorem is incorrect and this paper is the first literature pointing this out and providing a new proof of a different version of the theorem after modifications of its assumptions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Nonparametric identification, Markov decision processes, discrete choice.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation

References

Berry, S., and P. Haile (2009): “Identification of discrete choice demand from market-level data,” Manuscript, Yale University.

Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes (1995): “Automobile prices in market equilibrium,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society , pp. 841–890.

Briesch, R. A., P. K. Chintagunta, and R. L. Matzkin (2010): “Nonparametric discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics.

Chiappori, P., and I. Komunjer (2009): “On the nonparametric identification of multiple choice models,” Manuscript, Columbia University.

Chintagunta, P. K., and B. E. Honore (1996): “Investigating the effects of marketing variables and unobserved heterogeneity in a multinomial probit model,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 1–15.

Lewbel, A. (2000): “Semiparametric qualitative response model estimation with unknown heteroscedasticity or instrumental variables,” Journal of Econometrics , 97(1), 145–177.

Manski, C. F. (1975): “Maximum score estimation of the stochastic utility model of choice,” Journal of econometrics , 3(3), 205–228.

Matzkin, R. L. (1993): “Nonparametric identification and estimation of polychotomous choice models,” Journal of Econometrics , 58(1–2), 137–168.

Matzkin, R. L. (2013): “Nonparametric identification in structural economic models,” Annu. Rev. Econ. , 5(1), 457–486.

McFadden, D. (1973): “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior,” Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142.

Nevo, A. (2001): “Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry,” Econometrica , 69(2), 307–342.