M. Rouhani, Omid (2019): Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91451.pdf Download (461kB) |
Abstract
In this paper, I briefly review the key methods to evaluate transportation projects. These methods are: Financial analysis; Cost benefit (economic analysis); Multi-criteria analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Social welfare analysis; and Risk analysis (Monte Carlo simulation). The importance of understanding these methods lies in the fact that transportation projects offer huge social benefits and costs; some are impossible or very complex to measure in monetary terms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches |
English Title: | Transportation Project Evaluation Methods/Approaches |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Project evaluation methods, Transport projects, Social cost benefit analysis, Multi-criteria analysis, and Social welfare analysis. |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 91451 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Omid. Rouhani |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jan 2019 10:03 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:11 |
References: | Altshuler, Alan, James P. Womack, and John R. Pucher, 1980. "The urban transportation system: Politics and policy innovation." Journal of Economic Literature 18, no. 3. Arrow, K. J., & Lind, R. C., 1978. “Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions.” In Uncertainty in Economics (pp. 403-421). Beheshtian et al. (2017). "Planning resilient motor-fuel supply chain" International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 24 (2017): 312-325. Bertolini, M., Braglia, M., & Carmignani, G., 2006. “Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract.” International Journal of Project Management, 24(5), 422-430. Booth, P., & Schulz, A. K. D., 2004. “The impact of an ethical environment on managers' project evaluation judgments under agency problem conditions.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5-6), 473-488. Daher, N., F. Yasmin, M. Wang, E. Moradi, and O. M. Rouhani. (2018) "Perceptions, Preferences, and Behavior Regarding Energy and Environmental Costs: The Case of Montreal Transport Users." Sustainability 10, 2 (2018): 514. Diewert, W. E., 1983. “Cost-benefit analysis and project evaluation: A comparison of alternative approaches.” Journal of Public Economics, 22(3), 265-302. Dey, P. K., 2006. “Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique.” International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 90-103. Do, W.; Rouhani, O.M.; Geddes, R.; Beheshtian, A. (2019). A Comprehensive Welfare Impact Analysis for Road Expansion Projects: A Case Study. Working paper. Jones, H. L., Moura, F., & Domingos, T., 2018. “Transportation Infrastructure Project Evaluation: Transforming CBA to Include a Life Cycle Perspective.” In Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research (pp. 745-771). Springer, Cham. Lin, C. Y., et al. (2009) "The implications of an E10 ethanol-blend policy for California." California State Controller John Chiang Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements 5.5 (2009): 6-7. Litman, T. (2017). “Community cohesion as a transport planning objective.” Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Macharis, C., De Witte, A., & Ampe, J., 2009. The multi‐actor, multi‐criteria analysis methodology (MAMCA) for the evaluation of transport projects: Theory and practice. Journal of Advanced transportation, 43(2), 183-202. Madani, K., et al. (2014) "A negotiation support system for resolving an international trans-boundary natural resource conflict." Environmental modelling & software 51 (2014): 240-249. National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission (NSTIFC), 2009. “Paying Our Way: A New Framework for Transportation Finance”, February 2009, 108, https://financecommission.dot.gov/Documents/NSTIF_Commission_Final_Report_Mar09FNL.pdf (accessed February 5, 2017). Nocera, S., Tonin, S., & Cavallaro, F., 2015. “The economic impact of greenhouse gas abatement through a meta-analysis: Valuation, consequences and implications in terms of transport policy.” Transport Policy, 37, 31-43. Poorzahedy, H., & Rouhani, O. M. (2007). “Hybrid meta-heuristic algorithms for solving network design problem.” European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 578-596. Policy EU Guide (2008). “Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects.” The EU. https://ec.europa.eu/inea/sites/inea/files/cba_guide_cohesion_policy.pdf (accessed February 5, 2017). Pohl, G., & Mihaljek, D., 1992. “Project evaluation and uncertainty in practice: A statistical analysis of rate-of-return divergences of 1,015 World Bank projects.” The World Bank Economic Review, 6(2), 255-277. Rouhani, O.M. et al. (2013) “Integrated modeling framework for leasing urban roads: A case study of Fresno, California.” Transportation Research Part B, 48 (1): 17-30.1 Rouhani, O. M. (2013) "Clean development mechanism: an appropriate approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation." Transportation Research Board 92 (2013). Rouhani, O.M., and A. Beheshtian (2013) “Social and Private Costs of Driving.” Lecture presentation at the 2013 Annual Conference of the International Transportation Economics Association, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Rouhani, O.M., and D. Niemeier (2011). “Urban Network Privatization: Example of a Small Network.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2221), 46-56. Rouhani, O.M., and D. Niemeier (2014a) “Resolving the Property Right of Transportation Emissions through Public-Private Partnerships.” Transportation Research Part D, 31: 48-60. Rouhani, O.M., and D. Niemeier (2014b) “Flat versus Spatially Variable Tolling: A Case Study in Fresno, California.” Journal of Transport Geography, 37, 10-18. Rouhani, O.M., and H. Zarei (2014) “Fuel Consumption Information: An Alternative for Congestion Pricing?” Road and Transport Research, 23(3), 52-64. Rouhani, O.M., and H.O. Gao (2014) “An Advanced Traveler General Information System for Fresno, CA”, Transportation Research Part A, 67: 254-267. Rouhani, O. M. (2012) Frameworks for public-private partnerships. University of California, Davis, 2012. Rouhani, O. M. (2016) "Next Generations of Road Pricing: Social Welfare Enhancing." Sustainability 8.3 (2016): 1-15. Rouhani, O. M. (2018) "Beyond Standard Zonal Congestion Pricing: A Detailed Impact Analysis." Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems 144, 9 (2018): 04018052. Rouhani, O. M., and A. Beheshtian. (2016) "Energy Management." Book chapter in Multi Vol. Set on Energy Science and Technology. Rouhani, O. M., and H. O. Gao. (2016) "Evaluating various road ownership structures and potential competition on an urban road network." Networks and Spatial Economics 16.4 (2016): 1019-1042. Rouhani, O. M. et al. (2014) "Road supply in central London: Addition of an ignored social cost." Journal of the Transportation Research Forum. Vol. 53. No. 1. Transportation Research Forum, 2014. Rouhani, O. M., et al. (2015a) "Policy lessons for regulating public–private partnership tolling schemes in urban environments." Transport Policy 41 (2015): 68-79. Rouhani, O. M., et al. (2015b) “Implications of fuel and emissions externalities, spillovers to the outside, and temporal variations on zonal congestion pricing schemes.” TRB paper No. 15-0905. 2015. Rouhani, O. M., et al. (2016a) "Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects." Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 88 (2016): 86-103. Rouhani, O. M., et al. (2016b) "Cost-benefit analysis of various California renewable portfolio standard targets: Is a 33% RPS optimal?" Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62 (2016): 1122-1132. Rouhani, O. M., et al. (2018) "Revenue-Risk-Sharing Approaches for Public-Private Partnership Provision of Highway Facilities." Case Studies on Transport Policy , in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.04.003. Samset, K., & Christensen, T., 2017. “Ex ante project evaluation and the complexity of early decision-making.” Public Organization Review, 17(1), 1-17. Weisbrod, G., & Weisbrod, B., 1997. “Assessing the economic impact of transportation projects: How to choose the appropriate technique for your project.” Transportation Research Circular, (477). Winston, C., 2012, “U.S. Transportation System Performance: It’s Effects on the Economy and Alternative Policy Reforms”, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution working paper, 2012. Van Wee, B. (2012). “How suitable is CBA for the ex-ante evaluation of transport projects and policies? A discussion from the perspective of ethics.” Transport Policy, 19(1), 1-7. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91451 |