Yang, Bill Huajian
(2019):
*Resolutions to flip-over credit risk and beyond.*
Published in: Big Data and Information Analytics
, Vol. 3, No. 2
(18 March 2019): pp. 54-67.

PDF
MPRA_paper_93389.pdf Download (284kB) |

## Abstract

Abstract Given a risk outcome y over a rating system {R_i }_(i=1)^k for a portfolio, we show in this paper that the maximum likelihood estimates with monotonic constraints, when y is binary (the Bernoulli likelihood) or takes values in the interval 0≤y≤1 (the quasi-Bernoulli likelihood), are each given by the average of the observed outcomes for some consecutive rating indexes. These estimates are in average equal to the sample average risk over the portfolio and coincide with the estimates by least squares with the same monotonic constraints. These results are the exact solution of the corresponding constrained optimization. A non-parametric algorithm for the exact solution is proposed. For the least squares estimates, this algorithm is compared with “pool adjacent violators” algorithm for isotonic regression. The proposed approaches provide a resolution to flip-over credit risk and a tool to determine the fair risk scales over a rating system.

Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|

Original Title: | Resolutions to flip-over credit risk and beyond |

Language: | English |

Keywords: | risk scale, maximum likelihood, least squares, isotonic regression, flip-over credit risk |

Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C18 - Methodological Issues: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C65 - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C67 - Input-Output Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C80 - General G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G17 - Financial Forecasting and Simulation G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G35 - Payout Policy |

Item ID: | 93389 |

Depositing User: | Dr. Bill Huajian Yang |

Date Deposited: | 22 Apr 2019 18:47 |

Last Modified: | 22 Apr 2019 18:48 |

References: | [1] Anderson, R. (2007). The Credit Scoring Toolkit: Theory and Practice for Retail Credit Risk Management and Decision Automation. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press. [2] Barlow, R. E.; Bartholomew, D. J.; Bremner, J. M.; Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical inference under order restrictions; the theory and application of isotonic regression. New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-04970-0. [3] Best, M.J.; Chakravarti N. (1990). Active set algorithms for isotonic regression; a unifying framework. Mathematical Programming. 47: 425–439. doi:10.1007/BF0158087 [4] Eichenberg, T. (2018). Supervised Weight of Evidence Binning of Numeric Variables and Factors, R-Package Woebinning. [5] Friedman, J. and Tibshirani, R. (1984). The Monotone Smoothing of Scatterplots. Technometrics,Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 243-250. DOI: 10.2307/1267550 [6] Kotlowski, W. and Slowinski, R. (2009). Rule Learning with Monotonicity Constraints, Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, pp537-544, 2009 [7] Kotsiantis, S. and Kanellopoulos, D (2006). Discretization Techniques: A recent survey, GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering. 32 (1): 47–58. [8] Leeuw, J. D, Hornik, K. and Mair, P. (2009). Isotone Optimization in R: Pool-Adjacent- Violators Algorithm (PAVA) and Active Set Methods, Journal of statistical software 32(5). DOI: 10.18637/jssw.v032.i05 [9] Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. J. (2006). Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer. [10] Papke, L. E., Wooldrige, J. M (1996). Econometric methods for fraction response variables with application to 401 (k) plan participation rates, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 11, 619-632 [11] Potharst, R. and Feelders, A. J. (2002). Classification Trees for Problems with Monotonicity Constraints, SIGKDD Explorations, Vol. 14 (1): 1-10, 2002 [12] Ramsay, J. O. and Wickham, H. and Graves, S. and Hooker G. (2018). Package ‘fda’- CRAN.R- Project, pp. 265-267 [13] Robertson, T.; Wright, F. T.; Dykstra, R. L. (1998). Order Restricted Statistical Inference, John Wiley & Son. [14] SAS Institute Inc (2014). SAS/STAT(R) 13.2 User’s Guide [15] Siddiqi, N. 2006: Credit Risk Scorecards: Developing and Implementing Intelligent Credit Scoring, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. [16] Tasche, D. (2013). The art of PD curve calibration, Journal of Credit Risk, 9 (4), 63-103. DOI: 10.21314/JCR.2013.169 [17] Van der Burgt, M. (2008). Calibrating low-default portfolios, using the cumulative accuracy profile, Journal of Risk Model validation, 1 (4), 17-33. [18] Yang, B. H. (2018). Smoothing Algorithms by Constrained Maximum Likelihood, Journal of Risk Model Validation, Volume 12 (2), pp. 89-102 [19] You, S.; Ding, D.; Canini, K.;Pfeifer, J. and Gupta, M. (2017). Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functions, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing System (NIPS), 2017 |

URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93389 |