Santos, João and Borges, Afonso and Domingos, Tiago (2020): Exploring the links between total factor productivity, final-to-useful exergy efficiency, and economic growth: Case study Portugal 1960-2014.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100214.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Mainstream economic growth models downplay the role of energy, while attributing most of growth to an exogenous residual – total factor productivity (TFP). This makes them unsuitable to tackle the challenge of marrying sustainability and economic development targets. Meanwhile, research suggests that measuring energy at the stage where it’s actually productive (useful), and in exergy terms (in thermodynamics, the potential to do work), unlocks new insights concerning energy’s strong link with economic output. In this work we test for relationship linking TFP and final-to-useful (F-to-U) exergy efficiency, resorting to both observational and statistical methods (cointegration). Several models are considered, assessing the impact of: a) disaggregating capital inputs (i.e. buildings, stationary, non-stationary); b) quality-adjusting labour; c) disaggregating F-to-U exergy efficiency (stationary and non-stationary end-uses). Results for Portugal (1960-2014) show that TFP can be proxied by changes in F-to-U exergy efficiency, namely for stationary end-uses. This link is strengthened when disaggregate capital, and schooling-corrected labour measures are considered. When TFP is estimated as a function of F-to-U exergy efficiency, virtually all of long-term economic growth is explained by directly measurable capital, labour, and exergy efficiency in production. Resulting models provide satisfactory explanations of economic growth, founded on energy use and efficiency.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Exploring the links between total factor productivity, final-to-useful exergy efficiency, and economic growth: Case study Portugal 1960-2014 |
English Title: | Exploring the links between total factor productivity, final-to-useful exergy efficiency, and economic growth: Case study Portugal 1960-2014 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic growth; total factor productivity; energy efficiency; useful exergy; aggregate production function; cointegration analysis |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy |
Item ID: | 100214 |
Depositing User: | Mr. João Santos |
Date Deposited: | 11 May 2020 16:37 |
Last Modified: | 11 May 2020 16:37 |
References: | Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. In Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870 (pp. 1-23). NBER. AMECO (2019). European Commission’s annual macro-economic database. Available online at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/ameco/index_en.htm. Ayres, R. U. (2001). The minimum complexity of endogenous growth models: the role of physical resource flows. Energy, 26(10), 817-838. Ayres, R. U., & Warr, B. (2005). Accounting for growth: the role of physical work. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(2), 181-209. Berlemann, M., & Wesselhöft, J. E. (2014). Estimating aggregate capital stocks using the perpetual inventory method. Review of Economics, 65(1), 1-34. Brockway, P., Sorrell, S., Foxon, T., & Miller, J. (2018). Exergy economics: new insights into energy consumption and economic growth. Caselli, F. (2005). Accounting for cross-country income differences. Handbook of economic growth, 1, 679-741. Cleveland, C. J., Kaufmann, R. K., & Stern, D. I. (2000). Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 301-317. d'Arge, R. C., & Kogiku, K. C. (1973). Economic growth and the environment. The Review of Economic Studies, 40(1), 61-77. Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (2001). What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models. The world bank economic review, 15(2), 177-219. Feenstra, Robert C., Robert Inklaar and Marcel P. Timmer (2015), "The Next Generation of the Penn World Table" American Economic Review, 105(11), 3150-3182, available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt Ghali, K. H., & El-Sakka, M. I. (2004). Energy use and output growth in Canada: a multivariate cointegration analysis. Energy economics, 26(2), 225-238. Griliches, Z., & Jorgenson, D. W. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249-283. Gross, L. S., & Veendorp, E. C. H. (1990). Growth with Exhaustible Resources and a Materials‐Balance Production Function. Natural Resource Modeling, 4(1), 77-94. Heun, M. K., & Brockway, P. E. (2019). Meeting 2030 primary energy and economic growth goals: Mission impossible?. Applied Energy, 251, 112697. http://www.bcsdportugal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Technical_Report_Meet2030_final_WEB.pdf Hulten, C. R. (2001). Total factor productivity: a short biography. In New developments in productivity analysis (pp. 1-54). University of Chicago Press. Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Business Council for Sustainable Development for Portugal (BCSD Portugal) (2018). Meet 2030 - Business, Climate Change and Economic Growth. Technical Report. BCSD Portugal, Jäger, K. (2016). EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts 2016 release-Description of Methodology and General Notes. In The Conference Board Europe. Available at: http://www. euklems. net/TCB/2016/Metholology_EU% 20KLEMS_2016. pdf. Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Stiroh, K. J. (2008). A retrospective look at the US productivity growth resurgence. Journal of Economic perspectives, 22(1), 3-24. Jorgenson, D., Gollop, F. M., & Fraumeni, B. (2016). Productivity and US economic growth. Elsevier. Kaldor, N. (1957). A model of economic growth. The economic journal, 67(268), 591-624. Koszerek, D., Havik, K., Mc Morrow, K., Röger, W., & Schönborn, F. (2007). An overview of the EU KLEMS growth and productivity accounts (No. 290). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission. Kümmel, R. (1989). Energy as a factor of production and entropy as a pollution indicator in macroeconomic modelling. Ecological Economics, 1(2), 161-180.Sakai, M., Brockway, P. E., Barrett, J. R., & Taylor, P. G. (2019). Thermodynamic efficiency gains and their role as a key ‘engine of economic growth’. Energies, 12(1), 110. Kümmel, R., Lindenberger, D., & Eichhorn, W. (2000). The productive power of energy and economic evolution. Indian Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2), 1-26. Kümmel, R., Schmid, J., Ayres, R. U., & Lindenberger, D. (2008). Cost shares, output elasticities, and substitutability constraints (No. 08, 02). EWI Working Paper. Lindenberger, D., & Kümmel, R. (2002). Energy-dependent production functions and the optimization model “PRISE” of price-induced sectoral evolution. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 5(3), 101-107. Lindenberger, D., & Kümmel, R. (2011). Energy and the state of nations. Energy, 36(11), 6010-6018. Lütkepohl, H., Krätzig, M., & Phillips, P. C. (Eds.). (2004). Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge university press. Lutz, W., Goujon, A., KC, S., Stonawski, M., & Stilianakis, N. (2018). Demographic and Human Capital Scenarios for the 21st Century: 2018 assessment for 201 countries. Publications Office of the European Union. O’Mahony, M., Castaldi, C., Los, B., Bartelsman, E., Maimaiti, Y., & Peng, F. (2008). EUKLEMS-Linked data: Sources and methods. University of Birmingham. Oulton, N., & Wallis, G. (2015). Integrated estimates of capital stocks and services for the United Kingdom: 1950-2013. Prindle, B., Eldridge, M., Eckhardt, M., & Frederick, A. (2007). The twin pillars of sustainable energy: synergies between energy efficiency and renewable energy technology and policy. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: a further update. Education economics, 12(2), 111-134. Santos, J., Domingos, T., Sousa, T., & Aubyn, M. S. (2018). Useful exergy is key in obtaining plausible aggregate production functions and recognizing the role of energy in economic growth: Portugal 1960–2009. Ecological Economics, 148, 103-120. Saunders, H. D. (2008). Fuel conserving (and using) production functions. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2184-2235. Serrenho, A. C., Sousa, T., Warr, B., Ayres, R. U., & Domingos, T. (2014). Decomposition of useful work intensity: The EU (European Union)-15 countries from 1960 to 2009. Energy, 76, 704-715. Serrenho, A. C., Warr, B., Sousa, T., Ayres, R. U., & Domingos, T. (2016). Structure and dynamics of useful work along the agriculture-industry-services transition: Portugal from 1856 to 2009. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 36, 1-21. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics, 312-320. Sousa, T., Brockway, P. E., Cullen, J. M., Henriques, S. T., Miller, J., Serrenho, A. C., & Domingos, T. (2017). The need for robust, consistent methods in societal exergy accounting. Ecological Economics, 141, 11-21. Stern, D. I. (1997). Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: a neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics. Ecological economics, 21(3), 197-215. Stern, D. I. (2000). A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy economics, 22(2), 267-283. Stresing, R., Lindenberger, D., & Kümmel, R. (2008). Cointegration of output, capital, labor, and energy. The European Physical Journal B, 66(2), 279-287. Swan, T. W. (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic record, 32(2), 334-361. Tintner, G., Deutsch, E., Rieder, R., & Rosner, P. (1977). A production function for Austria emphasizing energy. De Economist, 125(1), 75-94. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248. Van Ark, B. (2014). Total factor productivity: Lessons from the past and directions for the future (No. 271). NBB Working Paper. van den Bergh, J. C., & Nijkamp, P. (1994). Dynamic macro modelling and materials balance: Economic-environmental integration for sustainable development. Economic Modelling, 11(3), 283-307. Warr, B. S., & Ayres, R. U. (2010). Evidence of causality between the quantity and quality of energy consumption and economic growth. Energy, 35(4), 1688-1693. Warr, B., & Ayres, R. (2006). REXS: A forecasting model for assessing the impact of natural resource consumption and technological change on economic growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17(3), 329-378. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100214 |