Berceanu, Ionut Bogdan and Mititelu, Cristina (2016): The Impact of Economic Crisis on the Emerging Administrations from Southeastern Europe. Case Study: Romania. Published in: Dogaru T. , Cărăușan M. V., Peculea - Dumitrescu A., Berceanu I.B. (eds.). Re(forming) Public Administration Paradigms in Global Governance Context, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest , Vol. 1, No. ISBN 978-973-709-805-4 (2016): pp. 145-162.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100365.pdf Download (7MB) | Preview |
Abstract
After 7 February 2007, the date on which in the United States was the beginning of the mega-global economic crisis, the financial world is vastly different and its reshaping is likely to persist for years or even decades. The consequences of the economic crisis extended beyond the economy itself. It affected the entire World, with a considerable impact on the EU Member States. The economies of the countries have been altered dramatically, and their patterns of governance have changed. One of these components of the models of governance is the public administration system. The paper can be included in the interdisciplinary field of administrative sciences, where the study of the economy plays an important role. The aim of the study is to analyze the impact of the crisis on the public administrations from Southeastern Europe, and the role of the anti-crisis measures taken at the level of the governance process of public administration. Therfore, the research attempts to provide an answer to a number of central research questions: 1. How the economic crises affected the emerging administrations from Southeastern Europe? 2. What were the anti-crisis measures taken at the level of public administration?
The study is mainly qualitative based, and tries to identify in which consisted the impact of the economic crisis. It will be focused on the Southeastern European region, a region with some economic and democratic particularities due to the historical legacies of the totalitarian regimes it had. In particular, the paper focus on a case study- Romania public administration- a country from the Southeastern Europe. The paper develops on the premises that Romania public administration system was altered directly by the crises and the measures undertaken to reduce its impact. The research raises the awareness for academics and practitioners to the hardships that transition countries and emerging administrations from Southeastern Europe had to face in keeping the governmental system functionally. On these grounds, specialists can quickly realize how important it is to adapt administrative values and to rethink the reforms to rapidly changing environment.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Impact of Economic Crisis on the Emerging Administrations from Southeastern Europe. Case Study: Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | emergence, changing environment, economic crisis, public administration, European Union. |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H12 - Crisis Management K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K10 - General N - Economic History > N0 - General |
Item ID: | 100365 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Bogdan Berceanu |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2020 05:15 |
Last Modified: | 15 May 2020 05:16 |
References: | Altman R.C., 2009, The great crash, 2008: a geopolitical setback for the west, foreign affair, the council on Foreign Relations. Online available at: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/63714/roger-c-altman/the-great-crash-2008, accessed on: 27 February 2015. Bartlett W., Uvalić M., The Social Consequences of the Global Economic Crisis in South East Europe, LSEE, June 2013. Bercu A.M., Bedrule M.V., 2012, Human Resource Involvement in Romanian Public Organizations under the Financial Constraints, Procedia Economics and Finance, No. 3 pp. 451 – 456. Boc E., 2011, The Reform of the State in Romania (2009-2011), Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 34E. BUILD SEE, 2014, Addressing the divide between the EU indications and their practical implementation in he green construction and eco-social re-qualification of residential areas in South East Europe regions, Work Package 3, Country report Romania. Casesse S. et al. (ed.), 2012, Global Administrative Law: An Italian Perspective, RSCAS Policy Paper, 38. Dogaru C.T., 2014, The national policy-making process in the context of the international economic and financial movements, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 143, pp. 964 – 970 Falconer J., 2002, Emergence happens! Misguided paradigms regarding organizational change and the role of complexity and patterns in the change landscape. Emergence, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117–130. Ganev V., 2001, The separation of party and state as a logistical problem: a glance at the causes of state weakness in post-communism, East European Politics and Societies , Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 389–420. Heise A., Lierse H., 2011, The effects of european austerity programmes on social security systems, Modern Economy, 2, in Will Bartlett and Milica Uvalić, The Social Consequences of the Global Economic Crisis in South East Europe, LSEE, June 2013. Holman P., 2007, Engaging Emergence. Turning upheaval into opprtunity, San Francisco: Barett-Koehler Press. Holman, P., 2013, A call to engage: Realizing the potential of dialogic organization development, OD Practitioner, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 18–24. International Monetary Fund (2015), Romania Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, IMF Country Report No. 15/67, Washington DC. International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2009, Romania received support from the IMF to counter crisis, Int Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2009/int050409a.htm, accessed: 14 March 2015. International Monetary Fund, 2015, Romania Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, IMF Country Report No. 15/67, Washington DC. Kickert W., 2013, How the Danish Government Responded to the Financial Crisis, Public Money and Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 55-62. Matei A., Berceanu B., 2014, Systemic Aspects of Public Administration. Emerging Administrations, Lambert Academic Publishing House: Germany. Matei L., 2009, Romanian Public Management Reform, Volume 1, Administration and Public Services, Volume 2, Civil Service, Economica Publishing House, Bucharest. Michod R., 2005,. On the transfer of fitness from the cell to the multicellular organism, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 20, pp. 967–987. Mititelu C., 2014, Trajectories of Public Sector reforms and Citizen participation. Exploring the Determinants for Collaboration with Citizens, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy. Mitra P., Selowsky M., Zalduendo J., 2010, Turmoil at Twenty: Recession, Recovery, and Reform in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Washington, the World Bank, available online at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ECAEXT/Resources/258598-1256842123621/65253331256842182547/t20-fullreport.pdf., accessed: 1st April 2015. Nanto D.K., 2009, The global financial crisis: analysis and policy implications, CRS report for Congress RL34742, Congr Res Serv. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34742.pdf, accessed on: 28 February 2015. Napolitano G., 2012, The ‘puzzle’ of global governance after the financial crisis, in Cassese S. et al. (ed.), 2012, Global Administrative Law: An Italian Perspective, RSCAS Policy Paper. Paul Vass A., Alexe I., 2012, Comparative Analysis of South Eastern Europe Economies Facing the Crisis.Future Prospects for the Region, Romanian Journal of European Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 2, June Peters G.B. et al., 2011, Global Financial Crisis, Public Administration and Governance: Do New Problems Require New Solutions?, Public Organization Review, No. 11, pp. 13–27.Peters G.B.,1999, Institutional Theory in Political Science. The “New Institutionalism”, London: Pinter. Pierson P., 2000, Increasing Returns, Path Dependence and the Study of Politics, American Political Science Review 94, pp. 251-67. Regulation no. 407/2010 of the Council of 11 May 2010. Şerban D., 2007, Citizen participation in local governance in Southeast Europe- Driven by the community need or ‘imposed’ by the donors’ program?, Local Development Group (GDL), Paper presented to Summer School Torino. Retrived at www.dsp.unito.it., accessed: 1st April 2015. Stella L., 2014, Austerity politics and administrative reform: The Eurozone crisis and its impact upon Greek public administration, Comparative European Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 184–208. Stockhammer E., Sotirppulos P.D., 2014, Europe in Crisis: Introduction, Review of Political Economy, Routledge, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 167–170. Tesu M.D., 2011, Ways to Finance Investments within the Local Public Administration, Economia, Management Issue, Vol. 14, No. 2. Van de Walle S., Jilke S., 2014, Savings in public services after the crisis: a multilevel analysis of public preferences in the EU-27, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Sage, Vol. 80, No. 3, pp. 597–618. Voinea L., 2009, Sfarsitul economiei iluziei. Criza si anticriza. O abordare heterodoxă, Ed. Publica Publishing House: Bucharest. Voinea L., Ion I., 2013, Romania: The Need for a New Development Model, in The Social Consequences of the Global Economic Crisis in South East Europe, LSEE, June 2013. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100365 |