Drichoutis, Andreas C. and Grimm, Veronika and Karakostas, Alexandros (2020): Bribing to Queue-Jump: An experiment on cultural differences in bribing attitudes among Greeks and Germans.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102775.pdf Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study the role of culture on bribing attitudes in a new dynamic bribery game, where the purpose of bribing is to receive a service earlier by bribing to queue-jump. Our queue-jumping game allows us to distinguish between two classes of bribes: (i) queue-jumping bribes, which aim to increase the briber's expected earnings by jumping the queue, and (ii) counter bribes, which aim to maintain the briber's expected earnings by upholding the current order in the queue. In a laboratory experiment, comprised of four treatments that differ in the number of Greeks and Germans in each group, we analyze both cross-cultural and inter-cultural differences in bribing attitudes. In our cross-cultural treatments, we find that Greeks tend to bribe more often than Germans, but only in the early periods of the game. As time progresses, the Germans quickly catch-up, bribing as often as the Greeks. However, the observed differences in bribe rates in the early periods of the game are driven by queue-jumping bribes rather than counter-bribes. As the ratio of counter-bribes to queue-jumping bribes is significantly lower among Greeks relative to Germans, bribing to queue-jump is more profitable in the Greek groups. In our inter-cultural treatments, we find that minorities, irrespective of nationality, bribe less, despite there are no prospects for monetary or reputational gains. We interpret this result as evidence of outgroup favoritism by minority groups.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Bribing to Queue-Jump: An experiment on cultural differences in bribing attitudes among Greeks and Germans |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Antisocial Behavior; Corruption; Cross-Country Experiment; Inter-country Experiment; Social Norms |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games ; Evolutionary Games ; Repeated Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H49 - Other Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General |
Item ID: | 102775 |
Depositing User: | Andreas Drichoutis |
Date Deposited: | 06 Sep 2020 21:26 |
Last Modified: | 06 Sep 2020 21:26 |
References: | Abbink, K., U. Dasgupta, L. Gangadharan, and T. Jain (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. Journal of Public Economics 111, 17-28. Abbink, K., E. Freidin, L. Gangadharan, and R. Moro (2018, 07). The Effect of Social Norms on Bribe Offers. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 34 (3), 457-474. Abbink, K., B. Irlenbusch, and E. Renner (2002). An experimental bribery game. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 18 (2), 428-454. Abbink, K. and D. Serra (2012). Chapter 4 Anticorruption Policies: Lessons from the Lab, Volume 15 of Research in Experimental Economics, pp. 77-115. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Abbink, K. and K. Wu (2017). Reward self-reporting to deter corruption: An experiment on mitigating collusive bribery. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 133, 256 - 272. Abeler, J., A. Falk, L. Goette, and D. Huffman (2011). Reference points and effort provision. American Economic Review 101 (2), 470-92. Achim, M. V., V. L. Vaidean, and S. N. Borlea (2020). Corruption and health outcomes within an economic and cultural framework. The European Journal of Health Economics 21 (2), 195-207. Ackert, L. F., N. Charupat, B. K. Church, and R. Deaves (2006). An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experimental Economics 9 (1), 5-16. Alatas, V., L. Cameron, A. Chaudhuri, N. Erkal, and L. Gangadharan (2009). Gender, culture, and corruption: Insights from an experimental analysis. Southern Economic Journal 75 (3), 663-680. Anderson, J., S. V. Burks, J. Carpenter, L. G�otte, K. Maurer, D. Nosenzo, R. Potter, K. Rocha, and A. Rustichini (2013). Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of otherregarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples. Experimental Economics 16 (2), 170-189. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal 100 (401), 464-477. Azfar, O. and W. R. Nelson (2007). Transparency, wages, and the separation of powers: An experimental analysis of corruption. Public Choice 130 (3), 471-493. Banerjee, R. (2016a). Corruption, norm violation and decay in social capital. Journal of Public Economics 137, 14 - 27. Banerjee, R. (2016b). On the interpretation of bribery in a laboratory corruption game: moral frames and social norms. Experimental Economics 19 (1), 240-267. Banuri, S. and C. Eckel (2012). The effects of sanctions on bribery: US versus pakistan. CBEES Working Paper Series 09-01 . Banuri, S. and C. Eckel (2015). Cracking down on bribery. Social Choice and Welfare 45 (3), 579-600. Barr, A. and D. Serra (2010). Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics 94 (11-12), 862-869. Becker, G. S. and G. J. Stigler (1974). Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. The Journal of Legal Studies 3 (1), 1-18. Bellemare, C., S. Kr�oger, and A. Van Soest (2008). Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica 76 (4), 815-839. Belot, M., R. Duch, and L. Miller (2015). A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 113, 26 - 33. Benabou, R. and J. Tirole (2006, December). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review 96 (5), 1652-1678. Bicchieri, C., E. Dimant, S. Gaechter, and D. Nosenzo (2020). Observability, Social Proximity, and the Erosion of Norm Compliance. Technical report. Bo, L., Y. Wang, and X. Yang (2011). Some integral functionals of reflected sdes and their applications in finance. Quantitative Finance 11 (3), 343-348. Borjas, G. J. (2019, May). Immigration and economic growth. Working Paper 25836, National Bureau of Economic Research. Bornhorst, F., A. Ichino, O. Kirchkamp, K. H. Schlag, and E. Winter (2010). Similarities and differences when building trust: the role of cultures. Experimental Economics 13 (3), 260-283. Boubtane, E., J.-C. Dumont, and C. Rault (2016, 02). Immigration and economic growth in the OECD countries 19862006. Oxford Economic Papers 68 (2), 340-360. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1 (3), 185-216. Cameron, L., A. Chaudhuri, N. Erkal, and L. Gangadharan (2009). Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from australia, india, indonesia and singapore.Journal of Public Economics 93 (7-8), 843-851. Cappelen, A. W., K. Nygaard, E. O. Sorensen, and B. Tungodden (2015). Social preferences in the lab: A comparison of students and a representative population. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 117 (4), 1306-1326. Carpenter, J., C. Connolly, and C. K. Myers (2008). Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment. Experimental Economics 11 (3), 282-298. Charness, G. and M. Rabin (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (3), 817-869. Chen, Y., L. Razzolini, and T. L. Turocy (2007). Congestion allocation for distributed networks: an experimental study. Economic Theory 33 (1), 121-143. Clark, J. (2002). House money effects in public good experiments. Experimental Economics 5 (3), 223-231. Dahlberg, S. and M. Solevid (2016). Does corruption suppress voter turnout? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (4), 489-510. Daley, S. (2012). A tale of Greek enterprise and olive oil, smothered in red tape. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/19/world/europe/in-greece-business-rules-can-puzzle-entrepreneurs.html. Del Monte, A. and E. Papagni (2001). Public expenditure, corruption, and economic growth: the case of italy. European Journal of Political Economy 17 (1), 1 - 16. Dieckmann, A., V. Grimm, M. Unfried, V. Utikal, and L. Valmasoni (2016). On trust in honesty and volunteering among europeans: Cross-country evidence on perceptions and behavior. European Economic Review 90, 225-253. Dincer, O. and O. Teoman (2019). Does corruption kill? evidence from half a century infant mortality data. Social Science & Medicine 232, 332 - 339. Dold, M. and M. Khadjavi (2017). Jumping the queue: An experiment on procedural preferences. Games and Economic Behavior 102, 127-137. Dshalalow, J. H. (1997). Frontiers in queueing: models and applications in science and engineering, Volume 7. CRC press. Exadaktylos, F., A. M. Espin, and P. Bra~nas-Garza (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Scientific Reports 3 (1), 1213. Falk, A., S. Meier, and C. Zehnder (2013). Do lab experiments misrepresent social preferences? the case of self-selected student samples. Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (4), 839-852. Fehr, E. and K. M. Schmidt (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), 817-868. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10 (2), 171-178. Frank, B., S. Li, C. B�uhren, and H. Qin (2015). Group decision making in a corruption experiment: China and germany compared. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik 235 (2), 207 - 227. Frank, B. and G. G. Schulze (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 43 (1), 101-113. Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology 30 (1), 409-425. Frigau, L., T. Medda, and V. Pelligra (2019). From the field to the lab. an experiment on the representativeness of standard laboratory subjects. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 78, 160 - 169. Gaggero, A., S. Appleton, and L. Song (2018). Framing effects on bribery behaviour: experimental evidence from china and uganda. Journal of the Economic Science Association 4 (1), 86-97. Green, L. (2006). Queueing analysis in healthcare. In R. W. Hall (Ed.), Patient Flow: Reducing Delay in Healthcare Delivery. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Volume 91, pp. 281-307. Boston, MA: Springer. Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association 1 (1), 114-125. Grundler, K. and N. Potrafke (2019). Corruption and economic growth: New empirical evidence. European Journal of Political Economy 60, 101810. Gupta, S., H. Davoodi, and R. Alonso-Terme (2002). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty? Economics of Governance 3 (1), 23-45. Harrison, G. W. (2007). House money effects in public good experiments: Comment. Experimental Economics 10 (4), 429-437. Heidemann, D. (2001). A queueing theory model of nonstationary traffic flow. Transportation Science 35 (4), 405-412. 29 Hewstone, M., M. Rubin, and H. Willis (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1), 575-604. PMID: 11752497. Hinkle, S. and R. Brown (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances 48, 70. Holmberg, S. and B. Rothstein (2011). Dying of corruption. Health Economics, Policy and Law 6 (4), 529547. Hooghe, M., T. Reeskens, D. Stolle, and A. Trappers (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in europe: A cross-national multilevel study. Comparative Political Studies 42 (2), 198-223. Hope, K. (2016). Athens approves luxury Cretan tourist project after 25-year wait. Available at https://www.ft.com/content/2f437b52-e7aa-11e5-a09b-1f8b0d268c39. Inoue, J.-i. and N. Sazuka (2010). Queueing theoretical analysis of foreign currency exchange rates. Quantitative Finance 10 (2), 121-130. Integrity Watch (2016). National corruption survey 2016: Afghan perceptions and experiences of corruption. Available at https://iwaweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/NCS__English_ _for-web.pdf. Last accessed on August 5, 2020. Jiang, T., J. W. Lindemans, and C. Bicchieri (2015). Can trust facilitate bribery? experimental evidence from china, italy, japan, and the netherlands. Social Cognition 33 (5), 483-504. Jost, J. T. and D. Burgess (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (3), 293-305. Koszegi, B. and M. Rabin (2007). Reference-dependent risk attitudes. The American Economic Review 97 (4), 1047-1073. Krupka, E. L. and R. A. Weber (2013). Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (3), 495-524. Levitt, S. D. and J. A. List (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (2), 153-174. Li, Q., L. An, J. Xu, and M. Baliamoune-Lutz (2018). Corruption costs lives: evidence from a cross-country study. The European Journal of Health Economics 19 (1), 153-165. Loch, C. H. and Y. Wu (2007). Behavioral operations management. Foundations and trends in technology, information and operations management. Now Publishers. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3), 681-712. Meon, P.-G. and K. Sekkat (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice 122 (1), 69-97. Milgram, S., H. J. Liberty, R. Toledo, and J. Wackenhut (1986). Response to intrusion into waiting lines. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (4), 683. OECD (2018). Behavioural Insights for Public Integrity. Paris: OECD Publishing. Ortega, F. and G. Peri (2014). Openness and income: The roles of trade and migration. Journal of International Economics 92 (2), 231 - 251. Pagan, A. and A. Ullah (1999). Nonparametric Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Peter, P. O. and R. Sivasamy (2019). Queueing theory techniques and its real applications to health care systems outpatient visits. International Journal of Healthcare Management 0 (0), 1-9. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics 4 (2), 187 - 203. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2004). Chapter 6 Governance and Corruption, pp. 77-115. Global Crises, Global Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ryvkin, D. and D. Serra (2020). Corruption and competition among bureaucrats: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 175, 439 - 451. Salmon, T. C. and D. Serra (2017). Corruption, social judgment and culture: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 142, 64 - 78. Schmid, K., A. A. Ramiah, and M. Hewstone (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science 25 (3), 665-674. Schmitt, B. H., L. Dube, and F. Leclerc (1992). Intrusions into waiting lines: does the queue constitute a social system? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (5), 806. Shunko, M., J. Niederhoff, and Y. Rosokha (2018). Humans are not machines: The behavioral impact of queueing design on service time. Management Science 64 (1), 453-473. Snowberg, E. and L. Yariv (2018, June). Testing the waters: Behavior across participant pools. Working Paper 24781, National Bureau of Economic Research. Stein, W. E., A. Rapoport, D. A. Seale, H. Zhang, and R. Zwick (2007). Batch queues with choice of arrivals: Equilibrium analysis and experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior 59 (2), 345-363. Stiglitz, J. E. (1992). Prices and queues as screening devices in competitive markets. Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn, 128-66. Sweeney, G., K. Despota, and S. Lindner (2013). Transparency International Global Corruption Report: Education. New York: Routlegde. Transparency International (2013). Global corruption barometer 2013. Available at https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2013_GlobalCorruptionBarometer_EN_200525_112757.pdf. Last accessed on August 5, 2020. Transparency International (2017). Global corruption barometer 2017. Available at https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/GCB_Citizens_voices_FINAL.pdf. Last accessed on August 5, 2020. Transparency International (2020). Corruption perception index 2019 report. Available at https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2019_CPI_Report_EN.pdf. Last accessed on August 5, 2020. Tsutsui, K. and D. J. Zizzo (2014). Group status, minorities and trust. Experimental Economics 17 (2), 215-244. Ullah, B. (2020). Financial constraints, corruption, and sme growth in transition economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 75, 120 - 132. van Veldhuizen, R. (2013). The influence of wages on public officials corruptibility: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology 39, 341 - 356. Vilaplana, J., F. Solsona, I. Teixido, J. Mateo, F. Abella, and J. Rius (2014). A queuing theory model for cloud computing. The Journal of Supercomputing 69 (1), 492-507. Zhou, R. and D. Soman (2008). Consumers' waiting in queues: The role of first-order and second-order justice. Psychology & Marketing 25 (3), 262-279. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102775 |