Lead-lag relationship between domestic credit and economic growth: the case of Singapore

Samad, Fadillah and Masih, Mansur (2016): Lead-lag relationship between domestic credit and economic growth: the case of Singapore.

Abstract

The paper evaluates the causal relations and dynamic linkages between Economic growth proxied by real GDP per capita and four other macroeconomic and financial variables namely Gross Domestic Savings as a percentage of GDP, Domestic Credit to Private Sector as a percentage of GDP, Inflation and Real interest rates. The analysis relies on a time series technique, in particular, cointegration, error correction modelling, variance decomposition and a LRSM (Long-run structural modelling) technique to overcome limitations found in the former and seeking to quantify the theoretical relationship among the variables. The empirical results we obtained bear various implications on the issues of direction of causality and long term stability of dynamic linkages between macroeconomic and financial variables. The presence of cointegration between economic growth and these variables indicate a long-run predictability of the magnifying or reducing effect of economic growth. We find evidence that the supply leading condition is applicable to Singapore except if it is being proxied by Gross Domestic Savings instead of Domestic Credit to Private Sector as being used in this paper. We are aware that these variables are used interchangeably as a proxy for financial development. Subsequently, this would then suggest that Singapore is still at its early stage of economic development if following the supply-leading and demand-following hypothesis envisioned by Patrick (1966). This may appear as contradicting one’s intuition as Singapore being a high income economy, will most likely be in its later stage of economic development vis-a-vis a demand following condition. In addition, we find evidence that Domestic Credit to Private Sector seems to be the least influential in affecting growth, in contrast, Gross Domestic Savings appear as a better option in driving growth in this economy. This finding is in line with Romer (1986), who points out that permanent increase in growth can be achieved by higher savings and capital accumulation. Therefore the potential rate of growth of output for Singapore can be significantly enhanced by pursuing an active policy of sound financial sector development, particularly focusing on ways to promote savings in contrast to leveraging.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Domestic credit, economic growth, lead-lag, VECM, VDC, Singapore
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy

References

Ang, J. B. (2008). What are the mechanisms linking financial development and economic growth in Malaysia?. Economic Modelling, 25(1), 38-53

Banu, I. M. (2013). The Impact of Credit on Economic Growth in the Global Crisis Context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 25-30.

Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., and Zettelmeyer, J. (2012). What makes growth sustained?. Journal of Development Economics, 98(2), 149-166.

Calderón, C., and Liu, L. (2003). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 321-334.

Chang, S. H., and Huang, L. C. (2010). The nexus of finance and GDP growth in Japan: Do real interest rates matter?. Japan and the World Economy, 22(4), 235-242.

Darrat, A. F. (1999). Are financial deepening and economic growth causally related? Another look at the evidence. International Economic Journal, 13(3), 19-35.

Fischer, S. (1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of monetary economics, 32(3), 485-512.

Hsueh, S. J., Hu, Y. H., and Tu, C. H. (2013). Economic growth and financial development in Asian countries: A bootstrap panel Granger causality analysis. Economic Modelling, 32, 294-301.

Khalifa Al-Yousif, Y. (2002). Financial development and economic growth: another look at the evidence from developing countries. Review of Financial Economics, 11(2), 131-150.

King, R. G., and Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The quarterly journal of economics, 108(3), 717-737.

Levine, R., Loayza, N., and Beck, T. (2000). Financial intermediation and growth: Causality and causes. Journal of monetary Economics, 46(1), 31-77.

Masih, M., Al-Elg, A., and Madani, H. (2009). Causality between financial development and economic growth: an application of vector error correction and variance decomposition methods to Saudi Arabia. Applied Economics, 41(13), 1691-1699.

Pagano, M. (1993). Financial markets and growth: An overview. European Economic Review, 37, 613–622.

Patrick, H. T. (1966). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14, 174-189.

Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (2002). Long-run structural modelling. Econometric Reviews, 21(1), 49-87.

Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.

Rousseau, P. L. (2002). Historical perspectives on financial development and economic Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper number 9333.

Takáts, E., and Upper, C. (2013). Credit and growth after financial crises. Bank for International Settlements, Working paper number 416.

Valadkhani, A and Chancharat, S (2008), Dynamic Linkages between Thai and International Stock Markets, Journal of Economic Studies, 35(5), 425-441.