Predicting choice-averse and choice-loving behaviors in a field experiment with actual shoppers

Ong, David (2021): Predicting choice-averse and choice-loving behaviors in a field experiment with actual shoppers. Forthcoming in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , Vol. 188, No. August (August 2021): pp. 46-71.

Abstract

A large body of chiefly laboratory research has attempted to demonstrate that people can exhibit choice-averse behavior from cognitive overload when faced with many options. However, meta-analyses of these studies, which are generally of one or two product lines, reveal conflicting results. Findings of choice-averse behavior are balanced by findings of choice-loving behavior. Unexplored is the possibility that many consumers may purchase to reveal their tastes for unfamiliar products, rather than attempt to forecast their tastes before purchase. I model such ‘sampling-search’ behavior and predict that the purchases of unfamiliar consumers increase with the available number of varieties for popular/mainstream product lines and decrease for niche product lines. To test these predictions, I develop a measure of popularity based on a survey of 1,440 shoppers for their preferences over 24 product lines with 339 varieties at a large supermarket in China. 35,694 shoppers were video recorded after the varieties they faced on shelves were randomly reduced. As found in the meta-studies, choice-averse behavior was balanced by choice-loving behavior. However, as predicted, the probability of choice-loving behavior increases with the number of available varieties for popular product lines, whereas choice-averse behavior increases with available varieties for niche product lines. These findings suggest that increasing the number of varieties has predictable opposing effects on sales, depending upon the popularity of the product line, and opens the possibility of reconciling apparently conflicting prior results.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: field experiment, choice overload, choice-aversion, consumer search
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing

References

Bechara, Antoine, Damasio, Hanna, Tranel, Daniel, & Damasio, Antonio R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science (New York, N.Y.), 275(5304), 1293–5. Bertrand, Marianne, Karlan, Dean, Mullainathan, Sendhil, Shafir, Eldar, & Zinman, Jonathan. (2010). What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 263–306. Boatwright, Peter, & Nunes, Joseph C. (2001). Reducing Assortment: An Attribute-Based Approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 50–63. Boatwright, Peter, & Nunes, Joseph C. (2004). Correction note for “reducing assortment: An attribute-based approach.” Journal of Marketing, 68(July). Bronnenberg, Bart J., Dubé, Jean Pierre H., & Gentzkow, Matthew. (2012). The evolution of brand preferences: Evidence from consumer migration. American Economic Review. Chernev, Alexander, Böckenholt, Ulf, & Goodman, Joseph. (2010). Commentary on Scheibehenne, Greifeneder, and Todd Choice Overload: Is There Anything to It? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 426–428. Chernev, Alexander, Böckenholt, Ulf, & Goodman, Joseph. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333–358. Chiu, Yao-Chu, Huang, Jong-Tsun, Duann, Jeng-Ren, & Lin, Ching-Hung. (2018). Twenty Years After the Iowa Gambling Task: Rationality, Emotion, and Decision-Making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. Penguin Publishing Group. Gneezy, Ayelet. (2017). Field Experimentation in Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(1), 140–143. Iyengar, Sheena S., Jiang, Wei, & Huberman, Gur. (2004). How Much Choice is Too Much ?: Contributions to 401 (k) Retirement Plans. Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance, 83–95. Iyengar, Sheena S., & Kamenica, Emir. (2010). Choice proliferation, simplicity seeking, and asset allocation. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7–8), 530–539. Iyengar, Sheena S., & Lepper, Mark R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan Publishers Limited. Kamenica, Emir. (2008). Contextual Inference in Markets: On the Informational Content of Product Lines. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2127–2149. Ketcham, Jonathan D., Lucarelli, Claudio, & Powers, Christopher A. (2015). Paying Attention or Paying Too Much in Medicare Part D? American Economic Review, 105(1), 204–233. Kuksov, Dmitri, & Villas-Boas, J. Miguel. (2010). When More Alternatives Lead to Less Choice. Marketing Science, 29(3), 507–524. Liu, Lin, & Dukes, Anthony. (2016). Consumer Search with Limited Product Evaluation. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 25(1), 32–55. Machina, Mark J. (1989). Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Literature, 27(4), 1622–1668. Nagler, Matthew G. (2015). Trading off the benefits and costs of choice: Evidence from Australian elections. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 114, 1–12. Ong, David. (2012). Can there ever be too many flavors of Häagen-Dazs? Product stereotypes and choice overload behavior. Working Paper. Scheibehenne, Benjamin. (2008). The Effect of Having Too Much Choice. Working Paper. Scheibehenne, Benjamin, Greifeneder, Rainer, & Todd, Peter M. (2010). Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 409–425. Simester, Duncan. (2017). Field Experiments in Marketing. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, 1, 465–497. Sun, Monic. (2012). How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58(4), 696–707. Villas-Boas, J. M. (2009). Product Variety and Endogenous Pricing with Evaluation Costs. Management Science, 55(8), 1338–1346. Waldman, Don E., & Jensen, Elizabeth J. (2019). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Textbook. Routledge.