On the comparison of educational subsidy schemes in an endogenous growth model

Miyazaki, Koichi (2021): On the comparison of educational subsidy schemes in an endogenous growth model.

Abstract

This study considers a three-period overlapping generations model with an endogenous growth setting, in which an agent borrows in the first period and repays the loan in the second period under a perfect credit market. Two educational subsidy schemes are considered: one is provided when an agent borrows and the other is provided when the agent repays their loan. This study compares the growth rates and social welfare under each educational subsidy scheme at a unique balanced growth path equilibrium. The first contribution of this paper is that it provides sufficient conditions under which the growth rate in one scheme is higher than that in the other. A key to determining the size relationship of growth rates is whether the production of goods and services is physical-capital-intensive, which determines the size of the interest rate. The second contribution is that it shows that higher growth and higher social welfare may not be achieved simultaneously. Specifically, this paper presents a case wherein, even if the growth rate when student loans are subsidized is higher than that when the cost of education is subsidized, social welfare defined by the Golden Rule criterion in the former scheme can be lower than that in the latter scheme.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Endogenous growth; educational subsidy; balanced growth path equilibrium; growth rate; social welfare; Golden Rule
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H52 - Government Expenditures and Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I22 - Educational Finance ; Financial Aid; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Azariadis, Costas, and Allan Drazen. 1990. ``Threshold externalities in economic development." Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2): 501--526.

Blankenau, William. 2005. ``Public schooling, college subsidies and growth." Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29(3): 487--507.

Boldrin, Michele, and Ana Montes. 2005. ``The Intergenerational State Education and Pensions." Review of Economic Studies 72(3): 651--664.

Diamond, Perter. 1965. ``National debt in a neoclassical growth model." American Economic Review 55(4): 1126--1150.

de la Croix, David, and Matthias Doepke. 2003. ``Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters." American Economic Review 93(4):1091--1113.

de la Croix, David, and Matthias Doepke. 2004. ``Public versus private education when differential fertility matters." Journal of Development Economics 73(2):607--629.

Del Rey, Elena, and Miguel-Angel Lopez-Garcia. 2013. ``Optimal education and pensions in an endogenous growth model." Journal of Economic Theory 148(4): 1737--1750.

Del Rey, Elena, and Miguel-Angel Lopez-Garcia. 2016. ``Endogenous growth and welfare effects of education subsidies and intergenerational transfers." Economic Modelling 52(B): 531--539.

Del Rey, Elena, and Miguel-Angel Lopez-Garcia. 2019. ``Optimal public policy a la Ramsey in an endogenous growth model." Journal of Economics 128(2): 99--118.

Docquier, Frederic, Oliver Paddison, and Pierre Pestieau. 2007. ``Optimal accumulation in an endogenous growth setting with human capital." Journal of Economic Theory 134(1): 361--378.

Eckwert, Bernhard, and Itzha Zilcha. 2014. ``Higher education: Subsidizing tuition versus subsidizing student loans." Journal of Public Economic Theory 16(6): 835--853.

Glomm, Gerhard, and B. Ravikumar. 1992. ``Public versus private investment in human capital: Endogenous growth and income inequality." Journal of Political Economy 100(4):818--834.

Lucas, Robert E. 1988. ``On the mechanics of economic development." Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1): 3-42.

Yakita, Akira. 2004. ``School loans, subsidies, and economic growth." FinanzArchiv. 60(2): 262--276.