The relation between digitalization and regional development in Romania

Antonescu, Daniela (2022): The relation between digitalization and regional development in Romania. Published in: Central European Journal of Geography and Sustainable Development , Vol. 4, No. 2 (27 December 2022): pp. 64-77.

Abstract

Digitalization is an essential element for the development of today’s society, in the context of actual geo-political challenges. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the process of digitalization, offering new perspectives on sustainable and inclusive development. From the point of view of the regional approach, digitalization can have an important impact on the level of territorial development and on the reduction of economic and social inequalities. This paper proposes to identify the relationship between a series of indicators specific to digitization and regional GDP, with the help of panel models. The objective of the research is to estimate the relationship between GDP and two indicators specific to digitalization: online commerce and broadband internet infrastructure, the level of the eight development regions in Romania. Dependency modelling, based on econometric equations, offers the possibility of highlighting the way in which the two indicators of the digital economy contribute to the growth of GDP per capita. This analysis aims to illustrate the fact that broadband technologies and the increase in the number of people using the Internet for commercial purposes can have a positive impact on the growth of the regional economy. The results of the analysis highlighted the direct relationship of the indicators between the three variables related to the digitalization process at the level of Romania’s regions and the strong influence of broadband internet and online trade on GDP per capita, proving that any growth among independent variables will lead to an increase amongst the dependent variables.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Digitalization, GDP, regional inequalities, Panel model, OLS model.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R10 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R15 - Econometric and Input-Output Models ; Other Models; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis

References

Antonescu, D. (2013). The Regional Development Policy of Romania in the Post-Accession Period. Working Papers, Romanian Academy, National Institute of Economic Research, Bucharest. Retrieved from http://www.workingpapers.ro/2013/wpince131209.pdf

Hardy, A. P. (1980). The role of the telephone in economic development. Telecommunications Policy, 4(4), 278-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(80)90044-0

Gruber, H. & Koutroumpis, P., (2010). Mobile Communications: Diffusion Facts and Prospects. Communications & Strategies, 77, 133-145. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228295613_Mobile_Communications_Diffusion_Facts_and_Prospects

Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T., & Woessmann, L. (2009). Broadband Infrastructure and Economic Growth. CESIFO Working Paper, No. 2861. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1516232

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483-499. Retrieved from https://pr.princeton.edu/pictures/g-k/krugman/krugman-increasing_returns_1991.pdf

Thompson, H.G., & Garbacz, C. (2011). Economic impacts of mobile versus fixed broadband, Telecommunication Policy, 35(11), 999-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.07.004

Hikmaturokhman, A., Ramli, K., Suryanegara, M., Ratna, A. A. P., Rohman, I. K., & Zaber, M. (2022). A Proposal for Formulating a Spectrum Usage Fee for 5G Private Networks in Indonesian Industrial Areas. Informatics, 9(2), 44. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/informatics9020044

Waverman, L., & Dasgupta, K. (2010). Connectivity Scorecard 2010. Retrieved from https://www.ifap.ru/pr/2010/n100212a.pdf